Did a medieval monk predict the double-dip?

 
Paul Mason (left) and musicians Paul (left) as musical director at Loughborough University in a rehearsal for Carousel (1986)

I have always been fascinated by patterns and lines in music - I studied the rise of musical notation, in the form of the "tonic sol-fa" invented by Benedictine monk Guido d'Arezzo in the 10th Century, and the early system of lines and "neumes" (notes) he proposed.

In the beginning, notes on a stave were used to write down and pass on songs that had been rote learned.

But once you get notation, you get theory. And musical theory allowed composers to create tunes and harmonies out of their heads, on paper: to disrupt and play around with tunes instead of simply writing down what flows naturally from the human voice; to create sounds that shocked their audience instead of soothing them.

One of the earliest examples of this is the Kyrie Osbornum, an anonymous manuscript recently found in the archives of an English Cathedral. Written using the Gregorian notation, the piece is remarkable for the way it departs from the "normal" ebb and flow patterns we are used to in Gregorian chant.

The first phrase is a classic, wavering melody, sublime but unremarkable.

The second (on the word Eleison) suddenly dips an entire octave in mid-phrase, stretching the capabilities of the monastic choir to breaking point - only then to soar high above its starting point, giving the whole passage a manic-depressive feel quite unprecedented in the music of the time.

In the final phrase, the voice rises falteringly, only to fall back again - not as deeply, but settling on the "dominant" (sol in Guidonian notation), giving the whole melody the feel of being unfinished.

What has startled musicologists is the similarity of the Kyrie to a graph of the UK's quarterly GDP growth figures since before the Lehman Brothers crisis.

Like the UK economy, the melody starts stable, plunges to unheard of depths, recovers, but falls again at the end. And like the Kyrie, the UK growth graph speaks of disruption, depression, failed recovery, uncertainty.

UK economic performance graph
Music notation

Controversy rages about the Kyrie, with some scholars determined to prove it is a fake, planted perhaps by an economist who is also a musician, and who has simply projected each 0.25% rise or fall in output onto a four-stave graph.

This school of thought has dubbed the piece the Kyrie Darlingianum.

On Tuesday 11 September at 3.00pm on Radio 4, I'll be digging further into the mystery of this remarkable piece in the first of a new series entitled Short Cuts: Tracing the line.

 
Paul Mason, Economics editor, Newsnight Article written by Paul Mason Paul Mason Former economics editor, Newsnight

End of an era

After 12 years on Newsnight, Economics editor Paul Mason has moved on to pastures new and this blog is now closed.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 24.

    An amusing item in the best tradition of English whimsy. Don’t know why some folk have taken against it. Jock McGovern would be pleased to see what you are getting up to these day and that music making covers all manner of human activity.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 23.

    Not sure what you've been smoking Paul, but I'll have some

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 22.

    I'm a teeny weeny bit peeved!! Some confusion over time of broadcast and I've missed it ...

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 21.

    Prudeboy @16
    "No Patterns"?

    Missed Paul's punch-line, but 'something nasty' happened to 'the pattern' of a peaceful chant - someone coughed or choked on an illicit sweet perhaps

    Perhaps 'a pattern' in the monks' response?

    Hands raised, all fall to groaning

    No CPR needed: but what will the papers say?

    All we needed was a Lehman's food bank - we were feeding them anyway - 'til proper jobs found

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 20.

    "Theory of Everything"
    There’s room in higher dimensions to put all forces together, but 4 dimensions is not big enough to accommodate all these. When you expand to 11 dimensions, everything works perfectly.
    I think Paul may be onto something, but I can't keep up. I am not Einstein, but I have always known we are too primitive to see REALITY, far less work with it, which one day we will.

 

Comments 5 of 24

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.