Murdoch 'not fit' to run News Corp

 

The committee itself does not have the power to impose sanctions

The bombshell is on page 70 of the report by the Culture Media and Sport Select Committee into News International and phone-hacking.

It is worth quoting in full:

"If at all relevant times, Rupert Murdoch did not take steps to become fully informed about phone-hacking, he turned a blind eye and exhibited wilful blindess to what was going on in his companies and publications.

"This culture, we consider, permeated from the top throughout the organisation and speaks volumes about the lack of effective corporate governance at News Corporation and News International.

We conclude therefore that Rupert Murdoch is not a fit person to exercise the stewardship of a major international company".

That description of Mr Murdoch by the British parliament as "not a fit person" is likely to have significant consequences.

It will force the board of News Corporation to review whether the 81 year-old, who created one of the most powerful media groups the world has ever seen, should remain as its executive chairman.

It will give ammunition to those News Corporation shareholders who would like to loosen the hold over the company of the Murdoch dynasty.

It will push Ofcom, the media regulator, closer to the conclusion that British Sky Broadcasting is not fit and proper to hold a broadcasting licence, for as long as News Corporation owns 39% of BSkyB.

'Savage criticism'

Nor is that the only one of the MPs' conclusions which will shake News Corporation, and its British subsidiary, News International, owner of the Sun tabloid and of the News of the World prior to its closure.

Mr Murdoch's right hand man for decades, Les Hinton, is deemed to have misled the committee in 2009 by "not telling the truth" about substantial payments to Clive Goodman - the News of the World's former royal reporter who was jailed for phone hacking- and how he authorised those payments.

Mr Hinton is also ruled to have "misled" the committee about the extent of his knowledge that phone hacking extended beyond Clive Goodman and Glenn Mulcaire (the private detective who carried out the hacking on behalf of jounalists).

He is, say MPs, "complicit in the cover-up at News International".

As expected, the MPs are savage in their criticism of the former News of the World editor, Colin Myler, and of Tom Crone, the former legal manager of News International's newspapers, for misleading them about what they knew about phone hacking and for failing to pursue alleged hackers.Murdoch 'not a fit boss', say MPs

But more damaging for News Corporation is that MPs say that senior executives, such as Rupert Murdoch's son James, should have seen that the company's official view, that there was a single rogue hacker, was not sustainable.

The MPs say: "if there was a 'don't ask, don't tell' culture at News International, the whole affair demonstrates huge failings of corporate governance at the company and its parent, News Corporation".

The committee says that News International "wished to buy silence" by settling legal actions with victims of hacking that included confidentiality clauses.

And News International executives are accused of exaggerating the thoroughness of reviews of hacking carried out in 2006 and 2007.

As for those deemed to have misled the committee, Mr Hinton, Mr Crone and Mr Myler, the MPs say it is for the Commons to decide whether they are guilty of contempt.

UPDATE 11:42

I forgot to mention one very important conclusion, that the News of the World and News International also misled MPs as corporate entities.

The MPs say these institutions "exhibited wilful blindness", for which Rupert Murdoch and James Murdoch should "ultimately be prepared to take responsibility".

UPDATE 12:02

The report's verdict that Rupert Murdoch is not fit to run a big international public company was not supported by four Tory MPs on the committee. The disclosure that the vote on this divided along party lines may lessen its force.

In particular, News Corporation's board may well view the verdict as a political judgement, rather than a dispassionate one.

 
Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Is Cameron more Thatcher than Thatcher?

How would a Tory government pay for the tax cuts promised today by David Cameron?

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 349.

    I had thought that it would not be possible for a media magnate of the stance of Hearst or Berlesconi to prosper in the UK.
    Folk would have to be pretty stupid to allow it.
    How wrong could I be...
    Right under our noses Murdoch assembles a news/media empire and gets mainstream politicians hooked up as patsies.

    How do busy MPs find time to suck up to their master?
    Obviously busy ignoring voters...

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 348.

    Merde UK was a big hit for the fans of things can only get bet err by the Brown boys trying to get the most out of themasses whilst sitting on the fence looking for feeAAArt currency on AAA roll to clean up the mess

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 347.

    345. PoorJacques

    Forget any ideas you may have about a UK Spring - the Immigration Services Union are about to indulge themselves on May10th.

    Forget Mr Murdoch and his empire... that was then. Now we have a group which has spotted the opportunity to cash in on a difficult situation. It's pathetic.

    When, if ever, will this country grow-up!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 346.

    327.WOTW
    So if it's 10,000x more - that makes all the difference?
    Seriously - please stop embarassing yourself - go and do something useful like finding signs of recovery

    First 100,000x now 10,000x. I suspect the truth is more like 100x. And I'm embarrassing myself?! Trumpeting signs of recovery (ie something - anything - useful) is not something I'll be expecting from you in the short term.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 345.

    The decision as to how much control of BSkyB NewsCorp should have and indeed the best structure of BSkyB itself rests of course with...Jeremy Hunt. It's a political decision..
    But we have a Tory govt supported by LibDems fulfilling a sort of fellow traveller collaborator quizling role ie doing as they're told
    And Cameron thinks Hunt is only trustworthy in a Court of Law
    We need a UK Spring.

 

Comments 5 of 349

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.