UK's recovery not debt-fuelled

 
Money The overall indebtedness of the UK economy should fall pretty sharply in 2014

The publication of the 2013 national accounts contained a number of positives, not least of which was an upward revision to exports, and confirmation that business investment is recovering.

Or, to put it another way, although the belated escape of the UK economy from the long years of stagnation has been too dependent, many would say, on growth in consumer spending (in the traditional British way), the recovery is not as unbalanced as some have feared.

And there is another benign trend, noted by Michael Saunders of Citi, which is that national income is at last growing faster than our debts.

Or, to put it another way, the burden of our debts is - for the first time since the great crash of 2008 - diminishing.

To be clear, those debts remain big by historic standards, and the falls are not transformative of the UK's prospects.

But there does appear to be a trend of gentle deleveraging, or a reduction in debts as a percentage of income, after the many years of binging on credit.

And please, at this juncture, do not scream "unsustainable housing boom" and point to the current surge of households - especially in London and the South East - taking out big mortgages.

Falling debts

Of course, there is a bit of that going on, but in 2013 at least the big trends were of a more prudent sort.

As it happens, my numbers are a bit different from Saunders', because there are a variety of ways to cut the UK Economic Accounts.

But the direction of travel is the same.

Thus, debts of private non-financial companies fell between 2012 and 2013, from 99% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to 94%.

And household debts dropped from 94% to 91.5% of GDP.

Those ratios are still pretty high by historic standards, but the falls are significant.

However, when it comes to the public sector, the economic accounts do not really tally with what we know to be the underlying picture, that of rising indebtedness: they show a fall in gross central government indebtedness from 100% of GDP to 97% (or from 71% to 69% on a net basis), presumably because they do not adjust for a number of one-off transactions that distort the fundamental trend.

But even if we use the Office for Budget Responsibility's estimate that the government borrowed the equivalent of about 7% of GDP in the last calendar year, aggregate indebtedness in the real economy is still high, at about 300% of GDP, but it may be very slightly shrinking.

This leads to two stupidly obvious thoughts.

First, it would be wrong to characterise the recovery as debt-fuelled.

Second, with austerity rolling relentlessly on this year, and GDP at market prices likely to keep rising faster than private sector debts, 2014 should be a year in which the overall leverage or indebtedness of the British economy falls pretty sharply.

 
Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Richer at last?

How significant is today's confirmation that earnings are at last rising faster than inflation?

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Robert

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 168.

    @167. plotinus "It is hard to argue against the idea that economic activity is financed through bank lending."

    A household or a business that is spending less than it earns is more likely to spend or invest more than one which is already in debt.

    Government aside, all sectors now owe less in cash terms than two years ago. Only mortgages are up ...but by less than consumer credit is down!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 167.

    Debt fuelled.
    Yes.
    It is hard to argue against the idea that economic activity is financed through bank lending.
    The mountain of debt is elsewhere however.
    We will be OK as long as we are the ones who operate the system.
    When China becomes the next superpower, we will be locked into a terminal tailspin.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 166.

    @153. ComradeOgilvy "At what point do we have to reassess GDP as a useful economic measure due to non-productive high-volume trading?"

    As a business activity, trading is neither production nor "final consumption expenditure". It therefore affects GDP only to the extent that the composite effect of many trades is profitable for, via the "gross operating surplus" of the businesses.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 165.

    164.AfA

    "GDP the measure of what?"

    To the point. Debt measured against economic activity is about as valid as measuring luck by the amout of times you can toss a coin and win.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 164.

    ComradeOgilvy @161
    "One for Grounder"

    @131 'result' short of '42', 91.64-91.47=0.17

    Next question, back to the basic: "GDP the measure of what?"

    Shall we 'ask a policeman', how to emulate and measure the 'product' of liberty: the work of a free people? Someone 'knows' - or has a fair idea - how 'productive' is HF or high-volume trading. Ask, "Why no word?" Advantage lies somewhere, we trust?

 

Comments 5 of 168

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.