UK GDP: Questions for Mr Osborne in Davos


George Osborne: "We have the right deficit reduction plan"

I asked George Osborne three questions this morning, minutes after the latest GDP figures came out. He only answered one of them.

He admitted that the figures weren't good. You could say his general tone came under the heading of "disappointed, but not surprised".

But he made clear that there would be no change to the government's strategy in response to this news. Quite the opposite.

"We can run away from our problems or we can confront them - and we're going to confront them."

That was the question he answered. In response to my second question, he did not take the opportunity to agree with Nick Clegg's recent suggestion that the coalition (and Labour) had cut capital spending too fast in the early part of the austerity programme.

Mr Osborne did agree that capital investment was important, noting the extra capital spending that had been put back into the budget since 2011. But, he said, restoring confidence in 2010 was important too. In other words, he deflected the question.

Nothing surprising in that, you might say. It's the job of a politician to say what he or she wants to say in these interviews, regardless of what they are asked. And the chancellor is very good at it.

But his failure to answer my last question did surprise me.

I asked him whether he was going to follow the advice that the IMF's chief economist, Olivier Blanchard, had given, in a BBC interview with Simon Jack - to use the Budget to rethink at least some of the austerity planned for this year.

I fully expected the chancellor to respond by saying that Mr Blanchard did not speak for the Fund - and the IMF was still 100% behind the government's plans. That is what has happened when the French economist has raised doubts about the UK in the past.

But he didn't do that. He said the government's strategy had not changed. And he noted that a former chief economist of the IMF, Ken Rogoff, had said only this week that he fully supported the coalition's plan. So, that's a former chief economist he mentioned. Not the current one. Or the IMF as a whole.

Privately, Mr Osborne's advisors insist that "the IMF's advice for the UK has not changed". That's true. The Fund says that too. Their broad support for the government's approach still stands.

But, as I pointed out earlier this week, one part of the IMF's advice last summer was quite consequential for Mr Osborne, and specific. It said last summer that the consolidation plans for 2013-14 "would need to be scaled back if growth does not build momentum by early 2013".

Mr Blanchard stood by that advice in his BBC interview: "If things look bad at the start of the year... and they do....there should be a reassessment of fiscal policy in the Budget".

So, what have we learned this morning? We've learned that the economy is flat, at best. We have also learned that the IMF's advice for the UK has not changed. It is, however, starting to diverge from Mr Osborne's.

Stephanie Flanders Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article

More on This Story


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 50.

    Crash Gordon ruinuse spending spending spending is well and truely
    coming home to roost

    The man should be put on trail for Treason for missue of public funds

    particulary the CVF (Carriers) to buy jobs in his home consitunecy, a programme he spent 10 years avoiding to do until it was plain he would loose the election

  • rate this

    Comment number 20.

    Don't know why anyone is surprised at these numbers, we've had 13 years of mis-management from Labour and it'll take 13 years at least to fix that. We've got 7 years of pain to address Labour's failings. The next step will be to leave the EU.

  • rate this

    Comment number 125.

    @81. Ghandi
    "The biggest failure of the Tory austerity plan is that it has singularly FAILED to bring the deficit down - it has, in fact, GONE UP!"

    It has gone done but it has gone up this year alone. The country are still about 40bn for the better since 2010

    What surprising is people expect that this government can somehow clear up 13 years of Labours reckless spending in 2.5 years. No chance!!

  • rate this

    Comment number 252.

    It really is pathetic that the BBC continue to give negative news headline status and good news, such as the recent unemployment figures barely a passing thought. It leads me to questions the economic knowledge of the BBC and some might say their political affiliations.

  • rate this

    Comment number 51.

    Well Miss Flanders what would you do and how would you fund this deficite and recovery? please do tell? I dont particularly like the chancellor's pollitics, but at least he has reduced the deficite, like it or not,a fact is a fact. even when the Government came to office they stated that this economic situation would last for many years to come... so let hear your solution!


Comments 5 of 541



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.