China's debt problem

 
File photo: Money at a bank in China China's gross debt-to-GDP ratio is around 43%

China's new government has ordered a national audit of government borrowing and announced that it is adopting a budget deficit limit of 3% of GDP, similar to the Maastricht Treaty's guidelines for the eurozone. The first move is welcome, but has the latter gone down the wrong line?

China's government debt, especially local government debt, would benefit from greater transparency. In the last audit, local government debt came to 10.7 trillion yuan, or $1.8 trillion, which equates to about a quarter of GDP at the end of 2010.

And more debt has been accumulated since then. Also, it's unclear as to whether this really is the total amount since large portions are held off balance sheets in so-called local government financing vehicles.

Taken together with central government debt, China's gross debt-to-GDP ratio is around 43%, which isn't too bad considering that the average debt level for advanced economies in the US and Europe is over 80%. But there is a lot of doubt around these numbers and the estimates that I have been given by sources in the Finance Ministry are closer to 60%.

Also, it is often pointed out to me that the US only counts federal government debt and not state debt, so why wouldn't China follow suit? I'll come back to this point in a moment.

In any case, greater transparency is a welcome development, especially as the new government can do a bit of housecleaning as anxieties grow over China's ability to manage its debt.

US analogy

The deficit cap, though, may be more contentious. Such caps limit the counter-cyclical impact of government spending. In other words, in a recession, government spending on unemployment benefits rise. So, to keep within the 3% cap, other spending - like discretionary spending - will need to be cut.

Besides they don't seem to work very well. Capping the budget deficit at 3% of GDP is similar to what the eurozone has done. You may recall that it was broken first by the core countries of Germany and France soon after its adoption.

And though the deficit rule has been criticised in the euro area, it may make more sense in a single currency area, where different governments are attempting to straitjacket fiscal policy with shared monetary policy.

But coming back to that point, the closer analogy for China is the US.

Chinese provinces are more like US states in that there is a federal structure for revenues and spending rather than separate national entities like the euro area.

If China is worried about local government debt, it may be more pertinent to consider balanced budget restrictions. Three-quarters of US states aren't allowed to run a deficit.

Balanced budget amendments don't always work well in the US, but they came about after a century or so of America attempting to control state debt.

Just restricting the overall fiscal deficit doesn't quite address the problem.

 
Linda Yueh Article written by Linda Yueh Linda Yueh Chief business correspondent

Why markets fear Argentina's debt crisis

If Argentina defaults on its debts again, there could be major repercussions for the global bond market.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 121.

    China continues to dangerously overplay a weak hand.In Africa, elsewhere it's guilty of the same kind of imperial exploitation using local dictatorships as its agents as was used against it in the 19th century by Europe.Its territorial aggression would become comparable to Japan's in the 1930s left unchallenged and unchecked by the US.China has not learned from history playing a game it can't win.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 120.

    Instilling notions from an early age that are unspoken fences confining the free range of ideas because they're politically dangerous, taboos that are the chains on mental exploration because they carry consequences also chain the mind to explore and solve technical problems that lead to new scientific and engineering breakthroughs.China can't have it both ways.As it is, it will remain a laggard

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 119.

    That China would stoop so low to attack this web site and probably block access to it to Chinese citizens proves how weak and frightened its government really is.The Chinese government knows the facts and knows the long term outlook is bleak.And just when it was becoming apparent China's government was placed in the hands of inexperienced beginners.An ominous portent of future problems.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 118.

    B: 0.7% omg, almost stops growing
    R: 3.4% just okay, still livable
    I : 6.5% almost there, more effort
    C: 7.5% everyone is looking at you
    S: 2.5% hmm, no comment
    US: 2.2% looks´╗┐ normal in decades
    EU: -0.3% pack your bags, folks!

  • rate this
    -4

    Comment number 117.

    Amazing thing is so many economists have such narrow focus on a limited number and type of recent growth data alone that tunneled vision blinds them to the larger reality that must arrive at least at the possibility that China's growth rate is unsustainable.It's far more than likely, it's virtually certain.Normal accounting and management practice in China would frighten any investor in the West

 

Comments 5 of 121

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.