Rapid sale of 10% of Lloyds mooted

Chancellor at Lloyds cashpoint

The Treasury has received approaches from a series of sovereign wealth funds and private-equity businesses to buy around 10% of Lloyds, either just before or simultaneous with a more conventional placing of shares with investment institutions, I have learned.

Sources close to the Chancellor tell me George Osborne hasn't ruled out such a deal, which could be worth around £5bn, but would only do it if persuaded that the transaction represents conspicuous value for money for the taxpayer.

"There is a Gordon Brown`s gold issue here," said a source, referring to the criticism that dogged the former chancellor Gordon Brown that he sold too much of Britain's gold reserves too cheaply.

The Treasury is therefore looking for any buyer of the stake to pay a premium to the market price, which at the time of writing is 66p.

"Based on today's price, if someone offered 70p, we'd have to be interested" said a source.

'Rip off'

Start Quote

If we do a deal with one of these sovereign wealth or private equity firms, we need complete transparency on what we are selling and the price. Most of those buyers don't like that transparency”

End Quote

However another source said some of the bidders wanted a discount to the market price.

Also a large number of them did not want to buy the shares as shares, but wanted them repackaged into convertible bonds, similar to the method Barclays used to raise money from the Middle East after the crash of 2008.

"It would be a mistake to sell the shares in the form of bonds or in any way than in their plain vanilla form" said another source. "Anything that looks like complicated financial engineering would raise suspicions that the Treasury is being ripped off, and those suspicions would probably be right."

Another adviser to Mr Osborne said: "If we do a deal with one of these sovereign wealth or private equity firms, we need complete transparency on what we are selling and the price. Most of those buyers don't like that transparency. They are looking for a bargain, and want to hide the true commercial nature of the transaction through a complex structure."


If in the end a deal can be reached with a powerful state investor, such as the sovereign wealth funds of Norway or Singapore, or with a consortium of private equity investors, such as those put together in other contexts by Corsair, it could happen relatively quickly.

Sources have told me that such a transaction could take place not long after the summer - but would not give odds on it actually happening.

In his Mansion House speech to the City last month, the Chancellor gave the green light to the first stage of the privatisation of the Treasury's 39% stake in Lloyds, signalling that it would be initiated by a large placing of shares with mainstream investment institutions rather than retail investors, probably before the end of the year - so long as Lloyds' share price continues to rise.

Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Will this be history's dullest budget?

The LibDems are intent on preventing George Osborne announcing any serious tax or spending reforms in the budget.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Robert


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 86.

    81. Little_Old_Me
    "Gold prices are VERY volatile...."

    Ain't they though.

    Somehow Gordon Brown managed to pick pretty much the worst time in our lifetimes to sell Gold. I would love to know why. At best it's bad luck, but several other possible explanations are plausible.

    The lesson for the current Chancellor is to listen to expert opinion.

  • rate this

    Comment number 85.

    AllforAll @80
    between ignorance and corruption
    On reflection a midway point can be found and this relates to the degree of knowledge the actor has of what is going on. Full knowledge implies corruption and no knowledge implies ignorance.
    Some partial amount of knowledge would lead the actor to make a wrong choice.
    However this implies that our leaders are acting without full knowledge.

  • rate this

    Comment number 84.

    @83 John Campbell
    You are absolutely correct.
    Imagine if your broker invested your money into some enterprise and then withheld the gains that transpired for his own account.
    In these circumstances you would sue the broker and would certainly win.
    Why do we have such an unequal contract with our government?

  • rate this

    Comment number 83.

    Have to assume that these Banks were saved by the injection of Public Money. If this is wrong...then yes.. let the people taking the risk,.make the profits..
    Or.if it was Public Funds that saved the Banks...would it not make sense to give Taxpayers a share of any profits?

  • rate this

    Comment number 82.

    AllforAll @ 80
    determined idiocy somewhere between ignorance and corruption
    how to get to that doctrine of the mean when dealing with that slippery "virtue" of determined idiocy.
    It is such an unlikely collision.
    And ignorance and corruption are so wide apart as well.
    One has to choose one or the other.
    There appears to be no midway point between the two.


Comments 5 of 86



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.