George Osborne chooses his words carefully

 
George Osborne George Osborne gave only the broadest sense of the tough decisions he will take over coming months

There was some politics in George Osborne's speech on Monday - as you would expect, at a party conference. But no policy fireworks. And he gave only the broadest sense of the tough decisions he would be taking in the months ahead. That's probably not surprising either.

The difficult reality for Mr Osborne is that the coalition has been struggling to deliver on the two goals that were right at the centre of its economic strategy: growth and deficit reduction. Put simply: the lack of one has made the second a lot more difficult.

As I have previously described in detail, these problems are going to come to a head in the next few weeks, because the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is likely to have some bad news for him.

If the independent forecasters are right, the OBR is almost certain to tell him that he will not be able to meet his debt target - that is, to have the stock of debt falling as a share of GDP in 2015 - without additional tax rises or spending cuts, before the election.

If the FT's economics editor, Chris Giles, is right, the OBR is also likely to tell him (again) that the structural hole in the public finances is larger than previously thought, meaning even more austerity is required, well into the next parliament.

Last year, Mr Osborne decided to put off additional measures to fix the deficit until after the Budget. The betting in Westminster is that he will do the same again in December's Autumn Statement. But this time, that is likely to have the extra consequence of forcing him to abandon, or suspend, his debt rule for 2015.

Were there any clues to that in Monday's speech? The simple answer is no. In fact, he did not mention either of his two key fiscal targets in his speech.

To be fair, he didn't mention them in last year's party conference speech either. It's not that kind of moment.

No 'growth'

But what about the coalition's core objectives: economic growth and the "deficit reduction plan"? They have each played a prominent part in previous speeches by Chancellor Osborne.

You might be surprised to hear that he didn't directly mention either of these terms on Monday. As many of the Twitterati have noted, he didn't use the word "growth" at all.

Some will say he didn't mention them because he cannot be sure of achieving either growth or deficit reduction in 2012. The economy will probably be smaller at the end of the year than it was at the start, while the government's deficit so far in 2012-13 has been running about 20% higher.

Or, perhaps, we're all reading too much into his choice of words. Either way, the next few weeks are unlikely to be a fun time to be chancellor.

 
Stephanie Flanders Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 324.

    The cat has the cream.

    He's licking his lips.

    What else do we expect from this shower?

    Loads of money spent on the Olympics.
    No wonder this shower is full of feel good factor.

    No riot this year either.

    One could be excused for believing they know what they are doing.

    But they don't.

    All they are doing is making their friends happy.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 323.

    Dear Ms Flanders,

    It is rather disconcerting that nobody appears to be concerned that the policies being pursued in eurozone are remarkably similar to those pursued in the 1930's which lead to the rise of extreme nationalism in a number of european states. We already have Golden Dawn and similar groups in Italy and Spain as well as Holland and France.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 322.

    re. Growth

    Real growth is information gain, i.e. reduction in entropy. Technology is one form of this. In the late 20th century genetics changed from a descriptive science to a quantitative one, discovering long term growth over a period of 4 billion years. Growth happens by genetics, neurology, language, technology, etc. In an economy, information is created by micro-economic search.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 321.

    Emphasis on growth or deficit is more of the same old failed paradigm. What's needed is employment growth even if without economic growth. More people working will reduce the income disparity of the past decade. This coalition is heading in the right direction. And it is people employed as % of population of working age please; not unreliable unemployment %.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 320.

    Allowing the banks to put money into risky assets caused the crash. The risky assets were people who were encouraged to use credit cards to buy things they couldn't really afford. The banks issued the credit cards, the banks caused the whole crash.

    It had nothing to do with "the country" spending more than they could afford.

    The banks need to pay. Threats about "leaving the country" be damned!

 

Comments 5 of 324

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.