Child benefit - so you have got a letter

Child benefit letter The child benefit letters have now been sent out by HMRC to about one million people

Related Stories

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is sending letters to about a million people that start with the question: "Are you affected by changes to child benefit?"

The letters are brief, though they do come with a help sheet, and will no doubt raise a lot of questions in recipients' minds.

What follows will, hopefully, answer most of those questions.

What is it all about?

The government has decided to withdraw child benefit (CB) from high-income households.

However, rather than actually cancel the payments, it is imposing a tax charge to claw back some or all of the benefit received.

This new High Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC) starts from 7 January 2013.

An HMRC tool can help most combinations of households decide if they are caught by the new charge.

Income above £50,000 means paying a charge of 1% of the CB for every £100 of income above that £50,000 base level.

So if your income is £57,000 your tax charge equals 70% of the CB received.

Those with income of £60,000 or more will face a tax charge equal to the whole of their household's CB.

I have got a letter - what do I have to do?

First, in the immortal words of Corporal Jones, "don't panic".

The letter is not a tax demand, nor does it require an immediate response.

But those who get one of the letters (and, indeed, some who do not) need to think about their situation and may need to take action before 7 January 2013.

Do bear in mind that the worst that can happen is that the tax bill claws back all of your CB. It can never exceed the CB received.

Who is getting a letter?

HMRC is sending letters to people it thinks:

  • have income over £50,000 (or have a partner who does); and
  • receive child benefit (or have a partner who does)

If this really is not your situation - you do not get CB, or you and your partner each have income below £50,000, then you can ignore the letter.

There is one small group of people who may not be caught by the HMRC's mail-shot but could be liable for tax.

Suppose you are a parent, a single mother for instance, and you give some of your child benefit to the child's grandparents because they look after your child while you go out to work?

If one of the grandparents happens to earn more than £50,000 a year, then the fact that they are receiving some of your child benefit will trigger a tax bill for them.

Map of UK showing number of letters detailing changes sent to high income households by constituency. Figures are to end November 2012 and are provided by the Treasury. Some estimates suggest that letters have been sent to two thirds of affected households.

What counts as income?

Income here is "adjusted net income" - all taxable income for the tax year in question. The "net" is because pension contributions and payments to charities can be deducted.

Income includes salary, taxable benefits-in-kind such as a company car, net-rental income, and gross-interest income.

There is a calculator on the new website to help you.

Child benefit facts

  • Child benefit is a tax-free payment that is aimed at helping parents cope with the cost of bringing up children
  • One parent can claim £20.30 a week for an eldest or only child and £13.40 a week for each of their other children
  • The payments apply to all children aged under 16 and in some cases until they are 20 years old
  • The system is administered by HM Revenue and Customs, which pays out to nearly 7.9 million families, with 13.7 million children

Who counts as a partner?

This includes a husband, wife or civil partner unless you are separated in a way that is expected to be permanent.

However, the term also includes someone with whom you are living as if they are your husband, wife or civil partner - which, inevitably, is going to cause some uncertainties.

The point is that the HICBC attaches to the higher earner of the couple.

So for many married couples caught by the HICBC, that will mean the wife receiving CB, but the husband receiving a tax bill to claw back some or all of the CB.

It will undoubtedly be the case that, for some people, their positions will change during a year.

The amount of the HICBC is calculated by reference to the period the couple were together.

I think I am liable - what are my choices?

As HMRC's letter says, you can choose whether to:

  • stop receiving CB and avoid the charge, or
  • keep getting CB and declare the payments for income tax purposes

This is really something that partners need to decide jointly.

Those who believe they are definitely going to lose all their CB may decide to stop getting the CB in the first place.

The person receiving CB needs to fill in the online form at or call the CB helpline on 0845 302 1444.

Those who are not sure what their income will be, or who think their income will be in the £50-60,000 bracket, or of course those whose income is below the threshold, will probably decide to keep receiving CB.

It makes sense to monitor the position during the year and consider putting a bit of money aside if there is going to be a charge.

Baby being fed Child benefit amounts to £20.30 a week for an eldest or only child

Do I have to tell HMRC I might be liable for HICBC?

Yes. If you do not normally fill in a self-assessment tax return, you will need to tell HMRC by completing form SA1 - see - by 6 October after the end of the tax year.

How do I pay HICBC?

In principle HICBC will be due for payment at the same time as self-assessment liabilities.

So, the first charges, for CB for the three months 7 January - 5 April 2013, will be due for payment by 31 January 2014.

If you do not want to pay the HICBC in a lump sum, you can choose to pay the charge through PAYE codes.

So the underpayment for 2012-13, and your ongoing in-year liability, could be collected through your tax code in 2014-15.

What if I make the wrong choice?

There is no penalty for keeping receiving CB if you (or your partner) have a high income.

You just need to tell HMRC so they can levy the HICBC. And you can stop the CB payments at any time.

More importantly, some people will stop the payments and then find their income does not reach the £60,000 level after all, or they split up with a partner who had the high income.

In this case they can reinstate the CB payments.

Such reinstatement can be made retrospective for up to two years.

Bear in mind that if your income was the lower one but still over £50,000, you will have to pay a tax charge too.

My partner and I do not talk about finances. How do I find out our position?

How it might work

  • Janet, a single mother, has one child and accordingly has CB of £1,040 for the tax year.
  • Her income is £52,000.
  • Half way through the year she moves in with John, who has income of £65,000.
  • For half the year, Janet is liable to HICBC.
  • With income £2,000 (20%) above the base level, she faces a tax charge of 20% of the CB for the six months she is on her own: £104.
  • For the second half of the year, John is liable to the HICBC and he will face a full claw-back charge of £520.

It will be possible to get some information from HMRC.

It will be able to say if your partner gets CB; also, based on the information it holds, whether your partner's income is higher than yours.

I did not get a letter - am I still potentially liable for HICBC?

Yes. The same principles apply as set out above.

HMRC cannot guarantee to contact all affected people, particularly where relationships are changing.

It has a lot of useful information at

It also offers a helpline on 0845 302 1444.

The opinions expressed are those of the author and are not held by the BBC unless specifically stated. The material is for general information only and does not constitute investment, tax, legal or other form of advice. You should not rely on this information to make (or refrain from making) any decisions. Links to external sites are for information only and do not constitute endorsement. Always obtain independent professional advice for your own particular situation.


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 112.

    C2DE: I am 24 years into my career in engineering, I am degree qualified and am continuously working 50hour weeks in my mid 40's, I worked this hard so my wife could stay at home to bring up our children. I feel priveleged that I can earn a good wage, but not lucky. On minimum wage you should be able to earn about 12.5K full time, it's not great but would be a significant uplift, good luck.

  • rate this

    Comment number 111.

    "I'd suggest £50k doesn't go that far - depending on where you live e.g. London"

    It's all relative. £50k can go quite far, even in London, but it is probable that the family on £50k is going to be paying more rent and will have more outgoings than a family on a lower income.

    I'm in favour of making CB a means tested benefit, but it's unfair to suggest those on £50k won't 'feel the pinch'.

  • rate this

    Comment number 110.

    Interestingly, Osborne claims that about 85% of people support this change, about the same percentage of people that are not effected by it. It's an attack on a stay-at-home Mum or Dad family unit for all but the really highest of earners, ooooh who Osborne has just give a tax cut too. I will NEVER vote Tory again.

  • rate this

    Comment number 109.

    Lucky to earn 50k + YES as lucky as the 98k ers NO !
    I earn less than 8.4k a year brought up to around 12k with benefits. If I went to work full time where I am now I could earn up to 10.5K a year but would pay out £30+ a day child care so would probably lose money going full time !

  • rate this

    Comment number 108.

    C2DE: A couple on £98K can claim full benefit, a single earner on £60000 loses all, work out relative household incomes and come back if you think the 50K earner is still "lucky". It''s half baked, if it were properly means tested I would not like it, but I could accept it, in it's current form it s cheap shot that they hope won't loose too many votes.

  • rate this

    Comment number 107.

    My salary is £65k so I know we will not get the allowance and I accept that. I don't accept a couple whos join income is above £65k, but individual less the £50k still receive it. Their net income is higher then mine to start with when you take into account income tax, NI etc. That is unfair.

  • rate this

    Comment number 106.

    103.C2DE, nobody said i can't afford to lose it, though it may be true for some, i just don't agree with the random figure chosen, the idiotic rational, nor the fact i am currently several thousand pounds a year worse off thanks to the labour governments complete mismanagement of the economy.

  • rate this

    Comment number 105.

    But if I was earning 50k a year I would probably be able to spell Goose correctly..

  • rate this

    Comment number 104.

    I agree, how much will this cost to administer, its ridiculous. I am all for a welfare state, one that helps people, not one that makes working a joke, as you can be better off by not working. Man-o-Brick, need to check your facts, everytime the 50% rate is applied, tax revenues go down and vice-versa, incentivise working and creating wealth

  • rate this

    Comment number 103.

    I do not understand any of this.
    There is lots of talk about the unemployed and low wage earners having children they can not afford but take child benefit off people who earn £50,000+ a year and they say "We can not afford it" ! Well what is good for the gouse is good for the gander !
    If I was lucky enough to earn 50k+ I hope I would have the good grace to say I do not need Child Benefit !

  • rate this

    Comment number 102.

    This is a ridiculous waste of money.
    Higher rate earners pay huge amounts in tax, better to consider child benefit as a tiny refund of tax paid and be done with it.

  • rate this

    Comment number 101.

    This country (as any) needs some of us to raise children, and CB is (was) a way to recognise those people who are happy to do so. It is plainly wrong to cut CB, no matter how much those who receive it earn. If the government wants more ££, simply raise the higher tax rate by a bit, or low the threshold for paying it. But ... in the first place, don't cut the 50% tax rate for the super-rich!

  • rate this

    Comment number 100.

    Hang on - it used to be a tax allowance for dependents (except they didn't trust dad not to spend it done the pub so they gave it to Mum - CB). Everyone to live which costs - so EVERYONE including children should be entitled to a basic tax free allowance. All these dependent tax allowances should be deductible from the total family income regardless of the number of earners - that would be fair!

  • rate this

    Comment number 99.

    I don't disagree that higher earners should no longer get CB, but not in this unfair manner. And, if we're supposed to be all in it together, why are people with children being targeted disproportionately? The best way of ensuring everyone contributes is a small tax-rise for all. Anything else is unfair.

  • rate this

    Comment number 98.

    JPublic, I think you're wrong. Until the 1970s child benefit or family allowance was only payable for the second child and any subsequent children. It was only in the mid-70s that first time mothers became eligible to claim.

  • rate this

    Comment number 97.

    As outlined the changes seem fair, but CB should not be payable on children 3 to infinity in any event.

    Some of the contributors below seem to be on eye watering salaries and still protest!

  • rate this

    Comment number 96.

    My grievance is the inequality of the changes. No 'affluent' families should get CB. As a 1-earner house where my partner earns just over £60k, we are affluent. We'll no longer get any CB. This is annoying but fair. It's not fair that 2 earner homes earning up to £50k each (up to £100k in total) will still receive full CB. Taxpayers shouldn't fund these 'affluent' families. It's plain wrong.

  • rate this

    Comment number 95.

    I haven't got any kids and I don't benefit from this at all-if you can't afford them , don't have them.

  • rate this

    Comment number 94.

    Surely if this tax is going be "fair" then it should be based on the total income of the household and not just on the highest single earner? If both parents earn £49,999 then they have a house hold income of £99,998 but as neither earn over the £50,000 threshold they do not have to pay the tax. Whereas, a couple with a single income of £60,000 will lose the benefit completely.How is this fair

  • rate this

    Comment number 93.

    89, J Public, thanks for the patronising comment, we do not live beyond our means, thanks for asking. We have a household income of £150k, but that isn't the point, we have no debts, just pointing out the arbitary figure of £50k is wrong. Depends hugely on where you live, as to how much your mortgage has to be.


Page 1 of 6


More Business stories


Business Live

    12:13: Market update

    After earlier gains, the FTSE 100 share index in London fell 6.39 points to 6,934.25. In Frankfurt, the Dax has followed the same pattern, down 7.4 points to 11,402.9. The Cac in Paris slipped just under 3 points to 4,914.4.

    • Barclays dips 3.3% after unveiling more provisions for PPI and rate-fixing investigations
    • Tullow Oil bounced back 4% after falling 7.7% yesterday on concerns that a boundary dispute between Ivory Coast and Ghana could delay a project off west Africa
    PPI Via Email Kevin Peachey Personal finance reporter, BBC News

    Barclays today became the latest bank to add to the amount of money set aside for PPI mis-selling cases. The total bill for the top five banks in the UK is now an eye-watering £24.4bn, says consumer group Which?.

    Fiat-Chrysler Via Email Russell Hotten Business reporter, BBC News
    Sergio Marchionne

    Fiat-Chrysler's boss thinks it is great that Google and Apple are moving into car technology - but it also makes him feel uncomfortable. Sergio Marchionne (pictured here with a Ferrari) said at the Geneva motor show that the industry needs "disruptive interlopers. It's a good thing. But when you're the guy whose life is being disrupted, it's not necessarily a good feeling."

    11:29: Australian rates

    The Reserve Bank of Australia left interest rates unchanged at 2.25% today after cutting by a quarter of a point in January for the first time in 18 months. Further easing remains on the cards to help drive down the Aussie dollar and drive growth. Greg Gibbs, an RBS analyst, said "unusually clear guidance" meant the RBA is keen to keep a lid on the dollar.

    Geneva motor show Via Email Russell Hotten Business reporter

    Aston Martin unveils plans to broaden its range of cars to attract younger and female buyers. New sports cars, a four-seater - and a small SUV - are all in the pipeline. The British carmaker may be synonymous with James Bond, but its buyers are frequently middle-aged enthusiasts. "The brand has to be relevant," says boss Andy Palmer. "Less dependent on a narrow portfolio and one type of customer."

    11:01: Treasury Committee

    Mr Habgood says he never thought that the terms of reference for Lord Grabiner's inquiry were restrictive. Mr Carney agrees that the barrister was able to investigate freely and had unlimited resources to do so.

    10:49: Treasury Committee

    The Bank's internal investigation, led by barrister Lord Grabiner, began in March 2014 following allegations that a senior member of staff had been told of "attempts to move" the foreign exchange market. It resulted in the Bank's chief foreign currency exchange dealer, Martin Mallett, being dismissed in November. Mr Carney told MPs that Mr Mallett was aware of possible misconduct into the forex market but failed to share that information with his superiors: "He did not escalate these issues."

    10:43: M&A statistics

    The Office for National Statistics says the number of mergers and acquisitions involving UK companies fell to the lowest figure since 1987 last year. "The downward trend of domestic M&A may be a result of UK political instability as UK businesses experienced uncertainties about the outcome of the Scottish referendum, held in September 2014, and the impending general election," the ONS said.

    10:27: Treasury Committee

    Bank of England governor Mark Carney and chairman of its court, Anthony Habgood, are giving evidence to MPs on the Treasury committee about the Bank's own foreign exchange market investigation. Labour MP John Mann asks how deeply ingrained the concept of a "nod and a wink culture" is at the Bank. Mr Habgood admits there is a need to professionalise the working practices.

    Via Email Beef ban Simon Atkinson Editor, India Business Report
    Water buffalo

    Bad news for beef farmers - and for those who like a burger. Cows are holy to Hindus - slaughtering the animals was already illegal. But in Maharashtra state, that ban has now been extended to bulls and bullocks. The beef industry here says thousands of jobs in will be lost. Water buffalo (like the pair above) survive though - or rather - don't …. so the beef substitute will still be available.

    09:54: China trade Radio 5 live

    Parcelforce Worldwide's ales and marketing director, Helen Wylde, was on 5 live earlier talking about sales to China from the UK. Baby milk, children's clothing, shoes, toys, educational books from Britain all sell well in China. The most odd? Bicycles. Chinese buyers like trusted brands.

    09:37: Construction data

    The purchasing managers' index for the construction sector rose 1 point to 60.1 in February, defying expectations for a fall as growth picked up across the housing, commercial and civil engineering sectors. Tim Moore, senior economist at Markit, says some construction companies think the general election outcome could prove a "temporary bump in the road" for new work.

    09:21: Paddy Power results
    World Cup

    It's a lucky day for Paddy Power investors after the company said it will return €392m cash to shareholders after failing to find any potential bid targets. Operating profit jumped by a better than expected 19% to €163.8m for 2014, helped by last summer's World Cup, which was won by Germany.

    Barclays results Via Email Chirantan Barua Bernstein Research

    Dividends were held flat for the fourth quarter at 3.5p as compared to last year and came in lower than consensus at 3.7p. Non-progressive nature will be taken as marginally negative and also highlights that the bank's key focus continues to be capital build.

    08:53: Business Matters World Service
    Royal Enfield

    Can India's cities become cleaner and greener? Business Matters on the World Service is live from Chennai all week. In the first programme Fergus Nicoll asks whether the infrastructure is fit for purpose - and visits an Indian success story with its roots in Britain: Royal Enfield motorcycles. Listen here.

    08:41: Barclays
    Barclays shares

    Shares in Barclays are down 2.3%, or 6.15p, at 256.6p in morning trading in London. The stock has not moved much over the past 12 months given that it's just 8.7p higher than the price on March 4 last year.

    08:27: Ford BBC Radio 4
    Ford Mustang

    Jim Farley, Ford's European president, tells presenter Simon Jack on Today that he hopes Britain does not leave the European Union. One in three engines made by the company comes from the UK, which he described as the "centrepiece" of its global enterprise. Asked about the Russian market, Farley said Ford believed in it in the long term but admitted that some short-term adjustments were required because of the volatile economy.

    08:14: Taylor Wimpey results

    If you're a house builder and you're not making piles of money, then something is very wrong. Fortunately for Taylor Wimpey that is not the case. Annual pre-tax profits are up two thirds to £450m before one-off deductions as 12,454 homes were completed across the UK - 758 more than in 2013 - with an 11.5% rise in average selling price to £213,000.

    07:56: Barclays results

    While Mr Jenkins takes his first annual bonus with Barclays, the overall 2014 bonus pool for the bank is down £520m to £1.86bn. Most of the total - £1.05bn - goes to the investment bank. Its capital ratio, a measure of strength against unexpected losses, is up to 10.3% from 9.1%.

    07:44: Barclays results BBC Radio 4

    Barclays chief Antony Jenkins is on Today. The bank is the healthiest it has been since the financial crisis, he says. Changing culture at the bank takes a long time, Mr Jenkins adds, but the "vast majority" of his 130,000 bankers "want to do the right thing". He is taking a bonus of £1.1m after the "huge amount of progress" the bank has made. Asked about the topic du jour, Mr Jenkins says he pays all his tax in the UK and as a US green card holder.

    07:37: Barclays results

    Barclays wrote down the value of its education, social housing and local authority loan portfolio by £935m. Last year the portfolio was valued at just less than £16bn, but at that time, the lender reclassified the loans as "level 3" assets. That's City-speak for loans you cannot value easily because they don't sell very often.

    07:24: Direct Line results
    Direct Line website

    It's been a good 2014 for Direct Line, with pre-tax profits up 12% to £456.8m and a windfall of £430m from the sale of its international business. Shareholders will pocket total dividends of 27.2p per share, up from 20.6p in 2013. Harvey Keitel probably pocked a pretty penny too for featuring in its TV ads.

    07:16: Barclays results

    Antony Jenkins will take his first bonus as chief executive of the lender: £1.1m. The bank also said it would increase its provision for payment protection insurance (PPI) by £200m for the last three months of 2014, taking the year's total to £1.1bn. Excluding these provisions and other things the bank considers one-offs, pre-tax profit rose 12% to £5.5bn. But including the nasties, the figure sank 21% to £2.26bn.

    07:03: Barclays results

    Barclays have posted their 2014 results. They have set aside an extra £750m after those investigations for foreign exchange manipulation, taking the pot to £1.25bn.

    06:53: Barclays BBC Radio 4

    Chris Wheeler, of Atlantic Equities, has also popped up on Today. He tells Simon Jack that Barclays is doing only "averagely well ... it's still work in progress". He expects pre-tax profits to be about £5.2bn when the bank reports its annual results at 7am.

    06:35: Markets performance Radio 5 live

    Justin Urquhart-Stewart of 7 Investments is still on 5 live. "We are dealing with companies that make a profit and make things," he says of the Nasdaq's rally. The dotcom boom was based on companies that failed to make money, although "we have to be wary" because markets in 2015 are gorged on cheap money and cheap debt.

    06:23: Barclays results Radio 5 live

    Chris Wheeler of Atlantic Equities is talking about Barclays. £5.2bn pretax profits are on the cards for the bank in its annual results, he estimates - a tad ahead of last year's result. However, "it's the return on equity that counts", he says. The bank is struggling to make 10%, which for a high-risk endeavour like banking is not where you want that figure, Wheeler adds. Results come at 07:00.

    06:11: Markets performance Radio 5 live

    Justin Urquhart-Stewart of 7 Investments is on 5 live as the markets guest. "You have a global economy in pretty good shape and in the eurozone some better figures," he says, following soaring US markets. The FTSE 100 may grow further if there's better sentiment from China, he adds.

    06:02: Mobile World Congress Radio 5 live

    Rory Cellan-Jones, technology correspondent, is in Barcelona at the Mobile World Congress. Sony chief executive Kazuo Hirai is "making some tough decisions" and focusing Sony on things like films and games and camera technology: the areas that make money, he tells 5 live. Like many companies, it's finding mobile phones a tricky market.

    06:00: Chris Johnston Business reporter

    Get in touch via email or on twitter @BBCBusiness

    06:00: Howard Mustoe Business reporter

    Good morning! US stocks hit record levels, with both the Dow Jones and the S&P 500 closing at all-time highs and the Nasdaq breaking the 5,000 barrier for the first time in 15 years. Is that going to last? Stay tuned for more.



  • Mukesh SinghNo remorse

    Delhi bus rapist says victim shouldn't have fought back

  • Aimen DeanI spied

    The founder member of al-Qaeda who worked for MI6

  • Before and after shotsPerfect body

    Just how reliable are 'before and after' photos?

  • A man shutting his eyes tightlyStrange light show

    What do you see when you close your eyes?

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.