Hong Kong 0, New York 1?

Employee walks past Alibaba sign

Hong Kong has seemingly lost the biggest IPO since Facebook. The loss, though, may do more to bolster Hong Kong's reputation in the longer term.

China's Alibaba, the world's largest e-commerce company, has reportedly ended talks with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and will try to list in New York.

Think of Alibaba as Amazon, eBay, PayPal and Groupon all rolled into one. Its initial public offering could be bigger than Facebook, whose IPO valued it at $104.2bn (£65.2bn).

Alibaba's profits are 10 times that of Facebook, but it may be wary about repeating Facebook's post-IPO dive. Analysts estimate that it could be priced at $120bn or as low as $60bn - that is about 84 times estimated 2012 net income.

Alibaba was seeking an arrangement that would have allowed the executives to control a majority of board seats. So the founder Jack Ma with 7% of shares and his executives, who together hold about 10%, could have appointed five of the nine directors on the board.

Retaining control with a minority of shareholding is not allowed in Hong Kong in order to protect ordinary shareholders.

Dual class shares or other such arrangements where founders can retain control of a company is permitted in the US. Thus it looks like Alibaba is headed to New York unless talks can be revived.

It looks like the Hong Kong regulators stuck to their guns despite the risk of losing the listing. It is no doubt a blow, as Hong Kong is where large Chinese firms have listed since they were permitted to sell shares overseas. For instance, Alibaba's biggest competitor, Tencent Holdings - which is Facebook, Twitter, Zynga, and Tumblr all on the same platform - trades in Hong Kong.

But Hong Kong may be more worried about its longer term reputation.

By making an exception for Alibaba and allowing minority shareholders to control the company, a slew of Chinese companies would have followed.

Of the 2,500 companies that are listed on China's stock exchanges in Shanghai and Shenzhen, just a quarter or about 600 are private firms. The rest are state-owned with a minority of shares that are listed and can be publicly traded.

Hong Kong could have faced a large influx of Chinese state-owned firms that could have been overwhelming for the bourse. After all, Chinese state-owned firms are about half of the biggest companies in the world.

The ability for the state to retain control with a minority equity ownership would have proved attractive for some of the state-owned enterprises. But for shareholders in Hong Kong and globally, it may be less so. The principle of treating all shareholders equally is what the Hong Kong regulator is protecting.

For Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China, which has a 50-year "one country, two systems" policy since being handed back in 1997 from British rule, it is important that it signals to investors how it will operate.

By saying no to Alibaba, Hong Kong seems to be saying that it will retain its prudent regulatory system and protect shareholders even if it means losing the biggest tech IPO in the world.

But the story still has a long way to run, regulators do change, and an IPO of this size will be battled over undoubtedly for some time to come.

Linda Yueh Article written by Linda Yueh Linda Yueh Chief business correspondent

G20 summit: Much promised, less delivered

The G20 summit of world leaders has delivered more than expected on some issues, but somewhat less on others.

Read full article

More on This Story


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    Hong Kong wants to keep its prudent regulatory system so off they go to New York! So much for US prudence?

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    Says more about the market rather than the regulators, for if it were just the regulators I am sure they would have been "advised" to tow the line by Beijing

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    Alibaba the source of 99% of counterfeit goods in the west and on ebay, and we are legitimising it ?

    Why are we banning people from using torrents, sensoring the internet and letting Chinese traders rob people with counterfeit items.

    Punishing people of this country, while rewards people in China for the same thing?

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    Good for Hong Kong.. we taught them good money management and sound economic prinicples and its good to see that they are holding on to them when cheap, bad, debt ridden money is around.

    This will be VERY good for HK in the future, the internet dot com 2 is priming to burst right now.. just look at the p/e ratio and place your short

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    Good for them. Although its doubtful that they will be able to maintain that stance if they come under sustained pressure from the mainland authorities to allow it!
    Its a pity really that the other bourses dont follow suit in that regard.


Page 2 of 2



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.