Bank shares jump on new business support plans


Mervyn King: ''The other effect of the euro-area crisis has been to create a large black cloud of uncertainty hanging over our economy too''

Bank shares jumped on Friday in the wake of plans from the Bank of England to launch two new stimulus packages.

The Bank of England's announcement on Thursday came in response to the worsening economic outlook, governor Sir Mervyn King said.

Together with the government, it will provide billions of pounds of cheap credit to banks to lend to companies.

Royal Bank of Scotland was the biggest riser, up nearly 8%. Lloyds rose 5.2% and Barclays 4.2%.

Banks will also have access to short-term money to deal with "exceptional market stresses". The chancellor said the measures would "inject confidence".

But Labour's shadow chancellor Ed Balls said the measure would not be enough to help without the Government also changing course on its austerity plans.

In his annual Mansion House speech, Chancellor George Osborne said the stimulus packages would "support the flow of credit to where it is needed in the real economy".

"We are not powerless in the face of the eurozone debt storm. Together we can deploy new firepower to defend our economy from the crisis on our doorstep," he said.

'Ugly picture'

Sir Mervyn, also speaking at Mansion House, said the eurozone debt crisis had pushed up funding costs in the banking sector, which in turn meant the cost of borrowing for businesses and individuals had risen.

Start Quote

[The Bank of England is saying] if banks are hoarding cash because they fear that any minute now the eurozone crisis will become so terrible that they won't be able to borrow what they need from normal creditors, they can relax, stop hoarding and start lending again”

End Quote

Rob Lee, small business owner: "That money has got to get back to small businesses"

The crisis had also created a "large black cloud of uncertainty" over the global economy, meaning companies and households were cutting back on spending.

Signs of a slowdown in China, India and other "previously buoyant emerging economies" added to the "ugly picture" and meant further action was needed, the governor said.

The Bank has already pumped £325bn into the economy through its quantitative easing (QE) programmes, under which it buys up government bonds. The idea is that the institutions that sell bonds to the Bank then use the money to buy up other assets.

However, there have been criticisms that they have held on to the money, rather than spending it, undermining the effectiveness of QE.

Separately, a Bank of England survey found that the risk of a foreign government failing to repay its loans, or a recession, were still, by a wide margin, the top concerns of senior City executives.

The bank's half-yearly "systemic risk survey", of 73 banks, building societies, insurers and other financial institutions, found that these were still identified as the the two top risks to the health of the UK financial system.


It may not be Plan B - but Plan A is undergoing some fairly significant remedial work.

In the wake of the billions poured into the economy through Quantitative Easing and Credit Easing, we now have two new schemes designed to pump yet more cash into UK plc.

It underlines just how alarmed ministers have become over the unfolding eurozone crisis.

What has added to the concern is the pace at which the crisis now appears to be unfolding.

One Treasury minister noted that on Monday morning, everyone was relatively upbeat following the emergency bailout for Spanish banks. By Monday evening, everyone had been plunged into gloom once more after the markets gave the latest deal the thumbs down.

The Treasury view is that there is now a dangerous mismatch between the pace at which the markets are moving and the arthritic response of eurozone leaders.

The big fear? That not only does a eurozone meltdown risk snuffing out any UK recovery, but it risks consigning the British economy to years in the economic doldrums.

Cheap loans

Rather than further QE to stimulate the economy, the Bank will now offer cheap loans to banks on the basis that they increase lending.

"Today's exceptional circumstances create a case for a temporary bank funding scheme to bridge to calmer times," Sir Mervyn said.

Sir Mervyn added that the 'funding for lending' scheme would provide funding to banks for an extended period of several years, at rates below current market rates and linked to the performance of banks in sustaining or expanding their lending.

But Mr Balls told the BBC that the measure won't work - because Mr Osborne's approach to the economy had been flawed from the beginning: "If you fundamentally think that the reason why our economy is stalled is simply because of the supply of credit to banks you might think you could sort this with monetary policy.

"The reason it's happened in Britain so much harder than other countries is because of the fiscal crunch the chancellor imposed on the economy two years ago, which has choked off our recovery before the eurozone crisis."

The move was not wholly embraced by business.

Graeme Leach, the chief economist at the Institute of Directors, said: "The extended liquidity and funding for lending schemes are welcome, but limited.


Ian Roos

Ian Roos, owner of Scarlett Fuel Solutions, Colchester, Essex

We're a small growing business which cleans out contaminated fuel, for instance from petrol stations, airports, power generators. We've been going for 11 months, trading for six months and we've nine employees. We couldn't get any affordable funding from the banks so we had to turn to Wonga, the payday lender. We borrowed £8,000 over 16 weeks. We'll pay back £9,400. If you work out the APR, it's something like 1,600%, but you can't look at it based on the APR because you only have it for a few weeks, you only pay the interest on the capital for those few weeks.

In principle, it [the government initiative] sounds fantastic; in practice, I'm far more pessimistic about it. The amount of money being offered, considering the number of small businesses there are, is really, really small. And the reality is we have no clear evidence that it will filter down to us. Previous schemes haven't. Banks were not willing to take the risk to invest in us and I can't see this changing that. I've not met one bank manager who's said, "Well, I'll help you get that government guarantee."

Bank lending plan: How will it work?

"The liquidity scheme will need to be massively expanded if break-up and contagion spread across the eurozone... But the core problem remains. Companies alarmed by the euro crisis will not be eager to borrow regardless of the cost."

Peter Hann, banking expert at the Cass Business School, said the measures would have been better applied shortly after the banking crash of 2008, adding that "right now, in a time of weakening confidence, changing confidence is not going to happen just by easing money".

The BBC's business editor Robert Peston said the scheme would be seen as successful if it increased bank lending by £80bn, or 5%.

The governor said he hoped the scheme would be in place "within weeks".

Banking sector liquidity

The second measure he said the Bank would be introducing was a scheme outlined in December last year - called the Extended Collateral Term Repo Facility - to address a shortage of liquidity in the banking sector.

This will make it easier and cheaper for banks to borrow at least £5bn every month to cover any shortfalls in cash.

Further details of the short-term liquidity scheme would be announced on Friday, he said.

Conservative MP Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the Commons Treasury Select Committee, said the plans looked encouraging: "The measures look as if they will encourage lending to businesses by ensuring liquidity is more easily available to banks."


More on This Story

Eurozone in Crisis

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 873.

    a Better idea.
    80,000,000,000 (Money to banks) / 62,000,000 (Approx Population in UK) = £1290.32 Each.

    Now that would do more for the Actual economy letting real people spend in the real economy than giving it to these parasites (Theives) who are supposed to look after our money.

  • rate this

    Comment number 872.

    If anyone wonders what this country will look like in 12 months time, look at Greece, only without the sunshine!

  • rate this

    Comment number 871.

    I thought splashing the money we didn't have was the source of previous bust as current government has been banging on for ever.

  • rate this

    Comment number 870.

    Hooray! Cheap loans to the wealthy elite bankers, who will in turn pass on more expensive loans to the middle classes, making the wealthy bankers richer in the process.

    If Sir Mervyn was a moral person, why does he not make these cheap loans available to the people directly, why must he go through his friends at the big banks? It's immoral to hurt the people in this way.

  • rate this

    Comment number 869.

    The hangover from Labour's orgy of public sector spending goes on and on. Recovery will take many years.

  • rate this

    Comment number 868.

    Banks and Multi-National businesses rule the world! Both are driven by the bottom line, and huge bonuses. Greed, power and corruption has brought many economies to their knees, including ours.
    There are hard lessons to be learned... but Public school boy leaders are blind to the obvious.

  • rate this

    Comment number 867.

    Giving money to the poor would be a quicker way to get the economy moving. They spend more and save less than the well off. Unless the banks actually lend this money out, it will achieve very little. And how about some proper government spending on infrastructure. Like building social housing (not to be sold off) - or renovating schools? Forget PPI !

  • rate this

    Comment number 866.

    Rather than just 'lend' this directly to the banks, who may or may not lend it on to businesses why not tie it directly to business lending, ie when a bank lends a business £x they can get some sort of guarantee that they'll get the money if the business goes bust, but this must be lent at an appropriate rate as the risk to the bank is lower. Alternatively boost business grants with targeted cash

  • rate this

    Comment number 865.

    Why not just lend it directly to businesses?
    That will keep at bay the bankers whose actions caused most of the
    troubles the economy is in at present.
    Or is that too simple an idea?

  • rate this

    Comment number 864.

    834. Civis SO TRUE

    Getting a loan is only worth while if U can make more on it than the loan will cost! Simple economics

    If the work is not there / markets not shifting then I can invest all I like there will not be a return

    Some might say "well get invest in a new market" well 1st off WHERE are they? & 2nd if I found 1 its going to cost way to much to move into it especially in a DEPRESSION!

  • rate this

    Comment number 863.

    The government should lend offer to money to business through small banks such as the Coop and thrifty building societies who do not suffer from fat cats and corporate greed and could easily take on this extra role. Lending money to the big banks has failed and WILL FAIL to get through to small an dmedium sized businesses.

  • rate this

    Comment number 862.

    Come back Gordon Brown, all is forgiven !

  • rate this

    Comment number 861.

    The ECB “loan” of 489 billion euros to European Banks didn't stabilise the EU, inflation continued, ordinaries peoples lives never changed business saw very little of the the money so why would BOE 'new' idea be any better? Is there strict rules to make sure the banks don't put it in tax havens or to pay bonuses?! Try lending directly to people and business and cut out the banks maybe?!

  • rate this

    Comment number 860.

    So if I understand this,

    1) The government issues bonds which are bought by banks Taxpayers will pay, say 3% for this (average of coupon for 1-5 years).

    2) The government loans the money to the banks, presumably at a nominal rate of interest.

    3) The banks maybe loan the money to the taxpayer, either individually or as small business at rates nearer 10%.

    Does it seem like the banks win again?

  • rate this

    Comment number 859.

    I wonder what we will all be doing this time next year.

    Bagsy shotgun in the 4WD pickup driving round town scrapping for food and water Mad Max style.

  • rate this

    Comment number 858.

    You're part of the problem that got us into this mess. I thinks you're living beyond your income and have the cheek to moan at the banks. People with this attitude are as greedy as some of the bankers and totally hypacritical."

    Greedy as bankers? Are you having a laugh? I'm sorry but the people responsible are those who irresponsibly LENT money that was not theirs to lend.

  • rate this

    Comment number 857.

    A pointless headline so early in the day, wait until the end of trading.

  • rate this

    Comment number 856.

    More evidence that the "markets" have little to do with real investment values. Except for some basics, like oil prices and wars, they assess conditions for quick contractual speculations around legislative loopholes. The system keeps channeling our money into bankers pockets, indeces jump up and down almost every day, and we keep hearing pseudo-experts wasting on-air time with fantasy theories.

  • rate this

    Comment number 855.

    I'm sorry that I wasted my vote on this shower. Never again, that's for sure.

  • rate this

    Comment number 854.

    I don't think that supplying more of the Tax Payers money into people who want to borrow for startups will do the trick of kick starting the Nation. I understand there are good ideas but need to be careful at the moment as the times are difficult. Also , many people will take money to set up businesses doomed to fail, which was partly the Downfall of our British Banking system over last decade


Page 25 of 68


More Business stories



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.