Barclays: Cameron says bank faces 'serious questions'

 

Barclays

Last Updated at 11 Jul 2014, 11:30 ET *Chart shows local time Barclays intraday chart
price change %
207.90 p -
-0.10
-
-0.05

Related Stories

Prime Minister David Cameron has said that Barclays Bank management has "serious questions" to answer over how it manipulated banking lending rates.

Barclays was fined £290m ($450m) after an investigation into claims that several banks manipulated the Libor rate at which they lend to each other.

The Chancellor George Osborne confirmed that HSBC, RBS, Citigroup and UBS are also under investigation.

The scandal hit Barclays shares, which ended Thursday trading down 15.5%.

Other banks shares fell as well, with RBS losing 11.5%, Lloyds down 3.9%, and HSBC giving up 2.6%.

Barclays had acknowledged on Wednesday that its actions between 2005 and 2009 had fallen "well short of standards".

Investigators say that Barclays' traders lied to make the bank look more secure during the financial crisis and, sometimes - working with traders at other banks - to make a profit.

'Who was responsible?'

David Cameron: "The whole senior management team have got some big questions to answer"

Mr Cameron said "the whole management team have got some serious questions to answer. Let them answer those questions first.

"Who was responsible? Who was going to take responsibility? How are they being held accountable?"

Business Secretary Vince Cable said that while it would be "seriously premature" to decide now whether Mr Diamond should be sacked, he added that the Government did have powers to disqualify directors.

"If the facts suggested action - and obviously we would be subject to legal advice; this is a legal process - then indeed that could well follow," he said.

In a statement to the House of Commons, Chancellor Osborne said: "The FSA report is a shocking indictment of the culture at banks like Barclays in the run-up to the financial crisis."

"Through 2005, 2006 and early 2007 we see evidence of systematic greed at the expense of financial integrity and stability and they knew what they were doing," he said.

Currently fines paid by banks help to bring down the levy other financial firms pay to run the regulator.

The Chancellor said the government is looking to change that to make sure the taxpayer benefits from the fines.

Start Quote

An influential shareholder tells me investors may demand the resignation of Marcus Agius as chairman of Barclays”

End Quote

Labour party leader, Ed Miliband, said: "This cannot be about a slap on the wrist.

"The people that have done the wrong thing in this case should face the full force of the law... including criminal prosecutions."

The Serious Fraud Office later confirmed it was in talks with the FSA about the case. This could result in UK criminal proceedings being brought.

The US Department of Justice had already confirmed that criminal investigations into "other financial institutions and individuals" were ongoing.

Regulators say that Barclays manipulated how it reported the interest rates at which banks lend to each other to benefit their traders and financial status.

Tracey McDermott, director of enforcement at the FSA, which imposed fines alongside the US financial regulator, told the BBC that "we need to look at each case on its own particular facts but the initial indications are that Barclays was not the only firm that was involved in this."

George Osborne: "How were such failures allowed to continue undetected and unchecked?"

The current chief executive of Barclays, Bob Diamond, was also in charge of the unit where the manipulations occurred, and is now facing calls for his resignation. On Wednesday, he and three of his top colleagues said they would give up their bonuses this year.

However the Liberal Democrat peer, Lord Oakeshott, said that if Mr Diamond had any shame, he would resign.

Martin Taylor, who was Barclays' chief executive from 1994 to 1998, said the bank had engaged in "systematic dishonesty".

"It's hard to believe that a policy which seems to be so systematic was not known by people at or very near the top of the bank."

Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the Commons Treasury Committee, said it would summon Mr Diamond to account for what had happened.

Mr Diamond later confirmed that he would appear before the committee.

Mortgage deals

Barclays' misconduct relates to the daily setting of the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) and the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor).

These are two of the most important interest rates in the global financial markets and directly influence the value of trillions of dollars of financial deals between banks and other institutions.

They can also affect lending rates to the public, for instance with some mortgage deals.

The British Bankers Association asked the government on Thursday to consider taking over the regulation of how Libor is set.

Crisis jargon buster
Use the dropdown for easy-to-understand explanations of key financial terms:
AAA-rating
The best credit rating that can be given to a borrower's debts, indicating that the risk of borrowing defaulting is minuscule.
'Accepted culture'

The fine imposed on Barclays is part of an international investigation into the setting of interbank rates between 2005 and 2009.

Between 2005 and 2008, the Barclays staff who submitted estimates of their own interbank lending rates were frequently lobbied by its derivatives traders to put in figures which would benefit their trading positions, in order to produce a profit for the bank.

And between 2007 and 2009, during the height of the banking crisis, the staff put in artificially low figures, to avoid the suspicion that Barclays was under financial stress and thus having to borrow at noticeably higher rates than its competitors.

The FSA said Barclays traders were quite open about their routine attempts to manipulate rates.

"Requests to Barclays' submitters were made verbally and a large amount of email and instant message evidence consisting of derivatives traders' requests also exists," the FSA said.

In one instance, a trader recounted a conversation in which he had "begged" the submitter to put in a lower Libor figure.

"I'm like, dude, you're killing us," he said. His manager replied, "just tell him to... put it low".

In turn, the staff submitting the data would respond to the traders' requests.

"For you…anything," said one. "Done… for you big boy," said another.

And: "I owe you big time... I'm opening a bottle of Bollinger."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 1504.

    I can understand why people would want to point the finger at Bob Diamond, but surely fingers also have to be pointed at the FSA? The FSA are the regulatory body for the industry and it is clear from these happenings, that the FSA was not doing a very good job of regulating, or were they turning a blind eye under guidance from the government at the time?

  • rate this
    -368

    Comment number 107.

    Why should Bob Diamond resign? No chief ever knows everything especially if line managers withhold the truth?
    Shame to see Diamond under so much pressure from politicians when so much in politics goes untold. Will Mr Varley former Head of Barclays and Barcap during this fiasco be put under such pressure?

  • rate this
    +84

    Comment number 103.

    Perhaps we need to return to the High Street Bank at Walmington on Sea which dealt in something called "sound money" and who's manager, for all his failings on guard, was well intentioned & honest. Yeah I know, You Stupid Boy, Speedthrills !

  • rate this
    -112

    Comment number 101.

    The bulk of the contributions to this forum seem to support the view that the Banks are run by seriously nasty and dishonest people. To an extent I support this view. The Barclay's Board should ask Bob Diamond to resign or risk losing what little integrity remains.
    But one wonders just what these rates would be like had they not been manipulated. Perhaps we would all be worse off. Who knows?

  • rate this
    +222

    Comment number 96.

    If the banks are guilty of attempting to in effect manipulate interest rates then somebody should be calculating the financial impact that their actions have had on ordinary borrowers so that they can be compensated. In additon to this, those found guilty of such behaviour should be subject to criminal proceedings. I'm hoping that the 'old boy network' won't see this swept under the carpet.

 

Comments 5 of 9

 

More Business stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.