Will BP be bruised by Russian bear?

 
BP logo

As I understand it, the reason there has been a delay in the announcement of BP's sale of its half share in TNK-BP to Rosneft is that the deal is significant enough to require the formal approval of Vladimir Putin.

Which is expected from the president of Russia in the course of today, probably this morning. But oil executives are incredibly superstitious about taking any future event in Russia for granted.

As and when it happens (probably later this morning) this will be more than just a sale. It represents the establishment of a new partnership between BP and Russia's biggest energy company, with - as I mentioned last week - BP acquiring a stake in Rosneft of just under 20% (a big chunk of the sale price, of around $27bn, will be in the form of Rosneft shares).

The transaction should be seen in the context of Rosneft's gradual privatisation and its ambition to be seen as one of the world's most powerful oil companies. In that context, Rosneft wants access to BP's engineering skills, its technology, its financial controls, its management expertise and - perhaps most important as it seeks to raise capital from international investors - its approach to governance.

In spite of all the mud hurled at BP during and since the Macondo oil-spill debacle in the Gulf of Mexico, BP would still be seen by shareholders as a model of transparency and communication compared with most Russian companies - and Rosneft apparently wants a bit of that to rub off on it.

For BP, the rewards - if all goes roughly to plan (ahem) - would be opportunities with Rosneft to tap into Russia's vast energy reserves and the probability that the Rosneft stake will become more valuable as this vast lumbering company becomes more efficient and more highly rated by the global investment community.

On this view of what the deal is all about, BP executives are bound to be invited on to Rosneft's board and executive committees. For me therefore a test of the seriousness and depth of the partnership between the companies will be the precise number of BP people who become Rosneft directors and the structures put in place for sharing knowledge and skills.

All that said, some BP shareholders regard the board as bonkers to be even contemplating hugging this great Russian bear, having been pretty bruised in recent years by skirmishes with BP's current Russian partners, the AAR collective of billionaires who jointly own TNK-BP.

But BP's board believes it was unrealistic to contemplate getting nothing but cash for its enormous Russian asset in any sale; and if BP has to have some kind of stake in Rosneft, it is better to have a bigger stake that confers more influence and (perhaps) the opportunity to account for some of Rosneft's reserves and production in its own reserves and production.

BP is doing a deeply unfashionable thing by sticking with Russia at this juncture. But the smartest investors would probably say that the big rewards come from investing when the world is shouting at you to take the money and run.

 
Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Farewell to the mother of all depressions

What kind of economic recovery has the UK been enjoying, and can it last?

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -6

    Comment number 13.

    Who cares if BP is bitten? Do they actually give a damn about the average British person whose family members prevented Germans from taking over the UK while the UK now drowns in immigrants and financially goes into a tailspin? Seriously; how much do BP actually do for Britain rather than themselves?

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 14.

    The safe states with oil either have dwindling reserves, take a large cut or have a state monopoly.

    The not so safe ones, might just decide tomorrow that they want 90% of the proceedings or nationalize the company/wells.

    Meanwhile, post-Empire, post-Financial crash and with the UK's servilism towards the US, being a British oil major doesn't impress any states.

    Though world out there!

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 1.

    Madness. BP might as well take that 27bn quid and put a match to it. No western oilco has got out of Russia with any money yet.

    They'll take the investment, they'll take the expertise and then they'll leave 'em twisting in the breeze.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 9.

    We could call it a "casino investment".

    Now where have I heard that phrase before...???

    Perhaps "circus investment" might be better, where BP get to put their head in a bears mouth.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 2.

    Its a reckless gamble. Since communist times, ie 1918, Russia has shown that they are totally untrustworthy when it comes to business. As in war, they will suck you in and blow you out when it suits them!

 

Comments 5 of 75

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.