Lloyds bigs up the Co-op
With 1,000 branches, 10% of all branches of UK banks, and 7% of the current account market, the enlarged Co-op should represent serious new competition to the giants of British banking.
And for the Co-op, it looks like an amazingly good deal. It is paying a maximum of £750m for 632 branches and for capital that Lloyds is bestowing on the business of £1.5bn - which means there will be a loss on the transaction of up to £750m for Lloyds.
What the Co-op will be getting is a very solid bank: £24bn of mortgages, matched to the tune of 98% by highly desirable retail deposits.
Lloyds is also underwriting the fundraising by the Co-op (the sale of perpetual subordinated debt, since you asked) to pay for the down payment of £400m. So, in effect, Lloyds is lending the Co-op the purchase price.
The Co-op's bank will operate off Lloyds' IT systems, and Lloyds is providing the senior management of the Co-op's enlarged bank.
It is hard to think of any deal in which the seller has provided quite so much help to the buyer. This transaction would be the equivalent of you selling me your house for half its value, in return for an IOU from me, whose value you would be guaranteeing - and you would be throwing in all the furniture and all your possessions (and much of your family) for nothing.
But Lloyds had no choice. It was forced by European regulators to make the divestment. And it felt there was no better deal on offer (and as a semi-nationalised bank, Lloyds' management took some comfort from the chancellor's enthusiasm for bigging up the Co-op)
There is one other thing that the Co-op is getting, and that is the TSB brand. For a few years, the branches being sold by Lloyds will be rebranded as TSB, which is one of the few banking names untainted by the financial and ethical disasters of recent times.
The idea of the rebranding is to deter 4.8 million Lloyds customers, who are being asked to transfer to the Co-op, not to leave in droves: an attempt will be made to reassure all of them that they would be leaving Lloyds for a bank, that if anything, is at least as strong as Lloyds (which may not be that hard, given all the financial, managerial and IT help that Lloyds is handing over).
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~01~RS~)




Hollande signs gay marriage bill
Sick art
Tweets of the week
Clocking out
Most wanted
Can space aid cure hunger?
Fast Track
Comment number 194.
modest_mark20th July 2012 - 22:59
#10 We can now see the results of Gordon Browns shotgun marriage between Lloyds and HBOS
.
.
Verde has nothing to do with Halifax or BOS - it is a project associated with LTSB branches only!
Link to this (Comment number 194)
Comment number 193.
gemma20th July 2012 - 21:56
#163. Dickydido
Nope, the total and breakdown is as follows.
632 branches in total = 164 C&G branches (i.e. all of them) + 185 LTSB Scotland branches (i.e. all of them) + 283 LTSB England/Wales branches (i.e. a selection of them). Voila.
Link to this (Comment number 193)
Comment number 192.
Up2snuff20th July 2012 - 21:52
re#186
Interesting last line, Stan.
A friend clearing papers sent the Labour 2005 Manifesto in my direction. As I try to sit and read through it, I find it so chilling, so barefaced, that I have to put it down after only a couple of pages and take a while to recover.
Link to this (Comment number 192)
Comment number 191.
PigWig20th July 2012 - 20:56
I do not understand the people posing that the Co-op is "ripping off the tax payer". If anyone is ripping of the tax payer it is the managment of Lloyds TSB. They do not have to sell it for that price. They have agreed a deal that appears very favourable to the Co-op. That it the sellers problem, not the buyers.
Link to this (Comment number 191)
Comment number 190.
Removed20th July 2012 - 20:21
All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Link to this (Comment number 190)
Comments 5 of 194