Could Barclays’ review spur break-up of bank?

 
The Barclays Bank headquarters in Canary Wharf in east London Might Barclays' retail and investment arms be separated?

Is it possible that Barclays' board has been misled by Anthony Salz's urbane manner and establishment background into thinking that his review of the bank's business practices will deliver an answer to them which is comforting and anodyne?

I have known the former Freshfields senior partner for donkey's years. And my impression has consistently been that he is tough and moral. There is a chance that he could leave Barclays in the embarrassing position of having to make difficult choices about its structure which it might wish to avoid.

It is significant, I think, that in agreeing to lead the review, Anthony Salz insisted on the right to publish his report, even if Barclays itself does not like his analysis or conclusions.

And it is interesting that, for him, the fundamental question is whether it is possible to have an effective single code of conduct for a universal bank like Barclays, when the motivations and instincts of investment banking traders and branch managers are so different.

If he were to conclude that it is pretty difficult to create a homogenous culture of putting the customer first in an organisation that contains both a giant retail bank and a giant investment bank - and my impression is that he is sceptical such a culture can be nurtured and firmly rooted - would that reinforce the case for breaking up Barclays?

As to the nitty gritty, his plan is to make and publish his recommendations by the time of Barclays' next annual meeting in April. He has been told he can interview anyone he likes, including - for example - the Barclays traders accused of trying to manipulate interest rates.

That said, he will not do an investigation of precisely who was responsible for the sins of the past, such as the attempts to rig Libor, the misselling of PPI credit insurance and the inappropriate sales of complicated financial products such as swaps to small businesses. Instead, he will endeavour to understand what it was about Barclays' culture and business practices that allowed those sins to be committed.

So, for example, he will look not only at the content of the group's existing codes of conduct, but how and whether those codes are translated into behaviour. The hope of Barclays is that a single code of conduct for the entire bank can be written and procedures put in place to make it effective.

An 'impossible dream'?

This notion of "One Barclays" is what Bob Diamond was trying to mould before the governor of the Bank of England and the chairman of the Financial Services Authority lost confidence in him, and he quit.

But what if Mr Salz determines that "One Barclays", in a cultural and ethical sense, is a naive and impossible dream?

One solution would be to augment the new financial ring fence between retail banks and investment banks, that is being forced on universal banks by the government, with a behavioural ring fence - such that expectations of the conduct of retail bankers would be different from those of investment bankers.

Or, some might argue, a cleaner solution would be to physically separate the retail bank and investment bank - or to put it in starker terms, to break up Barclays.

 
Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

This column...

This column may be a bit quiet for a bit, because I am away from the office.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 80.

    66.Zap Pow
    This is all a bit like second-guessing a court case - where you weren't in court to hear the actual evidence presented.

    In all fairness to GD/AD (and I am NO fan) they were literally hours from the RBS doors being shut, the ATMs being switched off, the web-site shut down and the phonelines turned off.

    What effect do you think that would have had on UK Plc?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 112.

    #110. gruntfuttock

    "yes. its an idea I got from the banking industry."

    But - didn't you know that the banks are too big to fail?
    See, they did their homework. No jumping into the unknown for them.

    Are you suggesting that as we all fail we all hoist ourselves up by getting into more debt?

    You would make a good banker.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 13.

    11.Zap Pow

    Sonny, Jim, our banks are GLOBAL banks!

    You must work for one of them!

    The UK economy has been run for the exclusive benefit of the global banks for decades - that is why we have no other economy! Right from Mrs T. letting the exchange rate rise to 2.4 US$ = 1£.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 38.

    The uncomfortable truth cuts to the quick of London society.

    Banking has determined a way of getting everyone else to pay for their misdeeds as they busily get everyone else into debt.

    To rein this in would bring opprobrium upon Salz. Everybody wants, needs, requires a growing part of the action. As if it is their god given right.

    And so the juggernaut carries on on its merry way.
    Righteously..

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 46.

    @42
    It's victims? Oh, sorry, 'customers'.
    'swift justice'?
    Doesn't seem to apply to the cream of the criminals, better known as Camerons chums.
    Elections now!

 

Comments 5 of 117

 

Features

  • Baby being handed overFraught world

    The legal confusion over UK surrogate births


  • Bad resultsBlame game

    The best excuses to use when exam results don't make the grade


  • Police respond to a shooting in Santa MonicaTrigger decision

    What really happens before a police officer fires his gun?


  • Child injured by what activists say were two air strikes in the north-eastern Damascus suburb of Douma (3 August 2014)'No-one cares'

    Hope fades for Syrians one year after chemical attack


  • Lady AlbaGoing Gaga Watch

    Social media's use ahead of the independence referendum


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.