What makes a global property hot spot?

 

Linda Yueh assesses measures to cool the Hong Kong property market

What makes a city an attractive place to buy in and what's the impact on domestic buyers when foreigners come in?

Despite the tepid economic recovery, property prices are rising at a pace last seen before the financial crash in key cities in post-crisis countries, such as London and New York. London prices have led the best year for property in Britain since 2006, now at 27% above their peak by one gauge. Elsewhere, Singapore and Hong Kong rank among the most expensive markets in the world (alongside London, Geneva and Monaco) and their governments are trying to rein in home prices.

Those looking to buy homes know all too well - property prices have skyrocketed in recent years. In London, home prices have more than doubled (+107%) since 2005, according to UK estate agent Savills.

In other global property hot spots it's even more - home prices have surged 232% in Singapore, and Hong Kong has the most expensive property market in the world.

What's driving up property prices in these cities? Record low interest rates help. Foreign buyers are another contributor as they seek places to park their money - so property is treated more like an investment asset.

And London is attractive. For a $15m property, the annual cost of owning the property is $16,000 paid on council tax. In Hong Kong, it's $95,918, in Singapore it's $121,907 and it's $1.43m in New York. The difference is due to the fact that London has no annual property tax based on the value of the property, only a local council tax.

Bubbles?

For Asian cities like Singapore and Hong Kong, there's another attraction. Neither place has capital gains tax. That's rather appealing including to foreigners. It's why there are new hefty taxes in Hong Kong. Foreign buyers now pay a tax equal to a quarter of the purchase price. Prices are cooling a bit as a result, but are still high.

It's hard not to wonder: Is there a bubble? House prices in Hong Kong are overvalued by an estimated 30-40% - one of the highest overvaluations in the world. Based on the IMF estimate of the price-to-rent ratio, it's 33 times more expensive to buy a property in the city than to rent.

When the last bubble burst in 1997 during the Asian financial crisis, Hong Kong's property prices fell by more than 60% and continued to decline for six years. Now, house prices are 13 times the average salary - higher than even during the last bubble.

The trouble with bubbly markets is that once interest rates rise - which is starting to happen with the US Fed reining back on its cheap cash injections as of this month - so does the risk of the bubble bursting.

Social impact

Hong Kong's sky-high property prices have a bigger social impact because public housing is inadequate - such housing only covers 30% of the population and is still expensive. Public housing residents in Hong Kong tell me that they pay as much as half of their income in rent.

By contrast, in Singapore, more than 80% of the population live in quality social housing that can be bought with a government-subsidised mortgage.

The subsidy comes from a person's own savings because it's drawn from the forced saving scheme known as the Central Provident Fund. Singaporeans put in about 20% of their wages into this government-run savings plan, with matching contributions by employers. The funds can then be used to finance a cheaper mortgage or health needs or retirement.

Global rich

But, the global rich can afford to buy pretty much anywhere in the world. The average price of an overseas home is $2m for the wealthy, who tend to buy with cash in places with a good quality of life and a favourable tax regime.

For the rest of us, it means that house prices are more out of reach if we live in a global property hot spot.

 
Linda Yueh Article written by Linda Yueh Linda Yueh Chief business correspondent

Beyond GDP: Well-being

The holidays are a good time to reflect on well-being. The ONS has done so, releasing an assessment of income that is intended to provide a more comprehensive picture of economic prosperity.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 145.

    What makes a hot spot.

    Well I am guessing a industry that attracts the worlds elite. So while there is stability when there is turmoil elsewhere they will always be safe havens for capital investment. If you have debt property seems expensive, if you have cash it it seems safe.

    Not to say that every now and then one falls

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 144.

    Countries like China are giving up vital agricultural land and sacrificing critical water resources to develop land into cities, industry, residences. Despite China's large area its arable land is relatively small compared to its population. It will become increasingly dependent on others not just for energy but for food and water.Too many people, bad use of land.Long term a fatal mistake

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 143.

    With an increasing world population, with some becoming far wealthier, the desire for a comfortable property & attractive investment is increasing. This will continue, with the detrimental impact it entails, until the world population begins to decrease. Until this happens the human race is destined for wars, greed & poverty except for the privileged minority.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 142.

    Justin Webb who admitted knowing nothing about America before he was assigned here lived in the US as BBC correspondent for a few years and became a self anointed expert. His favorite place was Des Moines Iowa. It was hard for him to go back to the UK but he felt that's where he wanted to grow old and die. Here's an interview.

    http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/312122-1&buy

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 141.

    Large cities are usually expensive places to live.With all of their shortcomings one that rarely gets mentioned is that in time of crisis they are deathtraps.In a natural catastrophe or a manmade attack evacuating a city on short notice is impossible.A million or more people want to get out at the same time and many have no idea where they want to get to.Since 9-11 I'm no fan of high rise bldgs.

 

Comments 5 of 145

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.