How to love a Greek default

 
A pedestrian looks at a sign in a shop in Athens reading "One euro, price haircut"

Here's a funny quirk of global financial capitalism: we should perhaps be hoping that Greece defaults tomorrow.

If you fear I've finally surrendered my sanity, here's why a Greek default might be a good thing.

What I mean by a default is that the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, ISDA, decides that there has been a so-called "credit event" relating to Greek government debt, and insurance contracts taken out against this debt, know as credit default swaps, or CDSs, are finally triggered.

As I understand it, ISDA may well reach this historic conclusion tomorrow afternoon.

The point is that some have expressed disbelief that there has not yet been such a credit event, given that private sector holders of Hellenic government bonds are being strong-armed into swapping them for new IOUs worth less than 30% of the face value of the original bonds.

If that's not a default, what is? Or at least that's a refrain you hear a good deal in the City.

But the ISDA viewpoint is that, in theory, this bond swap is voluntary. And if it's voluntary, there's no default.

However, tomorrow the Greek government may well announce that it is coercing those who don't wish to swap old bonds for new into doing so, by activating "collective action clauses" that were retrospectively inserted into the bonds' terms and conditions.

Were this to happen, just under $69bn gross (yes dollars), and $3.2bn of net CDS contracts written against Greek government bonds would be activated.

Which is enough to cause comfort or pain to individual banks and financial institutions, depending on whether they are buyers or sellers of the insurance, but not enough to bring the financial system to its knees.

By contrast, if the Greek CDSs were not triggered, Houston there may be a problem.

The point is that Greece's private sector creditors feel they are being forced into accepting a dramatic writedown of what Greece repays them. And if that were not to trigger CDS payments, what would? Or such at least is the question posed by many bankers and investors.

To put it another way, if ISDA's decision-making committee rules that Greek CDSs are useless for compensating those who had bought the CDSs to protect themselves from the very events that are happening, then it is difficult to see how any CDS contract written on any sovereign credit would have a value.

That, for example, would mean that those who had bought $320bn of protection against default by the Republic of Italy would probably have to write off most of that $320bn, because the insurance contract would be seen to be almost useless.

And there would equally be huge losses for those holding $163bn of protection taken out against Spain, $45bn taken out against Ireland, $64bn taken out against the risk of a default by the UK, and so on.

So failure to declare a default on Greece could render useless and valueless $2.7 trillion of other sovereign insurance contracts - and writing those off might well bring down the odd financial institution and even threaten the health of the financial system.

Which is why, as I said, you should perhaps ask for a Greek default, in your prayers tonight, to prevent additional stress in the financial system.

 
Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Devolve to make us richer?

Would we all be richer if more financial and fiscal powers were transferred from Westminster to big cities?

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 123.

    #122 Just_the_Fax

    the Credit Event means no more haircuts as the bondholders may as well hold out (the insurance is good).

    CDS prices will rise as the likelihood of a successful claim has increased, this means bond prices will rise to cover it.

    Sovereigns are going to fall like nine-pins unless they can find funding outside the market.

    Who's next ? P, I, S or will it be a surprise ?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 122.

    Who gets paid by CDS? It seems that the pension funds and large institutions will take the hit and the hedgies who have bought in with the sole purpose of triggering CDS payout will be paid?!? So to me that looks like more money heading towards the uber rich to the detriment of society... if that is right, it stinks to high heaven. CDS to the bin! Best place for them.

  • Comment number 121.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 120.

    #119

    Yup this is the problem with all kinds of derivatives. It's fine to use as a hedge but trouble comes with using them as a pure trade.

    The best that can be said for the vast sums of dosh churning through the system is that it's a zero sum game - BUT we know that it's inevitable that some players will get more than their fingers burnt with consequences forl all of us - moral hazard anyone ?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 119.

    115. nit123esh
    Buying a CDS without owning any exposition to its principal is not a legitimate contract, it's gambling. And a wicked sort of gambling, one which involves the lives and welfare of innocent people. CDS's should be banned outright and retroactively. Unless linked to some real exposition to the event insured against.

 

Comments 5 of 123

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.