Libor: The final humiliation for banks

 
city of London The end of self-regulation for the City?

If ever there was a symbol that regulators and government no longer trust banks to do the right thing, it is today's formal announcement that the British Bankers' Association will no longer oversee the setting of Libor.

In the words of Martin Wheatley's review of how this important benchmark of interest rates is set, "the BBA acts as the lobby organisation for the same submitting banks that they nominally oversee, creating a conflict of interest that precludes strong and credible governance".

In other words, there is no longer any nook or cranny in the City of London where self-regulation can be trusted to work.

Which I suppose is not a great surprise, after all those revelations about how bankers at Barclays tried to rig Libor rates to generate unfair profits on deals linked to their respective bonuses - and in advance of similar revelations that will be forthcoming soon about bankers' Libor conduct at other banks, including Royal Bank of Scotland.

In place of the BBA - which, it should be remembered, actually created Libor in 1986 and has administered it throughout its history - there will be a data provider (an organisation such as Bloomberg or Reuters) or a regulated exchange.

This new administrator of Libor will be selected by a committee to be chaired by the former 3i chair Baroness Hogg and which will be set up by the Treasury and the Financial Services Authority.

All that said, some would say it is a bit odd (ahem) that the Financial Services Authority and the Bank of England did not take evasive action to grip the Libor-setting process back in 2008, when problems in the market first became conspicuous. And, as it happens, the BBA asked them for help at the time but was rebuffed.

Or to put it another way, no one - banks, BBA or regulators - emerges with any credit from this mess.

Why does any of this matter? Well the Libor rates are supposed to indicate the cost of borrowing for banks. and they are in turn used for the pricing of financial transactions worth more than $300 trillion (yes, trillion) and even have an impact on the mortgage rates we pay.

So, for confidence that the City of London is doing its job properly, it is important that Libor is set in a fair, robust and reliable way.

Wheatley has two other important reforms, apart from turfing out the BBA.

First, a load of rates that are barely used, in less heavily traded currencies (the Aussie dollar, the NZ dollar, the Canadian dollar, Swedish krona and Danish krona) and in funny maturities will be axed.

Also the interest rates bankers submit to the panels that calculate the benchmarks will be based on actual transactions, rather than the historic practice of a banker sticking his wet finger up in the air and wondering which way the financial wind is blowing.

Second, the whole Libor-setting process will be firmly brought inside the regulatory net, so that the procedures followed by banks in submitting rates for the Libor calculations will be vetted by regulators and attempting to rig the rate will become an unambiguously illegal action.

Some may say that it is weird that such an important cog in the global financial machine was allowed to free-wheel, with no oversight or maintenance by regulators, for so long. But then when we look back on the great faith everyone placed in banks and financial markets before the great crash of 2007-8, so much of what transpired seems to belong to another universe.

 
Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Is the UK becoming more productive?

The Bank of England has become more optimistic that the UK's poor productivity performance may at last be improving - as it signals no urgent need for interest rates to rise.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 212.

    Comrade@209
    No rest for the thinking!

    I was imagining, 'victimless crime', life-style temptation, or worse, practising to deceive, the web so tangles as we weave, working for the team, the GDP, the state, The People: even, terrible thought, that really, Number One might be right!

    Not all can have conscience (1-3%), but might be 'trained to emulate'

    For most, just stop offering 'protection'!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 211.

    209.AfA

    " Fooling others? And selves?"

    Fool me once shame on you. Fool myself twice shame on me!

    If we can fool ourselves, where does that leave "Rule of Conscience"?

    Sometimes outside intervention is the only correction possible.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 210.

    There can be no shame in trying to save a duff bank or a duff company.
    The real shame is down to the people who think it is OK to spend public money trying to save private investors from a very bad investment.
    Bit like,heads they win.Tails we lose.
    Or,put another way,
    People who have nothing,come to the rescue of people who can afford a flutter on the Stock Exchange.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 209.

    ComradeOgilvy @208
    "What we don't know"
    We can guess, not so smart

    Fooling others? And selves?

    Charity I fear may not cover all
    If like 'Charlie' Richardson
    Judge made 'ashamed'
    Living in same country

    We all need rescue, by ourselves
    Agreeing to Rule of Conscience

    For the record: Equal Democracy
    (apologies to those who know)

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 208.

    206.AfA

    Actual transactions stopped when banks no longer trusted one another. Thus Wheatley's assessment that it is repairable is plain wrong and so much therefore remains uncertain.

    His honest assessment - of the market, by the market, for the market - is more than a clue... As this phoenix died under the weight of regulation, a new one will rise.

    What we don't know won't hurt us, eh?

 

Comments 5 of 212

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.