Murdochs: Exit James, enter Rupert
James Murdoch quits newspaper post
"You don't need more than one Murdoch in charge".
That is what a senior News Corporation executive said to me in explanation for why James Murdoch has quit as chairman of News International, the UK operations of the Murdochs' News Corporation.
What he meant is that Rupert Murdoch, with the launch of The Sun on Sunday, is showing that he is back overseeing the group's British newspapers.
So James Murdoch can concentrate on what he is said to enjoy most, which is running News Corporation's television interests outside the US - though, oddly perhaps, he will be doing this from New York, as deputy chief operating officer of News Corporation, the holding company for News International, which is controlled by the Murdoch family.
In a way, this is a remarkable statement. Because it implies that 81 year old Rupert Murdoch isn't planning to retire or step aside in favour of his son any time soon.
News Corp says that in terms of cleaning up the UK newspaper operations, in the wake of the phone-hacking and official-bribing scandals that led to the closure of the News of the World and embarrassed The Sun, much of the work has been done.
There is a new system for vetting expenses payments and new compliance procedures.
So the first and important phase of James Murdoch's programme to rehabilitate the UK media group is over - or so News Corp says.
But perhaps what matters more to James Murdoch is that News Corp's international television businesses, in India, Italy and Germany, have been doing pretty well. And he would prefer to be identified with these than with the bruised Sun.
So if he can concentrate on running those TV interests alone, together with chairing British Sky Broadcasting, maybe his reputation - damaged by the phone-hacking scandal - can be rebuilt.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~27~RS~)




MI5 'approached Woolwich suspect'
Foot loose
Tweets of the week
10 things
Red tales
Art over politics
Click
Comment number 1.
ComradeOgilvy29th February 2012 - 16:05
So, which is it?
Daddy no longer trusts his son, so has packed him off out of the way?
Or
Best move abroad before the investigators get too close?
Neither says much for little Jimmy, does it?
Link to this (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
Derges29th February 2012 - 16:10
I don't care which of them is in charge. As long as a Murdoch runs the company I will not be purchasing anything from them.
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
ComeEnglandAway29th February 2012 - 16:10
Daddy and son need to be in jail with their hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil slippery teflon shoulders.
They've happily hung out a number of their employee's happily enjoying their billions absolutely out of reach of any law.
Money and power. Power and money.
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
Trainee Anarchist29th February 2012 - 16:12
Could not have happened to a nicer chap!
Hope he surfaces to give use his version of the Leveson Report when it's published.
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
mr beige29th February 2012 - 16:13
Regardless of what his Dad lets him run he exposed his own inept managerial qualities over the Gordon Taylor affair - perhaps fetching the tea or photocopy duties are in order at Sky? Anyone with a different surname would surely have been given a cardboard box to pack his office toys in by now.
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comments 5 of 174