BP heads for Russian exit
I said on Tuesday that BP was playing a game of chicken with the Russian billionaires who co-own TNK-BP. What is slightly unclear this morning is whether BP has blinked or put its put foot down harder on the accelerator.
BP has had years of difficult and fractious relations with the troika of billionaires, who work through the AAR consortium. Following the almost total collapse of normal working relations with them, BP's board has decided to try and sell its 50% stake in TNK-BP, following receipt of what it calls "unsolicited indications of interest".
I understand that one of these approaches is from an unnamed Russian state business, which might offer cash and shares for the TNK-BP stake. The Russian billionaires, led by Mikhail Fridman, have also suggested to BP they would perhaps be prepared to buy the British company's stake.
Slightly confusingly, BP also sees the billionaires as potential sellers to BP of all or part of their shares in TNK-BP, although not on terms that BP's board regard as acceptable.
TNK-BP is thought to be worth around $50bn. Strikingly that is less than the $64bn valuation put on it last year by BP - which may cause concern to some BP investors.
But a year ago, the oil price was 25% higher, BP-TNK contained more cash, and there was the possibility of more value being extracted from it via a possible related deal with another Russian energy giant, Rosneft (at that time BP would have bought the billionaires' stake and then sold it to Rosneft).
If BP now succeed in selling its TNK-BP shares - and we probably won't know that til the last three months of the year - it would probably receive $25bn, including a stake in another Russian energy business.
But that is an if - given that BP's Russian billionaire partners have a history of throwing large and disruptive spanners into BP's works.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~00~RS~)




Syria army storms rebel-held town
Teutonic Texans
Getting the hump
Clocking out
'It comes rumbling'
Art in the shadow of Hitler
The Culture Show
Comment number 24.
zygote2nd June 2012 - 10:39
Russia is simply showing the traits of unrestrained capitalism which existed in the UK in the 18th and 19th centuries. It isn't pretty, but it did help to build the British Empire - for good or ill.
Link to this (Comment number 24)
Comment number 23.
ComradeOgilvy1st June 2012 - 21:41
16.Ap
My, my.
It's fine to criticise the Russian government, but not the British politicians? Not noticed the economic policies dictated by the banks and corporations? Not been following Leveson?
You clearly make rash assessments. I lived in France for some time. I managed to cross water on many other occasions too. I'm sure that won't matter to you though when criticizing.
Link to this (Comment number 23)
Comment number 22.
yuri1st June 2012 - 18:38
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 22)
Comment number 21.
Trainee Anarchist1st June 2012 - 18:25
I agree with you wholeheartedly No.9................and then there's the Russians!
Link to this (Comment number 21)
Comment number 20.
Bill Walker1st June 2012 - 16:16
B.P. needs to get out before its assets are seized in an Argentine style take over. Many smaller firms have been brutally taken over by the local Dons who have, as the Russians put it, a "Roof", meaning their illegal actions have been sanctioned by their friends on high.
Link to this (Comment number 20)
Comments 5 of 24