Lord Lawson's argument with business

Nigel Lawson

Naturally most coverage of Lord Lawson's euro-Damascene moment in the Times has focussed on who he is - one of the two most influential chancellors of modern times - rather than what he says.

So what about the content of his argument that the UK would now be better off outside of the European Union.

Perhaps his most interesting point is this one:

"Too much of British business and industry feels... secure in the warm embrace of the European single market and is failing to recognise that today's great export opportunities lie in the developing world, particularly in Asia."

In other words, he is not claiming that those who run our companies agree with him that exit from the EU is optimal for them or the economy.

As it happens, those who run our biggest companies would tend to be horrified at the idea of withdrawal from the EU.

Our multinationals, unlike those of Switzerland, increasingly think of themselves as global corporate citizens, as much as British citizens. And whether they started life as British or not, they have a mindset that they are in Britain because it is an attractive place to be located within the EU.

Bosses of big banks and financial institutions would have this European mindset in spades. And many of them would take serious issue with Lord Lawson's idea that they would be liberated to thrive again, outside of the supposedly deadening clutches of EU financial reform and its planned new tax on financial transactions.

Since the crash of 2008, they've felt - if anything - more bashed and battered by UK regulators and politicians than by EU ones. And Lord Lawson, with his partly successful campaign to reinforce barriers between retail and investment banking operations, would not be seen by them as a champion of City laissez faire.

Of course smaller companies, including smaller City ones, are more patriotic in a conventional sense. But right now and in recent years they have been less important to British economic performance than the giant companies - although the government is desperate for smaller business to increase its relative output and influence.

I am not sure whether it is a paradox or not, but smaller and medium-size companies in the UK, which tend to have more eurosceptic bosses than bigger companies, are less important to British prosperity than smaller companies in Italy or Germany, for example.

All that said, the consensus of those in charge of businesses large and tiny would be for changing the terms of EU membership, to reduce the regulatory burden on them (yes, I know you know this).

In other words, they are hoping that David Cameron succeeds in his ambition of scaling back aspects of EU rules and regulations that they see as undermining their competitiveness.

Start Quote

Lawson's claim [is] that ease of trading with the EU... prevents British businesses working hard enough to gain access to the faster growing markets of Asia and Latin America”

End Quote

Lord Lawson, never one to mince his opinions, thinks the prime minister will fail, and that - anyway - companies are wrong to place their faith in him.

But let's return to Lawson's claim, that ease of trading with the EU damages the UK because it somehow prevents British businesses working hard enough to gain access to the faster growing markets of Asia and Latin America.

If there is something in this, one important question is why it doesn't apply to Germany - whose exports to China, per capita, are more than four times the UK's.

However, it is important to note that ease of access to the EU market has not been an unalloyed boon for the UK.

For years, the UK has run a significant current account deficit with the rest of the EU. In other words, our business with the EU has contributed fairly significantly to the growing indebtedness of the UK, at a time when many would say the debt burden on the UK is unsustainably high (and, to remind you, I am talking here about the aggregate of household, business, financial sector and government debt - not public sector debt in isolation).

Of course there has been an enormous deficit in British trade with China. But the UK's consistent surplus with the US shows that Britain isn't doomed to be constantly in the red with economies regarded as formidable.

Margaret Thatcher and Nigel Lawson in 1989 Margaret Thatcher and Nigel Lawson in 1989

For decades, and pretty consistently since the UK joined the European Common Market, the EU's previous incarnation in 1973, the UK has been a deficit nation in its trading relationship with the rest of the world as a whole rather than a surplus nation.

Some would argue that the biggest problem currently faced by the UK is its failure since the great crash of 2008 to start generating a current account surplus, in spite of sharp falls in the value of sterling that should have made UK exports more competitive - because with the current account deficit bigger than at any time since 1989, it is impossible for the overall indebtedness of the UK economy to shrink.

The European Commission itself forecasts that the UK will continue to be a significant net borrower from the rest of the world for at least the next couple of years (at a rate of 2.5% of GDP in 2013 and 1.8% next year - compared with 3.5% in 2012).

So maybe Lord Lawson can be seen as kicking off an important debate, which is whether the UK will find it easier to start paying its way in the world on the inside - or the outside - of the EU.

Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Can Labour pay for university fee cut?

We may be about to learn how much of a constraint Labour's promise to make no unfunded spending promises really is.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Robert


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 15.

    I live in Bulgaria and this morning my wife and I went shopping in a supermarket then an electrical store. German goods are everywhere, as are some French and Italian goods. It is also easy to buy Bulgarian and Romanian products, but British produce is much more difficult to find. We must stop the current economic strategy, manufacture more, and encourage our salesmen to go out and sell!

  • rate this

    Comment number 34.

    We are our own worst enemy. It's how we interpret EU laws. For instance other EU states do not pay benefits to EU migrants,yet we do.
    Because we class them as being resident in the UK,and not employed in the UK, they can claim for their kids in their home country.

  • rate this

    Comment number 12.

    For a supposed economic expert Lawson's arguments are tosh. You can only sell products if people want to buy them - that's what the Germans do so well. It has nothing as all to do with being in or out of the EU. How can it? Its a bit rich for a man who oversaw the wide scale destruction of British industry in the 1980's to lecture us now on what is best for it now.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    The EU promotes business with China and the emerging economies he talks about - he is out of touch.
    You only have to go to China and see all the EU companies doing business there. Sadly The UK is at the lower end of EU exporters. That is a UK problem not an EU one.

  • rate this

    Comment number 31.

    The reason why British companies have failed to seize opportunities is because:
    - They're managed by people selected above all by having the right connections, not competence
    - The UK's legal and regulatory environment that props-up big companies actually makes then less able to compete in places where they have no such advantages
    - Most UK companies are middlemen and don't actually make anything


Comments 5 of 664



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.