Why is America's fiscal cliff more worrying than Europe's?

 
Anti-austerity protesters outside the Greek parliament The programme for Greece debated by eurozone ministers involves spending cuts and tax rises worth 7% of GDP in 2013-14

Like many European politicians, finance ministers meeting in Brussels on Tuesday are worried about the US heading over a fiscal cliff next year. For good reason, you might say: given a fragile recovery, all of us in Europe are now unusually dependent on US growth.

As I discussed last week, there's reason to expect a solution to America's cliff, though not necessarily a pretty one.

The big questions now are whether Congress and the president will reach a deal before, or soon after, the Bush-era tax cuts expire at the end of the year; and whether rich households end up paying higher marginal tax rates, or just getting fewer deductions. Republicans seem resigned to smaller deductions, but not to higher rates.

But critics of eurozone austerity programmes can't help seeing a rich irony in German politicians fretting about accidental tax rises and spending cuts in the US. Aren't they the ones who've been insisting that large parts of the eurozone head over their own fiscal cliff, entirely on purpose?

Think about it: America's budget deficit in 2012 will be 8.7% of GDP in 2012, according to the IMF. That's higher than any country in the eurozone and nearly three times their magic 3% limit.

What is more, the IMF reckons that nearly seven percentage points of that US borrowing is structural - it won't go away with economic growth. That is a larger structural budget hole than any of the troubled eurozone economies, including Portugal and Greece.

Portugal's structural hole is just over 3% of GDP - half the size of America's. Encouraged by its eurozone partners, it is now planning budget cuts worth even more than that, in 2013 alone. The Greek programme that was debated last night by eurozone ministers involves spending cuts and tax rises worth 7% of GDP in 2013-14, the majority in the first year.

This will be the third year of steep budget cuts for most of these countries, yet policy makers in Brussels, Frankfurt and Berlin think it the bare minimum to maintain market confidence. Why, say the critics, do the same officials think it would be such a disaster for the world economy if America finally started to do the same in 2013?

One answer that economists might give is that European policy makers are conflicted on the subject of fiscal austerity and growth.

Remember those new estimates from the IMF of the "fiscal multiplier" - the amount that a given amount of budget cuts can be expected to cut growth?

Neither the European Commission nor the IMF itself has incorporated these new, higher estimates in its forecasts for Spain and the rest. That suggests that these economies will do even worse in 2013 than the commission or the IMF expects. Remember the Fund overestimated growth in the eurozone this year by a full two percentage points.

For example, the latest forecasts from the commission predict that the Spanish economy will shrink by 1.4% in 2013, but many independent forecasters expect much worse. And the average private forecast for Portugal is that its economy will shrink by 2.3% next year - not 1%, as the commission now expects.

But there's another, more sympathetic explanation why European leaders seem less worried about Europe's fiscal cliff than America's: they just don't see an alternative.

The European Commission, the ECB and the rest think that America can afford to sort out its fiscal problems gradually - but the likes of Portugal and Spain cannot. These countries may be throwing themselves, repeatedly, over a fiscal cliff. But as long as neither eurozone taxpayers nor the global financial markets are willing to finance their current borrowing, the feeling is that austerity and recession are the best they can do.

Is this path really the best of a bad lot? Negotiations over the Greek programme are bogged down on precisely this point.

European officials are resigned to the idea of giving Greece another two years to meet its debt and deficit targets. But neither the Germans nor anyone else seems willing to pay to tide Greece over in the meantime. So the wrangling is set to continue, for at least another few weeks.

In the meantime, you can see why Americans might think it showed some nerve on the part of the Europeans. In effect, Europe's politicians are telling the US government that it needs to keep borrowing to support global growth - even though, when it comes to their own economies, they are doing the exact opposite.

 
Stephanie Flanders Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 10.

    The Euro is a problem that will not go away until a 2 tier europe - Germany and the northern regions in Tier 1, and Spain, Italy, Greece etc in Tier 2, has been set up.

    The UK should opt out of Europe completely - we should trade with the rest of the world and emerging markets and forget the old order within Europe. We won the war but Germany is still determined to take over Europe!

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 9.

    @5 Pete
    More than that, ask the Norwegians to join in too and get them both to teach us how to do it their way.

    Norway had the help of oil & gas without the old industrial hangovers that we had. Not everything is perfect in governmental, economic & fiscal terms in Switzerland but they have got it right most of the time for 50 years & have done better than almost everyone else.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 8.

    So it is a form of financial nimbyism. Look forward to the IMF discovering they have underestimated even the latest multiplier effect. Deflation produces reactive impedance even in the public sector alone & not just how the public sector affects the private sector. In purely accounting terms cutting public sector jobs reduces immediately tax and increase benefits then this has a multiplier effect

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 7.

    Europe's problems are made much worse by the unwillingness to let the Banks pay the true cost for lending money to shaky debtors and by the unsuitability of the single currency for such a diverse mix of economies

    A quick exit from the Euro, default and devaluation would solve the PIIGS' short-term problems in about 3 years, just like it did for Iceland. Cultural factors will take longer to solve

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    It is a mess..

    EU must make a final decision about Greece. This cant go on anymore. This is much more damaging than probably the two options of confirming they are staying or going.

    Do not worry about USA. They have fantastic industry, not much debt as UK and soon they will be energy efficient.

    UK on the other hand, we are a basket case. This is a problem when US and EU sort their mess.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 5.

    The US is responsible for fixing its own problems, and is trying to do just that. The Eurozone on the other hand is just dithering and arguing and getting nowhere - not good for any of the countries involved. Perhaps getting a third party (The Swiss) involved to mediate and regulate a resolution is the answer: http://www.ipinglobal.com/ipin-live/406465/how-to-solve-the-eurozone-crisis

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 4.

    No matter how much they change accounting, raise taxes or cut services. As far as population gets old the system we used in the 70's will not work.

    What would a 12 year old Greek or British think of the deficit if they could vote? Why would they pay so much taxes to pay for other's debt? This is not democracy, this is an elderly majority bullying and stealing from non voting youngsters.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 3.

    A Greek default is inevitable, it is merely being deferred. Grexit will follow, but not necessarily immediately.
    The options for dealing with the internal trade imbalances of the Eurozone are (1) rebalance, (2) can kicking, (3) hiding them (political union) or (4) break up. Option (1) is very unlikely, (2) cannot continue forever, (3) takes a long time and (4) is what I expect to happen.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 2.

    the USA bungie will pull hard very soon, USA policy has been about one man OBAMA's job being secure it will take the next 25 years to recover from this in the USA. Its about not making the hard choices on his watch leaving it to the next president, if it can last that long.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 1.

    Have already posted to this effect on NR's Blog in the absence of anything here.

    The search is on around the western part of the northern hemisphere for sources of taxation. Governments are addicted to spending & making life difficult & expensive for businesses & individuals.

    It has got to be paid for somehow.

 

Page 5 of 5

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.