UK GDP: Questions for Mr Osborne in Davos

 

George Osborne: "We have the right deficit reduction plan"

I asked George Osborne three questions this morning, minutes after the latest GDP figures came out. He only answered one of them.

He admitted that the figures weren't good. You could say his general tone came under the heading of "disappointed, but not surprised".

But he made clear that there would be no change to the government's strategy in response to this news. Quite the opposite.

"We can run away from our problems or we can confront them - and we're going to confront them."

That was the question he answered. In response to my second question, he did not take the opportunity to agree with Nick Clegg's recent suggestion that the coalition (and Labour) had cut capital spending too fast in the early part of the austerity programme.

Mr Osborne did agree that capital investment was important, noting the extra capital spending that had been put back into the budget since 2011. But, he said, restoring confidence in 2010 was important too. In other words, he deflected the question.

Nothing surprising in that, you might say. It's the job of a politician to say what he or she wants to say in these interviews, regardless of what they are asked. And the chancellor is very good at it.

But his failure to answer my last question did surprise me.

I asked him whether he was going to follow the advice that the IMF's chief economist, Olivier Blanchard, had given, in a BBC interview with Simon Jack - to use the Budget to rethink at least some of the austerity planned for this year.

I fully expected the chancellor to respond by saying that Mr Blanchard did not speak for the Fund - and the IMF was still 100% behind the government's plans. That is what has happened when the French economist has raised doubts about the UK in the past.

But he didn't do that. He said the government's strategy had not changed. And he noted that a former chief economist of the IMF, Ken Rogoff, had said only this week that he fully supported the coalition's plan. So, that's a former chief economist he mentioned. Not the current one. Or the IMF as a whole.

Privately, Mr Osborne's advisors insist that "the IMF's advice for the UK has not changed". That's true. The Fund says that too. Their broad support for the government's approach still stands.

But, as I pointed out earlier this week, one part of the IMF's advice last summer was quite consequential for Mr Osborne, and specific. It said last summer that the consolidation plans for 2013-14 "would need to be scaled back if growth does not build momentum by early 2013".

Mr Blanchard stood by that advice in his BBC interview: "If things look bad at the start of the year... and they do....there should be a reassessment of fiscal policy in the Budget".

So, what have we learned this morning? We've learned that the economy is flat, at best. We have also learned that the IMF's advice for the UK has not changed. It is, however, starting to diverge from Mr Osborne's.

 
Stephanie Flanders, Economics editor Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 541.

    BBC as the Guardian of Socialist Propaganda doesn't understand 'prudence' anymore than gordo cuckoo brown clown.
    BBC thinks 'prudence' is digging into our current accounts every month with a big fat direct debit steal.
    Prudent George is clearing up the Labour mess as will take 25 years in the terms Brown Clown Gordo set out as Chancellor in July 1997 as pro rata to a 1997 govt deficit of 25 Bn

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 540.

    @538.Little_Old_Me

    On black wednesday I watched the fiasco unfold, news footage showed traders gasping as interest rate rose to 15%.

    The event irreparably damaged Tory standing, they were doomed from the start for joining ERM, & Labour was even more keen to join, including EURO later. Other countries also crashed out. On analysis what would we or any critic have done differently at the time?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 539.

    @538.Little_Old_Me

    Thanks for response & reference, the phrase is balanced budget. Ken Clarke often referred to surplus & never challenged by Labour, even Gordon Brown factored in for growth figures that covered financial quarters under Tory admin.

    debt as % of GDP is itself dependent on GDP, which may exploit growth in financial sectors & property: not copping out but too many terms undefined.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 538.

    533.chinkinthearmour - "Gordon Brown inherited a balanced budget from Ken Clark, was tied to Tory policies for at least a year & thereafter continued with them......"

    No they didn't - remember how much Black Wednesday/leaving the ERM cost us...???


    Check out claim 2 here - Lab REDUCED the Tory deficit:


    http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ramesh-patel/growth-cameron-austerity_b_2007552.html

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 537.

    536.voice-of-rationality


    Indeed - the number of kids my (step) grandkids age that, despite having degrees & good jobs & being DINKs can't afford to buy a house round here......

 

Comments 5 of 541

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.