Is the eurozone saved?

 
ECB logo Are the euro area's financial woes history?

With Portugal joining Ireland and Spain in announcing that it no longer needs a bailout from the International Monetary Fund and the eurozone's rescue mechanisms, the question arises whether the euro area's financial woes are history.

Is the euro-area now sound as a pound (so sorry for the inappropriate metaphor)?

Well if you are a risk-loving canny investor, it has been a wonderful few months to be buying the debts of financially stretched euro-governments.

According to Bloomberg data, buyers of Spanish bonds would have made a 10% profit over the past year and holders of Portuguese government bonds would have made a 17% return.

The best investment of all were the bonds of the financially mullered Greek government, which has delivered a lip-smackingly tasty 55% profit over 12 months.

Which means that the implied cost for the Portuguese government of what it has to pay to borrow (the yield on its bonds) is almost as low as at any time in its history - and the interest rate that investors demand that the more financial stretched euro governments in general pay to borrow is remarkably close to what they charge mighty, solid Germany.

Or to put it another way, the institutional investors and hedge funds which three years ago were dumping eurozone assets as though they were infected with plague currently think the risk of Portugal, or Spain or Ireland going bust, or of the eurozone falling apart, is de minimis.

So everything must be tickety boo in Euroland again, surely.

Well not for the almost 12% of eurozone citizens who are unemployed, given that - according to the OECD's new forecast - that rate is set to fall only marginally in the coming 18 months, to a still-high 11.4% in 2015 (and in Spain the unemployment rate is almost 26%).

What still appears seriously wrong in the euro area is that meaningful economic growth remains elusive.

The OECD today forecasts growth of GDP or output in the eurozone of just 1.2% in the current year - which compares with a forecast of 2.6% for the US and could turn out to be a third of the rate at which the UK economy may grow this year.

And even by 2015, the OECD expects the euro area to be growing at just 1.7%, more than two percentage points less than the speed at which it expects the global economy to expand.

Here is the point: thanks mainly to the European Central Bank's repeated promises to take (largely unspecified) measures to prevent eurozone Armageddon, there is a good deal more financial stability in the eurozone, but that stability should not be taken for granted.

The immediate risk is of considerable political turmoil. All over the eurozone (and in the UK too, of course), the sense among citizens that their leaders are not delivering prosperity has seen a dramatic rise in the popularity of Eurosceptic parties of left and right.

We will know the magnitude and significance of that advance when we get the results of elections for the EU parliament later this month.

But if the eurozone's electorate becomes yet more disenchanted with the region's integrationist elite, it will become much harder for the currency union to adopt reforms widely regarded as necessary to stave off future disaster.

There has been plenty of hardship foisted on citizens in those countries where current account and trade deficits became unsupportably wide and government debts spiralled out of control.

But there is, as yet, very little of the political integration among member countries to prevent those sorts of dangerous imbalances reoccurring: there is very little direct central control on the spending, taxing and borrowing of eurozone members.

And although new institutions have been created to provide succour to eurozone governments and banks when things get hairy, the resources available to them are limited - largely because the solidarity of deep-pocketed Germans with the rest of the euro area remains minimal.

None of which is to belittle the current exercise by the European Central Bank to strengthen the eurozone's anaemic banks.

But it is to say that one-off rescues should not be confused with long term structural improvements.

So, for example, the common funds for rescuing banks are trivial compared to potential long-term needs. And the cost of insuring the deposits of eurozone banks continues to fall on individual governments - which means that in any future market crash, the finances of a weak government and its weak banks will remain lethally inter-connected.

Don't take my word that the eurozone's waters are not remotely shark-free.

Even the world's most constitutionally bullish investment bank, Goldman Sachs, has recently published a report on what makes a currency union sustainable. Goldman's conclusion: "Whether the changes that are being implemented will make the euro area's institutional structure sufficiently robust to deal with a future crisis is questionable."

Or to put it another way, if the euro-area's leaders will not or can not use the current financial calm to push through a harder and more controversial political overhaul - which would inevitably see power shift from nations to the centre - then we may not have to wait many years to revisit potential euro catastrophe.

 
Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Does Labour have the cash to expand the NHS?

How much of Labour's ambitions to improve healthcare can be met by its proposed mansion tax - and will it have to find other sources of revenue?

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 13.

    5 jeffa4444
    "The EU are a failure if it was concerned about Europe it would overule our own government and step in and block attemps by Pfizer to purchase AstraZeneca."

    Well, that's certainly the first time I've ever heard a Eurosceptic complain about the EU *not* meddling in out affairs. I can only imagine the reaction if the EU did overrule our government.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 12.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 11.

    8. John

    How can you describe an organisation that is intent on removing state subsidies and is intent on market liberalisations of "socialist economics"?

    As for teh BBC it had an article on an anti-EU report from Civitas yesterday but said nothing about CityUK's report last week detailing how leaving the EU would inevitable lead to higher prices, less choice and loss of trade. Why?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 10.

    Us in the South love what the EU has done. Its allowed us to buy holiday homes in Spain for peanuts. And cut down our costs for child care by allowing us to bring over au pairs and pay them guideline rates which work out for a week what it would cost for one day in a nursery. They are doing there upmost to protect the needs of the wealthier and we should all take a minute to applaud them. Hip hip

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    "David Horton
    Have they benefited from being in the EU?
    And neither do we"

    Have you brought back lots more wine and spirits than the pre-1992 "duty free limit"? Have you ever used a mobile phone in the EU? Do you use Chrome or Firefox on your Windows PC? Do you get your car serviced in a non-franchised dealer whilst under warranty? Have you used a low cost airline?

    Then you have benefited.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    The problems on the fringes of Europe have no changed, all that has happened is that the EU-funded BBC has decided to pay less attention to this dire consequence of socialist economics. There is still a lot of discussion and journalism about the EU crisis in more reputable and impartial media outlets.

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 7.

    Looking at the growing Frech deficit and the expansion of their public sector another problem is brewing up fast.Combine this with huge youth unemployment and coming Euro elections and the strains on the Euro will be growing.A higher vote for Euro sceptic parties across Northern Europe will be the start of a process to trim the Euro .

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 6.

    As long as the Euro area continues to invest more in protecting incompetent and/or corrupt bankers than in healthcare and education the Euro zone will continue to fail 99% of its citizens. Same as in the UK really.

    And no amount of BBC propaganda will change that. We are neither blind nor stupid.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 5.

    The EU are a failure if it was concerned about Europe it would overule our own government and step in and block attemps by Pfizer to purchase AstraZeneca.
    Instead they stand by happy to promote less competition and inteletrural property sailing off to America a country that blocks deals if its not in their interest.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    A currency union without the political union necessary to allow for much higher movement of labour across borders than current and much higher public wealth transfers from rich to poor is economically doomed to break down.

    EU will slowly dwindle in importance so the inevitable break down will be less significant in 20 years in future than would have been 2 years in past

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    The problem with the eurozone is that it doesn't represent the people. The reason it doesn't represent the people is because no one can be bothered to actually engage with Europe. In short, a good idea will probably fail because not enough people could be bothered about it.

  • rate this
    +16

    Comment number 2.

    Ever increasing deflationary pressures will force the ECB to print more and more money a la Fed. This alone will be enough to destroy the euro irrespective whether or not there is closer political union. The single currency is a dead man walking.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    Unfortunately the Germans continue to be rather obsessed by non-existent inflation. The German Govt is now also running a surplus. They should be running a large deficit to stimulate their economy which would make the adjustment for everyone else much easier. Instead they are somewhat selfishly taking most of the Euro benefits for themselves. Very Mercantilist if you want to look at history.

 

Page 13 of 13

 

Features

  • Peaky Blinders publicity shotBrum do

    Why is the Birmingham accent so difficult to mimic?


  • Oliver CromwellA brief history

    The 900-year-story behind the creation of a UK parliament


  • Beer and alcoholAbstinence wars

    The struggle to claim the month of October


  • Image of Ankor Wat using lidarJungle Atlantis

    How lasers have revealed an ancient city beneath the forest


  • Tesco signBest before?

    Has Tesco passed its sell-by date, asks Richard Anderson


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.