Is the Fed frightened of its shadow?

Federal Reserve building in Washington DC

A week ago, a very successful and smart investor said to me that the debate over the Fed's taper - whether the world's most powerful central bank would start reducing its $85bn-per-month money creation programme - had turned into a big yawn.

It was perfectly obvious, he said, that Ben Bernanke and his crew would sit on their hands and do nothing.

How so, I asked? Surely unemployment was falling towards the 7% rate that is supposed to be the threshold for the end of those massive conversions of debt into money, and therefore the time had arrived for a first small reduction in the rate of money manufacturing.

"Ah, you are looking in the wrong place" he said. "Look at what's happening in the US housing market."

And here is where it all gets slightly surreal, and you may feel you are losing your mind.

As you will know, partly because I've been banging on about it for months, the mere expectation that the Fed would start to buy fewer bonds (it creates money by purchasing government bonds and mortgage-backed bonds issued by the official housing market agencies) had led to a fall in the price of those bonds.

When the price of those bonds falls, the yields on them rises. And the yield on those bonds are the most influential important interest rates in the US economy, which determine most other interest rates both in the US and the rest of the world.

Start Quote

If you think of the world's markets as a vast pond, a rise in US government-bond rates is a bit like chucking a stone the size of Ben Nevis into the middle of it”

End Quote

Or to put it another way, just the expectation - rather than the reality - that the Fed would create less money led to an increase of a full percentage point in arguably the world's most important interest rate, the US Treasury's 10-year bond.

Now if you think of the world's markets as a vast pond, this rise in US government-bond rates is a bit like chucking a stone the size of Ben Nevis into the middle of it. The ripples haven't quite been the size of tsunami, but they've been hair-raising for all the little boats floating on the pond.

So, for example, international investors, seeing that it is now possible to earn a more attractive return from investing in the world's biggest and (arguably) strongest economy, have taken a ton of money out of the supposedly riskier economies, most notably India - such that the currencies of the emerging economies have taken a hammering and the cost of money for them has in effect been raised significantly.

By the way, and to digress for a second, the sheer scale of US money creation, or quantitative easing, in the US has probably set back the cause of better co-ordinating the world's biggest economies by a generation - because all the world's rising economies in Asia and South America see is a US setting the price of money in a way that suits its domestic needs, and never mind the inconvenience and periodic shocks it causes them.

The point is that there is very little evidence that the Fed cares a fig about whether its rate of creating money is good or bad for the rest of the world.

It hasn't decided to keep up the pace of money creation to suit India.

So why has it decided not to taper at this juncture? Why hasn't it slowed the rate of money creation?

If you've been concentrating and have stuck with me, you've probably worked it out,

Ben Bernanke Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve Chairman

The expectation of less money being created led to a rise in US mortgage rates, which has already started to dampen the US housing market, which in turn is expected to dampen America's recovery.

To put it another way, the Fed simply hinting that less money would be created, means that there will be no reduction in the amount of money created (for now at least).

Trebles all round - the unprecedented monetary stimulus goes on, sine die, and debt and equity markets all over the world surge.

The economics of the mad house, you might mutter, I suppose. Is it healthy that the Fed appears to be frightened of its own shadow?

Well, only one member of the Federal Reserve Board - the collective Fed eminences that makes these monetary decisions - seems to fear that the longer the central bank goes on reinforcing the addiction of economy and markets to money creation, the harder it will be to go cold turkey

Esther George is recorded as being "concerned that the continued high level of monetary accommodation increased the risks of future economic and financial imbalances, and, over time, would cause an increase in long-term inflation expectations".

Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Will this be history's dullest budget?

The LibDems are intent on preventing George Osborne announcing any serious tax or spending reforms in the budget.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Robert


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 302.



    [Intent was to use little humour to highlight slightly sinister statement by Vince C this week. M-Hill example of relative poverty is, say, pensioner widow in house valued £2.1m. She would pay annual W-Tax of £1000. But Russian 'entrepreneur' with £5.5m Hampstead house would, despite what Vince said, probably pay £0 because house is 'owned' by a tax efficient 'vehicle'. ;-)]

  • rate this

    Comment number 301.

    The Federal Reserve is overrated. Ben Bernanke and his colleagues have inflicted terrible pain on the overwhelming majority of Americans. Wall Street is winning hands down. Main Street is still losing badly. Other countries should not blame their financial problems on America. Again the US Congress should abolish the Federal Reserve. Just let the markets determine interest rates!

  • rate this

    Comment number 300.

    In other words, this world has been turned into a pile of poo and we can only hope god will press the flush button again.

  • rate this

    Comment number 299.


    Funny no HYS about the tory financiers ripping off people enrolled into workplace pensions
    Check back Sun 10 Oct 2010 - Panorama did a program, the 'ethical' Co-op was one of the worst re charges.

  • rate this

    Comment number 298.

    either America is smarter than every other nation that has ever lived on this planet or it is simply the way of nature to distribute and redistribute power to different people at different times.
    would the romans have not laughed at you if you forewarned them of their impending doom?
    seriously though on whose behalf will the BBC bark if America loses its power.


Comments 5 of 302



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.