Britain’s investment crisis


There are a number of complementary explanations for why economic recovery in Europe since the crash of 2007/8 has been so much weaker than was expected by governments - such as the necessary and inevitable shrinkage of the banking sector and the crisis in the eurozone.

But one of the most important causes, highlighted in a new report by McKinsey, is that there has been what it calls "an unprecedented weakness in private investment".

McKinsey says: "The fall in private investment between 2007 and 2011 was larger than any previous decline in absolute terms and four times the decrease in real GDP over the same period."

Which isn't very cheery.

We have felt the impoverishing impact of this investment slump here in Britain.

A few months after the last general election and the coalition government's first budget, the newly created Office for Budget Responsibility was forecasting that business investment would grow by 8.6% in 2011 and 8.4% in 2012, underpinning economic growth in those years of 2.1% and 2.6%.

In fact, business investment grew by just 2.9% last year, a third of the forecast rate, and is expected to increase by 3.8% in 2012 - which is one reason why the economy expanded by less than 1% in 2011 and is set to shrink this year.

Some of this weakness in investment in the UK can perhaps be seen as bad luck: it is difficult to blame the David Cameron and his colleagues for the mess in the eurozone, which has so shaken business confidence.

Also, a good deal of the investment squeeze is the poisonous legacy of the recklessness of banks in the boom years, which lent unprecedented and ludicrous sums to over-indebted property developers. The bust in property development was probably impossible to temper.

But that is not to absolve the government of all responsibility for the weakness of investment.

McKinsey points out that it is very unusual for a surge in investment to be the initial driver of economic recovery. It is typically a revival in consumption that provides the initial fuel.

But on this occasion, consumers have been unable to provide that fuel - partly because they are more indebted than they've ever been, and many of them want to save rather than spend, and partly because of the squeeze on their spending power from an increase in food and energy prices at a time of stagnation in earnings.

For the avoidance of doubt, ministers in this government have consistently and repeatedly told me that the British economy had become far too dependent in the boom years on consumer spending - and they recognised that a rebalancing towards investment was essential.

So although another of the Office for Budget Responsibility's forecasting booboos was to anticipate faster growth in consumer spending than has materialised, ministers were well aware that they could not count on the behaviour of consumers to lead the UK back to prosperity.

What the McKinsey report implies is that the government has done far too little to encourage an increase in business investment. And government officials, in their less guarded moments, pull their hair out and agree.

The problem is that the sort of thing that would lead to an economically meaningful increase in investment by big companies - which, as you will recall, are sitting on almost record amounts of cash - are in the box labelled "politically horrendous".

Here is a verbatim list of what one influential official believes the government needs to do:

1. Place fewer restrictions on immigration, especially of those with skills (and McKinsey adds that "there is evidence that immigration limits inhibit the expansion of the university sector");

2. Get going on the building of new airport runways in the south;

3. Abolish planning restrictions far more than has been done and be much less worried about building on the Green Belt.

This is how McKinsey puts it. "Even in the short term - and in today's weak demand conditions - government could unlock private investment by removing regulatory barriers that currently stand in the way."

But that is much easier to do in countries like Italy and Spain, whose markets are subject to many more restrictive practices than is true of British markets, than in the UK.

Over here, removal of the residual and significant regulatory barriers - such as who can come to Britain or where and how it is possible to build - is seen by influential groups of voters as a full frontal attack on the British way of life.

Which implies not that the government is powerless to spur investment and growth, just that it requires them to embrace the politics of confrontation in a way that has not been seen in this country since Mrs Thatcher.

Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

How Labour pays for student fee cut

Labour would reduce tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more a year, shrink maximum pension pots to £1m and cut maximum annual pension contributions to £30,000 to pay for a cut to £6,000 in student fees.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Robert


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 241.

    #241 David Lilley

    Senior Executives from the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street and outside independent banking experts, seemed to agree with the idea of an Inquiry, when interviewed by Radio 4's programme, "Pension off the Old Lady!"

    A 1930s US Pecora Commission style UK Royal Commission of Inquiry on causes of the financial crisis, credit crunch and recession it is, then!

    One hitch - Downing St!

  • rate this

    Comment number 240.

    We reject 1, 2 and 3 above. We answer the Queen by having a Royal Inquiry into the cause of the "Debt Crisis". We call it the "Debt Crisis" which led to a financial crisis and the credit crunch. We recognise that 10 years of leveraging will be met by 10 years of deleveraging. But we also recognise that we can break the cycle by supporting immediate weath generation.

  • rate this

    Comment number 239.

    I may live in a world of my own but I share with others that I am not spending.

    If we are not spending because we cannot afford to or are deleveraging then demand is low and investment is low. Even investment of 2.9% is rather replacement of broken hardware rather than meeting non-existent growth.

  • rate this

    Comment number 238.

    Retail banks have put consumer borrowers under pressure, reducing disposable incomes by increasing mortgages lending rates; average differentials between BoE base rates & mortgages increased from 0.3% in 2007 to nearly 4% now.

    Banks are repairing balance sheets, particularly on commercial real estate clients' lending.

    An equity participation approach to financing small & medium co's is needed.

  • rate this

    Comment number 237.

    235. Large % of people own their home outright (31%). Just 33% of households have a mortgage. So whilst the affect may be to lower house prices, or at least hold prices, the majority of the population will not face issues in terms of mortgage to equity. Building mor houses wil also help to reduce costs of renting; surely a good thing.

  • rate this

    Comment number 236.

    @235 M.Tom
    Only when you have built so many that there is oversupply. If you noticed the Census info released this week you'll realise oversupply is a long way off ...

    Debt plus graft & craft creates growth.
    And the world flourishes.
    Real growth, not illusory growth.
    Only when it isn't eaten by Govt or others: ref. no gas price fall in UK {today's news!}

  • rate this

    Comment number 235.

    9 Justin 150.
    Let me see - you want to build more houses which will presumably reduce the price of current properties which will lead to further de-leveraging which will lead to further demands from the financial sector for more money which will leave less money for housing purchases...
    The only way to get rid of the problem is to get rid of the problem - we seem intent on preventing any recovery.

  • rate this

    Comment number 234.


    Yup, the boy Gideon set up the PBR with much fanfare to get better forecasts.....yet the OBR has proved one of the worst forecasting agencies ever......not surprising when our work experience Chancellor hand picked the members.....

  • rate this

    Comment number 233.

    If there was something worth investing in then investors would invest. While assets are kept high by money printing and low interest rates we will be stuck in Zombie land for ever

  • rate this

    Comment number 232.

    Knock. KNOCK. Knock. "Open up, HMRC!“

    “Go away. I'm a capitalist"

  • rate this

    Comment number 231.

    Eric, have a banana.

    Do not pass go, enjoy your next stock holders meeting. You may require tests for early stages of mental dysfunction and enter history and records books. Is your favorite color brown.

    ps Turn off the air circulation.

    You gotta fight for rite to par three!

    Very well done. Excellent. You may begin wearing fried egg, soft not runny and placed upon your rather empty head

  • rate this

    Comment number 230.

    Famous last quotes~ “I am very proud of the structure that we set up. We did it based on the incentives that the governments offered us to operate.“ “It’s called capitalism. We are proudly capitalistic. I’m not confused about this.“

    ~ Eric Schmidt, Google’s Chairman, defending the moral choice 'for' corporate tax avoidance.

  • Comment number 229.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this

    Comment number 228.

    Well, l never ~

    The European Commission has adopted an Action Plan outlining future initiatives in the areas of company law and corporate governance.

    Why should institutional investors be obliged to provide information about their voting and engagement policies?

    Why has the Commission presented an Action Plan on Tax fraud and evasion?

  • rate this

    Comment number 227.

    Google’s Chairman confirmed the company had no intention of paying more to the UK exchequer. Documents show Google generated around £2.5bn in UK sales last year paying £6m in corporation tax. The search giant also revealed nearly $10bn of its revenues in Bermuda to avoid some $2bn in worldwide income taxes in 2011.

    TIme to search up a new search engine. Ho hum....

  • rate this

    Comment number 226.

    #193. onward-ho

    Spivs or no spivs. What matters is that some folk take advantage of others.

    They take advantage. The cream. Whilst others do the work, for a pittance.

    Some say this is the way things work. Some people require leaders.
    I say those leaders are simply taking advantage.

    Why not have leaders that actually have the interests of their followers close to their hearts?

  • rate this

    Comment number 225.

    "... be much less worried about building on the Green Belt."

    Makes me want to vomit! Will we ever learn to cure our addiction to money? Greed. Pure and simple. This is why we are in such a "bad" way as an economy. But hey, we don't need green spaces to walk in, or for our children to enjoy, we don't need wildlife corridors, we don't need nature, do we? After all, we can pay to watch it online...

  • rate this

    Comment number 224.

    Global credit hedge funds with asian presence outperformed. $850m Algebris Coco Credit Fund, which invests in contingent convertible bonds regulators have earmarked as a vital part of bank buffers against future losses, returned gross 56% per London based Algebris Investments with $1.1bn assets.

  • rate this

    Comment number 223.

    Asian hedge funds managed $128 billion as of October, compared with $366 billion in Europe and $1.22 trillion in North America, Eurekahedge data show. Investors have withdrawn about $1 billion this year from hedge funds in Asia, according to Eurekahedge.

    Asia funds staged a comeback after the Fed’s QE boosted stock prices in the region where half of assets are focused on equities.


  • rate this

    Comment number 222.

    #220 onward-ho

    we never stopped believing in our ability to produce for ourselves, we go tired of producing for the man when he started getting greedy and demanded more and more.

    Spending feeds the beast.

    So we #STOPped.

    We can (and will) endure a decade (and more) of financial repression.

    There is no going back, TPTB have set the train in motion, the pikes have been ordered.

    Sow and Reap


Page 1 of 13



  • Mukesh SinghNo remorse

    Delhi bus rapist says victim shouldn't have fought back

  • Aimen DeanI spied

    The founder member of al-Qaeda who worked for MI6

  • Before and after shotsPerfect body

    Just how reliable are 'before and after' photos?

  • Woman with closed eyeStrange light show

    What do you see when you close your eyes?

  • Sony WalkmanLost ideas

    What has happened to Japan's inventors?

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.