Lloyds shows cost of alienating customers

 
LLoyds TSB

There has been progress at semi-nationalised Lloyds.

Loans are going bad at a slower rate, and are not expected by Lloyds to deteriorate any time soon - which is another one of those benign trends that makes the current UK recession seem slightly odd.

The bank has further reduced its dependence on unreliable wholesale funding.

And although there has been a further fall in the profitability of lending, the so-called margin, that is now expected to stabilise before recovering early next year.

As for when the bank might resume paying a dividend and when the Treasury might start thinking about privatising some of taxpayers' 40% stake, that can all be evaluated in the autumn, after the shape of Europe's new banking rules are clearer (in what's known as CRD4).

Those positive developments have largely been drowned out however by Lloyds' disclosure that it is making a further £700m of provisions to cover the costs of paying compensation to those who were missold PPI credit insurance.

Those additional PPI costs meant Lloyds remained in loss, for the first six months of the year, to the tune of £439m. And they bring to a gargantuan £4.275bn Lloyds' aggregate provisions for recompensing customers who were wrongly sold this loan insurance.

What is perhaps horrifying in these huge numbers is how much time and money Lloyds is deploying on processing bogus claims.

The chief executive Antonio Horta-Osorio told me that Lloyds is employing 6000 people full time on processing claims for PPI compensation, of which 1000 spend all their time dealing with false claims.

Lloyds blames unscrupulous claims management companies (CMCs) for a sharp increase in fictitious claims. It says half of all requests for compensation come from CMCs, and adds that 50% of CMC claims are bogus.

If like me you are someone who never bought PPI insurance and yet receive daily calls and texts from CMCs claiming they have "information" that you are entitled to compensation, you may not be wholly surprised by Lloyds' claim that hundreds of thousands of people apply for compensation without any proper justification.

Mr Horta-Osorio complains that the system incentivises the bank to give money even to those with no decent argument for it, because the moment any case is forwarded to the ombudsman Lloyds incurs an automatic bill of £800.

Understandably Lloyds feels hard done by - and would like the Ministry of Justice, which authorises CMCs, to do something about the cowboys.

There is however a thoroughly painful and depressing lesson for the banks in all this.

All that mis-selling and all that reckless lending in the boom years that hobbled the economy seems to have so undermined the trust and respect of banks' customers that few seem to think twice before putting in a flimsy demand for compensation.

An epidemic of mis-selling may have spawned an epidemic of mis-claiming.

 
Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

This column...

This column may be a bit quiet for a bit, because I am away from the office.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -4

    Comment number 34.

    Dear Robert you do love repeating your mantra about banks and reckless lending. But could it be that the same financial illiterates who are currently claiming PPI compensation when they weren't sold it are the ones who borrowed more than they could repay?
    Banker bashing is fun, but it's a distraction from the real issue - the great British public's greed.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 91.

    81 rememberdurutti

    novel take on reality there - a few facts for you .

    Who was managing the banks when they were lending irresponsibly
    - Brown and Balls

    Who was not
    - Cam & oz

    who forced lloyds into buying hbos , thus destroying them .
    - Brown & Balls

    who did not
    -Cam & Oz

    who ordered an inquirey into banking practice
    -Cam and Oz

    who did nothing at all.
    - Brown and Balls .

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 61.

    I presume every bogus claimant will be the subject of a criminal prosecution for attempted fraud?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 65.

    The true story of this scandal and the injury done to those who believed they were insured, has never yet emerged. That an industry ogbogies is milking the claim process is as regrettable as the scandal itself, which was far broader than simple mis-selling and still is not properly told. The problem was far broader than the mis-selling and is a scandal,s scandal not properly reported.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 72.

    'trends that makes the current UK recession seem slightly odd'
    Wake up Robert.
    What about compensation for all the damage these shysters have done to the WORLDS economies???
    Please watch this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdEh-7NPn-Y

    and don't be fooled into believing that no-one knew.
    By the way, stock up on some essentials if you want to eat next year.

 

Comments 5 of 109

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.