Vodafone, C&WW, and a £5bn tax question

 
Logo outside a Vodafone store If Vodafone acquired C&WW would its UK tax bill be reduced?

A behind-the-scenes battle to acquire Cable & Wireless Worldwide, owner of one of the UK's largest fibre-optic cable networks, is coming to a head.

By teatime on Thursday at the latest, and probably earlier, we should learn whether the board of C&WW, has chosen Vodafone or India's Tata Communications as its new owner.

So what?

A big multinational will buy a medium-sized telecoms company, that specialises in serving businesses, for around £1bn. Aside from the conspicuous fact that takeovers of any size are few and far between at the moment, there is nothing remarkable in that.

However, this deal is of interest in the context of the explosive public debate - fuelled by the government - about whether big companies and wealthy individuals are paying their fair share of tax.

Because what is striking about Cable & Wireless is that it pays very little tax thanks largely to massive capital allowances it generated in constructing its telecoms network.

In its last annual results, C&WW enjoyed a tax credit of £69m and the group said it expected the "current" tax charge to be less than £5m a year "for the foreseeable future". More strikingly, perhaps, the notes to its accounts show a £5.2bn UK "capital loss" - which in theory is permanently available to reduce the tax payable on UK profits.

Now I asked Cable & Wireless whether this so-called "unrecognised deferred tax asset" of more than £5bn would be available to reduce the tax bill of whoever buys the company. The company said the answer was yes, so long as the acquirer is "making profits in the UK telecoms space".

So there is an opportunity for both Tata Communications and Vodafone to reduce their UK bill for corporation tax by buying Cable & Wireless.

Except, of course, there is a huge difference between Tata Communications and Vodafone, which is that Tata currently has no operations in the UK and Vodafone is massive here: last year its UK earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (a proxy for its cash flow) were £1.2bn.

So I asked Vodafone whether one of the reasons it wanted to buy C&WW was to cut its UK tax bill for the next few years.

Here's the thing: the Vodafone official to whom I spoke said he wasn't allowed to say anything about the bid for C&WW, because of new severe strictures imposed by the regulator of takeovers, the Takeover Panel.

Which seems to me to be a bit odd, but there you are. So I have to rely on what anonymous sources close to Vodafone are saying to me. And one of the problems is that those sources are saying contradictory things.

One source says that Vodafone is not certain it would be able to exploit the £5bn unrecognised tax asset, and that it wants C&WW primarily for its 20,500km of fibre-optic cables in the UK and 6,000 business customers.

But another source says the board of Vodafone is acutely conscious that there are tax advantages from the proposed takeover - and the directors are aware that this may cause some controversy.

This is a particularly resonant issue for Vodafone because of its long-running dispute with Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs about how much it owed under the Controlled Foreign Companies rules, which was eventually settled in 2010 when Vodafone agreed to pay £1.25bn. Some MPs on the Public Accounts Committee questioned whether HMRC had let Vodafone off lightly.

Also City analysts have identified Vodafone as a multinational company that succeeds in keeping its worldwide tax bill well below the UK corporation tax rate: in 2010-11, the £1.6bn of "income tax expense" paid by Vodafone represented an implicit tax rate of 17%, compared with the 28% prevailing in the UK at the time.

All of which probably means that if Vodafone ends up as the winner of the auction of C&WW, it will probably need to break its vow of silence and state whether the deal would indeed allow it to slash the tax it pays here.

 
Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

This column...

This column may be a bit quiet for a bit, because I am away from the office.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    It is times like this when we need social conscience motivated individuals to blow the whistle on another predatory corporate squid. The behaviour of these large corporations parallels that of the super rich and their ability to avoid a massive tax bill. At the same time successive government have only seen HMRC as a cost and not as a prime national asset with a mission to maximise state revenues

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 2.

    The government of the day allowed this tax credit to ensure infrastructure build I can't see anything wrong in VOD taking advantage of the fact that the infrastructure has proved insufficiently profitable. I take the view that we are a very RICH country because we have laws we adhere to and consequently decisions to invest capital do not get thrashed because the govt. feels like changing its mind.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    Well theres one thing for sure, they wont be doing it out of the goodness of their heart.

    All of our exalted companies are in the position they are , because they exploit loopholes but can lobby their way out of any problems.

    Thats why foreign companies like to move here, its not for views.Its a about the bottom line.

  • rate this
    +11

    Comment number 4.

    They would be damned if they did, damned if they didn’t.

    They get the large capital allowances for their huge cash investment in the network, which we need to give us the capacity to download angry birds.

    So it’s invest in the network and get vilified for taking capital allowances (which every company does) or don’t and get vilified for not investing.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 5.

    There is nothing that contradictory in the statements. As a commercial deal you would expect Vodafone to play down the tax write-off - if it's worth 5bn then why are CWW's board selling it for less? So playing the we may not be able (for whatever reason) be able to use it and the value is the customers/business is in Vodafones interest.

 

Comments 5 of 85

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.