Where to find bank stress
I have been directed towards a dramatic shift in the Eurepo curve, by Sandy Chen of Cenkos securities.
You are probably wondering what I've been drinking, given that I find this gripping.
So I had better explain.
The Eurepo curve is a chart which shows what European banks have to pay to borrow when pledging assets - or "repo-ing" - for loans.
Now what is very striking is that the interest rate for borrowing for just a day on this market or for a month is massively greater than borrowing for a year - which is not what you would expect, and was not the case in April.
As I am sure you know, interest rates are normally higher on loans for longer periods, because the conventional view is that for the lender, the risks of lending rise with the length of the loan.
So why would it be significantly cheaper for banks to borrow on the repo markets for a year than for a day (which as I say wasn't so even a month ago)?
Well, as I've been pointing out for some weeks the big threat to banks in eurozone countries perceived to be at some risk of leaving the currency union - such as Greece, Spain, Portugal, and Italy - is an outflow of deposits. And as Stephanie Flanders points out this morning, new data shows this worrying trend is accelerating.
Now, to state the bloomin' obvious, when customers instruct their banks to transfer their money elsewhere, their banks need to find the cash. They can't simply borrow it in an unsecured way from other banks, as they used to do, because that unsecured banking market shrivelled in the credit crunch of 2007-8.
That is why, as I've mentioned before, it is pointless looking at Libor and euribor interest rates for signs of banking stress, because they are semi-irrelevant markets these days.
Instead, the action is in the repo market, where credit is provided in return for assets.
But here is the important thing. In today's world, where it is impossible to borrow in an unsecured way, banks can't afford to lose the assets they pledge to other financial institutions in a repo operation.
So, in stressed market conditions, if you are a bank in need of cash, it is saner to borrow for a day or a week rather than for a year. Because over the course of a year, there is a danger that the bank that you've borrowed from - and is holding your assets as security for the loan - could go bust.
And since the assets you've pledge would be worth considerably more than the loan, that risk of the so-called counterparty collapsing isn't worth taking.
Which means there is much more demand for overnight loans on the repo market than for year-long loans. So the cost of year-long loans is much lower than for overnight loans.
Or to put it another way, the dramatic inversion of the Eurepo curve over just the past few weeks says something disturbing: banks are again fearful of becoming too financially dependent on each other, because they can't be certain which are healthy and which are living on borrowed time.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~21~RS~)




Imran Khan blames rival for killing
Teutonic Texans
Tweets of the week
Clocking out
'It comes rumbling'
Art in the shadow of Hitler
The Culture Show
Comment number 210.
Robbie7773rd June 2012 - 0:50
@208 I know, thats the point really. Chasing high yield at a time like this is a bit risky, i think, and i dont think i have really got time to start again, so preserve what i can, and hope it doesn't get that bad.
Link to this (Comment number 210)
Comment number 209.
U152894713rd June 2012 - 0:46
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 209)
Comment number 208.
BobRocket3rd June 2012 - 0:46
#207 Robbie777
be aware that gold is just a store of value and not an investment, you should be able to buy 16+ (but less than 17) barrels of brent crude for each oz of gold you hold (this has been true over the last 30 years or so)
Effectively zero risk of loss and conversly zero risk of gain in the longterm (it is the Zerohedge :)
Link to this (Comment number 208)
Comment number 207.
Robbie7773rd June 2012 - 0:36
@205 Yes, physical, rather than etf . I just got some good advice at the time, and then did a bit of reading , and it seemed like a safer option than trusting the types of people who caused this mess. Since i was probably a bit late in starting my pension, and not getting any younger, I'd rather trust myself than the "professionals".
Link to this (Comment number 207)
Comment number 206.
Removed3rd June 2012 - 0:20
All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Link to this (Comment number 206)
Comments 5 of 210