HS2 to boost UK economy 'by £15bn a year' says report

 

Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin: "The main reason we need HS2 is a heart bypass for the clogged arteries of our transport system"

Related Stories

A new report says the HS2 rail project could boost the UK economy by £15bn a year.

Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin presented the findings as he reasserted the case for the new rail line.

The report, from accountants KPMG, says that regions outside London will be the biggest beneficiaries of the new service.

But the economic boost will not be felt until 2037, it says.

In a speech at the Institute of Civil Engineers, Mr McLoughlin argued that rejecting HS2 would amount to a "national loss of nerve".

Start Quote

KPMG is ignoring one of the fundamental causes of lacklustre growth in many parts of the UK, which is a shortage of skilled labour and of easily and readily developable land”

End Quote

HS2 was necessary because the "clogged arteries" of the nation's transport system needed a "heart bypass", he said.

But Mark Littlewood, director general of the Institute of Economic Affairs, told the BBC: "Any private investor would consider this to be a colossal waste of money.

"That is not to say that we don't need to improve capacity. Rail is an extraordinarily expensive way of doing that."

The government was asking UK taxpayers to take "a huge gamble on their extremely dodgy numbers", he added.

'Stronger'

Mr McLoughlin argued that the benefits of HS2 were not simply faster journey times and new jobs, but up to 500,000 fewer lorry journeys a day on the country's roads, according to a separate report.

"High Speed Two will make Liverpool stronger. Manchester stronger. Leeds stronger. Britain stronger", he said.

"A £15bn annual boost to the economy. With the North and Midlands gaining at least double the benefit of the south."

Dismissing "scare stories" over the budget, he maintained that it would remain £42.6bn, with a contingency fund of £14.4bn.

But earlier this week, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) criticised the scheme, saying: "So far, the Department [of Transport] has made decisions based on fragile numbers, out-of-date data and assumptions which do not reflect real life."

The committee also said there was no evidence the line would help the growth of regional cities and would instead draw even more business to London.

KPMG's report was commissioned by HS2 Ltd, which is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the Department for Transport.

Report author Richard Threlfall, KPMG's head of infrastructure, said: "What I hope this work will do is put some new evidence into the debate, because what we've seen over the last few months is an awful lot of opinions and to be honest not a lot of evidence on the ground as to what effect this will have.

"And what our report shows, beyond any reasonable doubt, is that HS2 will deliver massive benefits to the UK economy."

Map showing the route of phase 1 & 2 of the proposed high-speed service
'Creaking'

John Longworth, director general of the British Chambers of Commerce, told the BBC: "Businesses up and down the country are absolutely convinced that this is a really important infrastructure project. It is one of the key infrastructure projects for the UK."

Analysis

This report tots up the benefits in a new way.

It analyses how better transport links have apparently fuelled business and productivity across various different cities, then applies that to HS2.

Saving time still plays a part, but it's a smaller part.

Instead, there's more importance placed on all those extra seats this scheme provides, not just on the new high speed trains, but on the rest of the rail network too (all those extra commuter services we're being promised).

Critics say the government is just moving the goalposts in a desperate bid to make its project look better.

He argued that simply renovating existing rail lines that were "creaking at the seams" would cause "chaos".

The latest study was commissioned by HS2 Ltd, the company responsible for developing and promoting the project.

It says Birmingham's economy could be boosted between 2.1% and 4.2% a year, while Manchester would benefit between 0.8% and 1.7%.

For Leeds, the boost would be 1.6% and London 0.5%.

Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen: "Enough is enough. This is tremendously bad value for money"

Wednesday's report calculates the benefits of the project in a different way from previous efforts.

Time saved is a less important part of the calculation. Instead, the report includes the benefits of extra seats, which means passengers will be able to work while travelling.

It also takes into account the reduction in congestion elsewhere on the network.

"The point about High Speed Two is that you won't have to travel on it to gain from the better transport system and economic growth it will support," he said.

The high-speed line would run between London and Birmingham from 2026 before being extended to Manchester and Leeds from 2033.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 1050.

    Here in Mid-Norfolk, our nearest mainline station is Norwich, a terribly slow line in desperate need of upgrade. How is HS2 going to help us?

    I'm all for public transport, but it needs to be good, reliable and low cost - none of that applies here. It is quicker and cheaper to drive to north London than take the train.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 1047.

    I'm really not against HS2 in principle, but the £32bn (oops sorry, now £42.6bn) price tag is completely unjustifiable. How on Earth can it cost such a crazy amount?
    Okay it was 2 decades ago, but even the massively over-buget Channel Tunnel was a tenth the price of HS2. And considering how quickly the price went up by £10bn, there's no chance it'll stay at £42.6bn. Where's the money going?

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 1040.

    I've just got off the Manchester to London 12:35 service. Travelled First Class Off-peak (about £120 return) so that I could work. There were three people in the carriage the entire way. Try working in economy - most seats don't have enough room to open a laptop. I have been off peak with economy packed as sardines and First half empty. Sort out how the train layout rather than waste £40b+.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 1025.

    Why does everybody think that HS2 will increase capacity between London and Birmingham. It doesn't stop anywhere in between so is only of benefit to people going from one city centre to the other, those poor souls who live in-between will face the same slog as before, and if there is no significant reduction in commuter trains, how is it going to remove 500,000 lorry journeys.

  • rate this
    +51

    Comment number 714.

    I believe HS2 will shave 20mins off a London-Birmingham trip but the train won't terminate at New St Station in Birmingham. If you want to travel north from Brum before (or if) the line is extended you'll have to walk across town to get to New St. Which, by the time you reach the Platform in New St for you connection will probably take around...20 minutes! What a waste of money for no benefit.

 

Comments 5 of 14

 

More Business stories

RSS

Features

  • Women doing ice bucket challengeChill factor

    How much has the Ice Bucket Challenge achieved?


  • Women in front of Windows XP posterUpgrade angst

    Readers share their experiences of replacing their operating system


  • Members of staff at James Stevenson Flags hold a Union Jack and Saltire flag UK minus Scotland

    Does the rest of the UK care if the Scots become independent?


  • Ernest Hemingway, as war correspondent, travelling with US soldiers to Normandy for the D-Day landingsAbandoned hero

    Why Paris is forgetting Ernest Hemingway


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.