Standard Life could quit Scotland

 
Standard Life building Standard Life is the first major business to warn it could leave Scotland if it votes for independence

Standard Life is putting in place contingency plans to relocate funds, people and operations to England if Scottish people vote for independence and what it regards as material uncertainties about money and regulation are not sorted to its satisfaction.

In its annual report, published on Thursday, the chairman of the Edinburgh-based pensions and savings firm, Gerry Grimstone, says Scotland has been a great base for the company but that, "if anything were to threaten this, we will take whatever action we consider necessary - including transferring parts of our operations from Scotland - in order to ensure continuity and to protect the interests of our stakeholders".

According to Standard Life's chief executive, David Nish, the company - which has had its headquarters in Scotland for 189 years - has "started work to establish additional registered companies to operate outside Scotland, into which we could transfer parts of our operations if necessary".

"This is a precautionary measure to ensure continuity of our businesses' competitive position and to protect the interests of our stakeholders."

Standard Life is the first significant Scottish business to warn that remaining in Scotland may be untenable in the event of a vote for independence.

Its intervention in the debate on Scotland's future is particularly significant because it is a symbolically important company in Scottish financial history and is regarded as a great success.

Standard Life is the UK's biggest provider of defined contribution pensions and self-invested pension plans, and has around £240bn of assets under management.

Scottish and English banknotes

Special report: Scotland's future

Uncertainties

Mr Nish insisted Standard Life has "a long-standing policy of strict political neutrality and at no time will we advise people on how they should vote".

Start Quote

We will take whatever action necessary - including transferring parts of our operations from Scotland - to protect the interests of our stakeholders”

End Quote Gerry Grimstone Chairman, Standard Life

However, he said his strict duty was to assess the impact of independence on the group's four million UK customers, its 5,000 Scottish-based employees and its 1.5 million shareholders.

Mr Nish said this judgement could not be made in a definitive way at the moment because of uncertainties about the currency to be used by an independent Scotland, how interest rates would be set, how financial companies like Standard Life would be regulated, how savings and pensions would be taxed, and on what timetable Scotland could join the EU.

I am told by informed sources that unless a formal monetary, regulatory and currency union were agreed by an independent Scotland with the rest of the UK, which also included some kind of compact on taxes, Standard Life would feel obliged to move both funds and people to England.

The point is that 90% of all Standard Life's UK customers are outside Scotland, while their funds are held inside the country.

And if Scotland seceded without delegating regulation and monetary policy to London, the risks, costs and complexities of customers being in a separate country from their money would be too great - or so Standard Life believes.

"Customers' money and our capital would need to be near regulators responsible for those customers," said a source.

David Nish Chief executive David Nish said this was a precautionary measure

Standard Life also does not believe it could continue to recruit the best people to work in Edinburgh if they were uncertain about how much they would be taxed.

Monetary union

What brought this issue to a head for the company was the recent declaration by Chancellor George Osborne, Labour shadow chancellor Ed Balls and the Liberal Democrat Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, that they would all oppose formal monetary union with Scotland.

I understand that Standard Life does not regard as satisfactory the apparent fallback position of Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond that Scotland would use the pound even without formal monetary union.

Although Standard Life's location is not vital to Scottish prosperity, the threat of tens of billions of pounds of funds and thousands of highly-skilled jobs flowing across the border are bound to have an electrifying impact on the independence battle.

I am reliably told that the emigration of Standard Life could extend to shifting the headquarters from Edinburgh to London.

"There is no stock exchange up here [in Scotland]," said a well-placed source, "and we are not sure we would wish to become a foreign registered company on the London Stock Exchange. So we might have to move."

 
Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

This column...

This column may be a bit quiet for a bit, because I am away from the office.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 2520.

    @2484.Old Reekie
    2477. newageoracle
    "Completely agree, that is why every single person I know will be voting:"
    Good to see someone thinking straight...you were bound to draw fire for bullying with your concise list of reasons to vote NO. They give plenty to think about for those who haven't got round to actually thinking yet and are still on auto.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 2519.

    2517 EmersonV - Comments are from an article in today's 'New Statesman' by David Scheffer, law professor and director of the Center for International Human Rights at Northwestern University School of Law in Chicago.....Not a Scottish Nationalist.... But to be fair to you he did use the term 'Promise to punish' the Scots when describing Osborne's threats as opposed to BULLY.... I put that bit in.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 2518.

    2517. EmersonV
    "I suppose the EU are bullies"

    Barroso is certainly trying in hopes that Cameron [who can demand an opinion] will support him for the NATO job. To what effect remains to be seen as nobody has yet found a way of ejecting Scotland. Valiant unionist MEPs representing (?) Scotland are trying to get an answer via Strasbourg in the hopes of having a new weapon for No Better Together.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 2517.

    2516

    Typical nationalist comment start spouting bully ever time some one disagrees.

    I suppose the EU are bullies when they say you won't get automatic right to join.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 2516.

    It is now obvious that in order to make his Edinburgh threat to punish the Scots, Osborne had to first satisfy BoE that rUK would be responsible for excluded Scotland's share of the debt.He was then free to spout his vile threats. A result of this is that Scotland cannot default on the debt which is no longer ours. Make no mistake ,Osborne will have to negotiate regarding currency after a YES vote

 

Comments 5 of 2520

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.