Will Co-op officials vote themselves out of power?

Co-operative bank branch

Lord Myners wants the Co-op Group's elected officials to make what they may see as the supreme sacrifice - in voting for reforms that would give them a lot less power, and would give executives, professional non-executives and millions of Co-op members more power.

But the former City minister and ex fund-management boss, hired by Co-op to recommend changes to the way this sprawling mutual is governed and managed, fears that failure to adopt the reforms would be catastrophic.

He argues that it was the commercial naïveté of the elected officials that almost destroyed the group, by permitting Co-op Bank to manage itself in a near suicidal way, and by approving the too-expensive takeover of the Somerfield supermarket chain.

They failed to rein in dangerous ambition - and because Co-op has no conventional shareholders, because it is a mutual, the institutions of the City of London failed to restrain the Co-op in any way (not that these institutions would be seen as models of intelligent oversight for public companies, but maybe they are better than nothing).

Myners says Co-op Group only avoided total collapse by the skin of its teeth and thanks to the exhausting and exhaustive efforts of the executive team - who was led by Euan Sutherland till Tuesday, when he quit in frustration at what he saw as the intransigent opposition to reform of the elected officials.

But Co-op is not out of the woods. As Myners says, its takeover spree has left it lumbered with too much debt, around £1.5bn.

And as I mentioned earlier this week, the appalling financial performance of Co-op gives its banks, led by Barclays, the ability to seize its assets - which they would be obliged to do if they perceived Co-op Group to be in a death spiral.

To placate the banks, Co-op is selling important assets, its farms and - probably - its pharmacies.

But the banks will also want to see top quality management of its most important business, its supermarkets - which have been losing market share, and whose profits are likely to be squeezed by a prolonged and vicious price war that is the expected consequence of Morrison's rehabilitation plan.

But a decent successor to Sutherland is unlikely to be found unless and until the Co-op is perceived to be governable and manageable.

As Myners points out, just 50 of these - many of them remunerated by Co-op for their elected positions - have the ability to veto reforms that would threaten their status and rewards.

But if they do block the establishment of a more conventional board structure, and don't accept a future role for themselves largely as guardians of the mutual ideal, then - in Myners view - they may find they will have ringside seats as this most important of all co-operative organisations is destroyed in a conflagration of its own creation.

Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

This column...

This column may be a bit quiet for a bit, because I am away from the office.

Read full article

More on This Story


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 47.

    Financial organisations should be managed in the traditional way for a very good reason. The decisions should be made from the top down by people qualified and experienced enough to understand what they are doing.

    The Co-Op organisational structure appears to be a strategic risk and I expect further problems unless it changes.

  • rate this

    Comment number 46.

    there is more chance of the board of the coop group voting for less powers for themselves than there is of anyone going to prison from the major banks over any of the trillion pound plus frauds we ALL have to pay for with stupidly low interest rates.

    and thats for sure......

  • rate this

    Comment number 45.

    I work for the Co-Op. (Retail side not banking) although we are sad to see our CEO we are all 100% behind Richard Pennycook.
    The plan agreed with the creditors is still in place and they see Pennycook as a very safe pair of hands.
    The confidence in the business is extremely high with our new Exec team and although we will have tough times ahead we are confident on our future

  • rate this

    Comment number 44.

    @32 (b33bbab3)
    " smile said my money would be protected if it were put into administration -- BUT does that mean I MIGHT get it back only after bigtime creditors have been paid"

    No - like all UK banks, your first £85,000 is underwritten by the government. Despite the picture above the article, the bank is not now the problem. It is the CoOp Group, now only a minority shareholder in the bank.

  • rate this

    Comment number 43.

    The Co-operative movement was born in an era of thieving which continues to this day.

    Will they survive?

    They are up against established companies which would like them to fail.
    Also there are asset strippers ready to pounce.

    And yes I know that the other companies would like other companies to fail as well.
    There is no conspiracy against The Co-op.

    The nature of the beast is that everyone is


Comments 5 of 47



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.