Boaden and Mitchell to stand aside

 
Broadcasting House

Helen Boaden and Steve Mitchell have been asked to surrender all their responsibilities as head and deputy head of BBC News, pending the results of the Pollard inquiry, I have learned.

The new acting director general of the BBC, Tim Davie, and the chairman of the BBC Trust, Lord Patten, have concluded that BBC News needs a new clear line of management control.

They have asked Fran Unsworth, head of Newsgathering, and Ceri Thomas, editor of the Today Programme to fill their respective roles, for the time being.

Mr Davie and Lord Patten are understood to believe that Ms Boaden's and Mr Mitchell's decision to withdraw from all decision-making on the way the BBC reports the Jimmy Savile scandal has created confusion at BBC News about who is in charge.

There is likely to be widespread anger within BBC News at what will be seen as a pre-empting of the results of Nick Pollard's investigation into why Newsnight abandoned an investigation into Jimmy Savile's paedophile activities last December.

The decision to ask Ms Boaden and Mr Mitchell to stand aside will be rooted in the results of this weekend's investigation into a later journalistic mistake by Newsnight, its broadcast 10 days ago of allegations that a senior Tory was involved in child abuse.

However, neither Ms Boaden or Mr Mitchell were in the decision-making chain that led to Newsnight's broadcast.

Newsnight

As I understand it, the senior editorial figure who signed off the broadcast, Adrian Van Klaveren, will today return to his job as controller of BBC Radio 5 Live.

Over the weekend, I consulted colleagues on what they thought ought to be the consequence of the latest debacle at Newsnight.

Many said they believed Ms Boaden and Mr Mitchell ought to be put firmly back in charge of news, because of the perception that they would never have permitted the latest child abuse story to have run on Newsnight.

As for what the Pollard review may conclude about the conduct of Ms Boaden and Mr Mitchell, I understand that Peter Rippon - the suspended editor of Newsnight - does not believe he was put under pressure by either Ms Boaden or Mr Mitchell to pull the Savile investigation.

Any criticism of them is therefore likely to be for the long delay in correcting a blog by Mr Rippon about Newsnight's failure to run the Savile film.

My understanding is that Mr Davie believes it is unfair to ask Ms Boaden and Mr Mitchell to continue in their day jobs with the shadow of the Pollard inquiry hanging over them.

He believes that George Entwistle's effectiveness as Director General was undermined by the fact he too was being probed by Mr Pollard. Mr Entwistle resigned on Saturday.

I have learned that lawyers acting for Ms Boaden and Mr Mitchell have informed Mr Davie that they are quite capable of running BBC News, even with the uncertainty created by the Pollard inquiry.

 
Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Has government hurt education exports?

Higher education is a big British export success, but are government policies stunting its growth?

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -14

    Comment number 79.

    When asking the question 'can the BBC survive this crisis?',really it's the wrong question. The question is 'do we need the BBC any more?' Obviously 'no' with the explosion in media availability it's far past its sell by date. The problem has really been created by that fact & an organisation desperatly trying to justify a role for itself, when really there isn't any longer one.

  • rate this
    -12

    Comment number 132.

    BBC should be severely downsized to the point where its only function is to report news. No sports, no music, no editorializing, no commentaries, no anything except report the facts without bias, without opinion. That is what it once knew how to do and do well. Not only is it a failure at everything else, it's primary function has been compromised.All things to all peole became nothing to anyone

  • rate this
    -11

    Comment number 88.

    The solution is to sell off the BBC. This would raise much needed public funds, & as a private organisation would pay tax too. People can carry on watching it through a subscription as with any other media. Could do a deal with the Guardian, buy one get one free, as they are so close editorially& maximise their impact in the champagne-socialist-North-London segment who think they are so wonderful.

  • rate this
    -7

    Comment number 73.

    There should be a full scale public inquiry, the same as Leveson, but even if there isn't I think it's too late. The public can now see the BBC for what it is and will make up their own mind. Avoiding a public enquiry into the operation and management of the BBC will only make it worse.

  • rate this
    -6

    Comment number 95.

    '74.M_T_Wallet-Let's bring to boot the real baddies-NI & the Daily Heil'

    Oh, that is called freedom & democracy- within the confines of the law people are free to write, watch & buy the media they want. You are not forced, unlike with the BBC TV tax to pay for NI or the DM! I know the left aren't keen on freedom of expression - the truth is what they say it is. You know. Like on Newsnight.

 

Comments 5 of 299

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.