Cars bring more exports than jobs

 
MG production line

The renaissance in Britain's car industry has been a beacon of hope in an economy that has been broadly flat for the best part of two years.

Economically, it is good news on a number of fronts if companies like Jaguar Land Rover do well.

It can help rebalance the UK economy by increasing our manufacturing output and our exports. As we've heard today, it can also create high quality jobs, and send a message to the world that at least some British workers have the skills to compete on a global stage.

But we shouldn't be under too many illusions: even if manufacturing companies like Jaguar can help increase UK exports, many economists doubt they can be a major source of new jobs over the long term.

Why? Because to succeed in the global manufacturing industry, you have to be extraordinarily efficient. That means employing fewer and fewer people to make the same amount of stuff.

Shrinking employment

There are now around 145,000 people working directly for UK car manufacturers. That is barely 0.5% of the workforce, but between them they produce around 11% of Britain's exports (plus a lot of cars and engines for the domestic market as well). Around 80% of cars produced in the UK are exported.

If all UK manufacturers were anything like this successful, we might well have a lot more exports. We would not necessarily have a lot more jobs. In fact, we might well have a lot fewer.

That's because most UK companies would have to shed workers to produce as much value added, per employee, as the car industry does today.

Higher productivity does not have to mean fewer jobs, if demand is going up at the same time.

But world-beating manufacturers are so productive, most economists think we would be lucky to see the total number of UK manufacturing jobs go up over the next few years, even if the economy does rebalance, and we achieve rising manufacturing exports.

In fact, even stable employment in this sector would be a big break with the past. The number working in manufacturing fell by another 1.4 million between 2000 and 2010. That's 10 years in which the number of jobs across the economy rose by more than 1.7 million.

Manufacturing has been doing a bit better since the financial crisis, and the arrival of a more competitive currency, but of the nearly 560,000 jobs created since the summer of 2010, only 26,000 (5%) have been in this part of the economy.

Exciting spin-offs

Of course, there are lots of other jobs - in retailing and other parts of the economy - which dependent on those manufacturing companies.

The SMMT estimates there were 737,000 jobs, across the economy, that were dependent in one way or another on the automotive sector in 2010 (the most recent year we have detailed figures for).

That is a lot. But, by the SMMT's own admission, it is 131,000 fewer than in 2005.

The value of UK automotive exports rose 22% between 2005 and 2010 - from £23.7bn to £29bn in 2010. Total output in this sector rose by a similar amount. Despite that, employment fell. You could produce similar statistics for nearly all of the most successful manufacturers in the UK.

As I said at the start, it's great news if car companies - and other manufacturers - are making and selling more in the UK. Their success can produce a lot of positive spin-offs for local economies, and for the country as a whole. It can also produce highly valuable skilled jobs.

But, even with exciting modern developments such as 3D printing, it is difficult to believe we will see a big rise in UK manufacturing employment over the next few years - even if we do see that long-awaited rebalancing, and exports and output take off.

The lesson of the UK car industry is that you can do very well indeed in the global economy without employing very many people at all.

 
Stephanie Flanders Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 140.

    #129 Agree to a large extent, ironically some of the companies who moved manufacturing units from UK to East Europe didn't get the predicted ROI (for redundancies & relocation) as salaries increased quicker than the business plan had allowed for, unfortunately skills & apprenticeships had been lost...oh & maybe some of the mgrs who drafted the business plans promoted. Fingers crossed 4 Brit SMEs!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 139.

    The point which Stephenie is making is that even if manufacturing output were to increase substantially it would not lead to a net increase in jobs.
    What will happen is that the value of manufacturing output will increase but with a progressively smaller workforce as has happened in almost every year since 1945.
    She is right.
    But it will lead to more net exports.
    Alan

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 138.

    Having spent most of my working life, in manufacturing, advocating the growth of manufacturing and being a productivity specialist, the re-balancing of the economy is vital to the UK and move the emphasis away from “value consuming” retail and costly “middle man” service industries and back to “value added” manufacturing activities.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 137.

    The increase in manufacturing in the UK would add many thousands of jobs and create value for the country, however, manufacturing requires skills and trades that far exceed the ability and training of most of the UK’s (favourite) “retail industry" workers and will require many people to be re-trained.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 136.

    The comment that “145,000 people working directly for UK car manufacturers. That is barely 0.5% of the workforce, but between them they produce around 11% of Britain's exports” is a twist of statistics. Car manufacturers such as Honda and Jaguar are just assembly plants and as such are just the end of a very complex manufacturing supply chain employing many thousands of workers

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 135.

    @132 EB
    You could be right. Also have a notion that they were/have been shedding jobs; certainly in Nottingham. Think they were/are looking for new UK HQ site

    But ... founded in UK ... employing lots in UK! Well, more than JLR, anyway. ;-)

    Whose success I celebrate! :-)

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 134.

    123.fallingTP - ".......It was only through economic growth that England could afford to not use children. Child labour evaporated as prosperity spread down to the workign classes. this was made possible not by altruism but by capitalism"


    True to a large extent but you missed 2 important words out - before the 'captilism' you should have added 'well regulated'....

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 133.

    I think Stephanie is mixing motor manufacturing up with motor assembly, and that's why there are relatively few jobs being created in that sector. We need to start the process of regaining all the skills that we have lost in this country that support manufacturing properly, this will employ more people than any service or assembly operation could.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 132.

    #130 Up2Snuff - Isn't Boots now a foreign company with a PO Box as their headquarters in the Swiss tax-haven canton of Zug?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 131.

    124Fatcatboys
    There's nothing to stop a "british" firm from expanding or even moving abroad.
    It's not an option which is only open to "foreign" firms.
    As I have said many British firms have operations abroad and indeed the value of foreign investments by British firms is greater than the sum of investments in the UK by foreign firms.
    Anyway what is a British firm?
    Alan

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 130.

    @114 WANAITT
    JLR may be Indian owned now but it was not Indian founded nor is it, I think, the largest private UK employer.

    I think John Lewis & Boots compete for that crown, employing about 70,000.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 129.

    125 Outsourcing skilled jobs by large and medium sized corps as recommended starting in the early 1980 has had unintended consequences.Since the outsourcing companies have to compete with each other they can't afford to train anyone who hasn't got the required skills already.The carreer path to acquire them even for degreed engineers no longer exists.These skills are not easily or quickly learned

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 128.

    Productivity creates value which in turn creates jobs. More such virtual circles are required.

    Employment is a lot more than putting bums on seats. If that were the route to wealth then this country would be paradise.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 127.

    People need Jobs.
    If one system fails another has to be tried.
    Unless the intention is to cut adrift half the population.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 126.

    114 Wanaitt
    I'm aware that Jaguar Landrover is a subsidiary of Tata an Indian multi-national company.
    I'm also aware that it has invested heaviliy in the UK, created many jobs and lots of exports.
    I take my hat of to them.
    They've made a better fist of it than when under British management and control.
    However the company is not owned nor was it started by an immigrant to the UK.
    Alan

  • Comment number 125.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 124.

    Britain hasn't got a car industry any more. Every single one is foreign-owned.

    We are renting and eventually sites will be moved overseas to cheaper locations.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 123.

    122 All poor socities have used child labour; In Vistorian England is was not a measure of how caring or otehrwise it was; it was a measure of how poor it was. It was only through economic growth that England could afford to not use children. Child labour evaporated as prosperity spread down to the workign classes. this was made possible not by altruism but by capitalism

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 122.

    34.fallingTP

    Oh yes, because we had such a caring and altruistic society in the Victorian times. Like children working long hours in factories and such like.

    Your frequent references to North Korea/Russia typically demonstrate shallow understanding of the general argument being discussed. If it doesn't fit your theory it must be wrong...

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 121.

    118. Maluthusian mantra has everything to do with the politics of the environmental movement.

 

Page 1 of 7

 

Features

  • Peaky Blinders publicity shotBrum do

    Why is the Birmingham accent so difficult to mimic?


  • Oliver CromwellA brief history

    The 900-year-story behind the creation of a UK parliament


  • Image of Ankor Wat using lidarJungle Atlantis

    How lasers have revealed an ancient city beneath the forest


  • TheatreBard taste? Watch

    Are trailer videos on social media spoiling theatre?


  • Agents with the US Secret Service, such as this one, are responsible for guarding the presidentHard at work

    White House break-in adds to Secret Service woes


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.