Electric cars 'pose environmental threat'
Electric car production creates much carbon emissions as well as toxic pollution
Electric cars might pollute much more than petrol or diesel-powered cars, according to new research.
The Norwegian University of Science and Technology study found greenhouse gas emissions rose dramatically if coal was used to produce the electricity.
Electric car factories also emitted more toxic waste than conventional car factories, their report in the Journal of Industrial Ecology said.
However, in some cases electric cars still made sense, the researchers said.
Big impactThe team looked at the life-cycle impact of conventional and electric vehicles.
In essence, they considered how the production, the use and the end-of-life dismantling of a car affects the environment, explained co-author Prof Anders Hammer Stromman.
"The production phase of electric vehicles proved substantially more environmentally intensive," the report said, comparing it to how petrol and diesel cars are made.
"The global warming potential from electric vehicle production is about twice that of conventional vehicles."
In addition, producing batteries and electric motors requires a lot of toxic minerals such as nickel, copper and aluminium.
Hence, the acidification impact is much greater than that of conventional car production.
"Across the other impacts considered in the analysis including potential for effects related to acid rain, airborne particulate matter, smog, human toxicity, ecosystem toxicity and depletion of fossil fuel and mineral resources, electric vehicles consistently perform worse or on par with modern internal combustion engine vehicles, despite virtually zero direct emissions during operation," according to Prof Stromman.
'Counterproductive' efforts“Start Quote
End Quote Dieter Zetsche Chief executive, DaimlerA battery electric vehicle, with electricity produced by the power generation mix we currently have in Europe, compares favourably in the magnitude of 10% or so with diesel”
With electric car production being so damaging to the environment, these cars have already polluted a great deal by the time they hit the road, the report says.
However, if the cars were then powered by electricity made from low-carbon electricity sources, they could nevertheless offer "the potential for substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and exposure to tailpipe emissions" over time.
However, in regions where fossil fuels are the main sources of power, electric cars offer no benefits and may even cause more harm, the report said.
"It is counterproductive to promote electric vehicles in regions where electricity is primarily produced from lignite, coal or even heavy oil combustion."
European benefitsIn Europe, where electricity is produced in a number of different ways, electric cars do offer environmental benefits when compared with cars with internal combustion engines, according to the study.
"Electric vehicles powered by the present European electricity mix offer a 10% to 24% decrease in their global warming potential relative to conventional diesel or petrol vehicles."
This is in line with calculations made by some carmakers.
Cars powered by electricity produced in coal power stations pollute more than petrol or diesel cars
"According to our results, a battery electric vehicle, with electricity produced by the power generation mix we currently have in Europe, compares favourably in the magnitude of 10% or so with diesel," Daimler's chief executive Dieter Zetsche told the BBC.
Longer livesThe report pointed out that the longer an electric car in Europe stays mobile, the greater its "lead" over petrol and diesel engines.
"Assuming a vehicle lifetime of 200,000km exaggerates the global warming benefits of electric vehicles to 27-29% relative to petrol and 17-20% relative to diesel," it said.
"An assumption of 100,000km decreases the benefit of electric vehicles to 9-14% with respect to petrol vehicles and results in impacts indistinguishable from those of a diesel vehicle."
An electric car's longevity depends a great deal on how long its battery lasts, not least since it is very expensive to replace them.
Batteries are gradually getting better, which could result in electric cars being used for longer.
However, as petrol and diesel engines are also improving, the relationships between the different types of vehicles are not constant.
"A more significant reduction in global warming could potentially be achieved by increasing fuel efficiency or shifting from petrol to diesel," the report said.
"If you are considering purchasing an electric vehicle for its environmental benefits, first check your electricity source and second look closely at the warranty on the batteries," said Professor Stromman.
Those in power, meanwhile, should recognise "the many potential advantages of electric vehicles [which] should serve as a motivation for cleaning up regional electricity mixes".
~RS~q~RS~postId=113910444~RS~z~RS~40~RS~)

Jaguar plans hundreds more UK jobs
Germany reports sluggish growth
Hezbollah promises Syria 'victory'
Striking a chord
Life span
Tweets of the week
Radical errors
Working Lives Ecuador
Click
Comment number 28.
MemoryisRAM5th October 2012 - 9:57
Old news, it's just been brushed under the carpert for years.....
I maintain that the best way to help the environment and conserve resources, is to keep the car you have for longer. Cars used to last 15-20 years, these days most people change them every 2 years and they start falling apart before 5 years. They're designed to fall apart, even in warranty.
Link to this (Comment number 28)
Comment number 27.
Bauer5th October 2012 - 9:57
Doesn't matter either way. Electric cars aren't good enough for the vast majority of us yet and nor will they be until they can run several hundred miles off a charge and then not need 8 hours to recharge.
I feel the future does not contain electric cars
Link to this (Comment number 27)
Comment number 26.
nutgone5th October 2012 - 9:56
I was wondering when people would twig that much of this "green" energy is actually made in a polluting power station.
Link to this (Comment number 26)
Comment number 25.
MadbritComment number 25 is an Editors' Pick
5th October 2012 - 9:56
I'm not in the least surprised at these findings as I've questioned the "green" aspect of producing electric vehicles for years, especially with regard to their batteries.
I doubt many will reach 100,000km in their lifetime either, as their main use will inevitably be for short journeys.
Link to this (Comment number 25)
Comment number 24.
Steve5th October 2012 - 9:56
Agree!
Electric cars are unlikely to make us independent from the big energy supplier
Electricity currently comes from coal or atomic power stations (big suppliers, CO2 emissions, dangerous).
Use cooking oil that is grown sustainably. Makes us independent from the big oil industry, moves jobs to poorer countries.
Link to this (Comment number 24)
Comment number 23.
Hornsofthebull5th October 2012 - 9:56
According to wikipedia 57% of economic exports from Norway are Crude oil and Gas. No vested interested there then...
Link to this (Comment number 23)
Comment number 22.
Elly5th October 2012 - 9:55
Someone has finally realised that, unless the electricity is from a 'green' source, anything running on electricity may not be as green as believed!
Link to this (Comment number 22)
Comment number 21.
Dominic5th October 2012 - 9:55
We knew this. How did you imagine we thought electricity was generated?However, taking the long term view, if we can crack nuclear fusion, hence producing produce cheap, clean electricity, then electric cars make a lot of sense.
Link to this (Comment number 21)
Comment number 20.
landscape5th October 2012 - 9:55
For electric car read betamax video. They're less green than ordinary cars partly because of manufacturing process's which have a large carbon footprint, then look at batteries. If you're lucky, will last 7 years and cost thousands to replace. Then of course the electricity still needs to be produced for them so fueling them still has a large 'footprint'.
Invest in hydrogen, it's the way forward.
Link to this (Comment number 20)
Comment number 19.
Mike McKechnieComment number 19 is an Editors' Pick
5th October 2012 - 9:55
Battery technology is improving all the time and with the advent of the electric car, "green batteries" are bound to be a focus area for research. However politicians also need to look at the wider picture and find ways to reduce the number of car journeys we make each year - for example by making public transport an attractive option (rather than just taxing the motorist out of existence)
Link to this (Comment number 19)
Comment number 18.
Tim5th October 2012 - 9:54
This is not a new argument! However, fossil fuels are becoming a scarce resource. Electricity can be generated from renewable sources where as petrol and diesel cannot (Bio fuel is simply not viable on a large scale). The answer is surely to put more money into renewable electricity production, battery technology and manufacturing to reduce this excess CO2 from electric cars.
Link to this (Comment number 18)
Comment number 17.
Andy5th October 2012 - 9:54
What a pathetic premise for a headline. Presumably, on the same principle, if you run an car on electricity produced by incinerating cute animals and cuddly toys then the emotional damage to children of electric cars is significantly worse than petrol cars?
Link to this (Comment number 17)
Comment number 16.
AndyPandy5th October 2012 - 9:54
Just goes to prove that all of these 'do gooders' really haven't the foggiest. "Up to twice as polluting". Do us all a favour and weigh in your pointless environmentally damaging electric car at the scrap yard and buy a proper fuel efficient car. The people who buy these electric cars are just sheep - no clue.
Link to this (Comment number 16)
Comment number 15.
FasterThanTheAverageYeti5th October 2012 - 9:53
HA! thats what you get for going "green"
Top gear proved hybrids/electric cars are not emissions friendly..its not what you drive, its how you drive. Just hopefully toyota will scrap making Prius'
Link to this (Comment number 15)
Comment number 14.
ClaphamBusman5th October 2012 - 9:53
Pretty much agrees with the "dust-to-dust" lifetime appraisal that was published when the Toyota Prius was first launched.
Surely it is better to retain older vehicles, repairing and upgrading them as necessary, and thereby reduce the impact of the construction of new vehicles and disposal of the old.
Link to this (Comment number 14)
Comment number 13.
do_not_track5th October 2012 - 9:53
The only pollution problem we should be worried about with cars is the localised effects in cities. Electricity certainly helps here. If CO2 bothers you, get behind the nuclear industry or go and live on an island with no resources.
Link to this (Comment number 13)
Comment number 12.
havadram5th October 2012 - 9:52
I would think it is safe to say that anything man-made will pose an enviromental threat.
Link to this (Comment number 12)
Comment number 11.
farkyssComment number 11 is an Editors' Pick
5th October 2012 - 9:52
This was obvious for a long time for anyone with even a modest intellect. The same is true of wind farms.
if you want clean energy, then go for large scale tidal barrages, hydroelecric, and work towards nuclear fusion.
If you want clean cars without batteries, then hydrogen cars with the hydrogen produced using clean electric.
Link to this (Comment number 11)
Comment number 10.
IanS5th October 2012 - 9:51
What a load of utter tosh.
The sensible thing with electric vehicles is to charge using PV.
Coal fired production? Nuclear? Are they mad?
Link to this (Comment number 10)
Comment number 9.
EasyjetMags5th October 2012 - 9:51
Build nuclear power stations to provide a staedy supply of electricty, buy electric cars, re-charge them overnight, use wave wind hydro tidal to supplement and use fossil fuels as slowly as possible - as they'll run out eventually. Also stops having to pay big bucks to arabs - who seem intent on spending it on arms to kill each other
Link to this (Comment number 9)
Page 11 of 12