Is Britain bent?


Deputy Assistant Commissioner Sue Akers at the Leveson inquiry

She might be wrong, because the cops have been wrong before, but here's what Met Deputy Assistant Commissioner Sue Akers said on Monday at the Leveson Inquiry: that there is a "network of corrupted officials" spanning not just the police but "a wide range of public officials" including military, health, government, prison and others".

My ears pricked up at the words "and others" because it's one of those police-speak terms that could just mean "everybody else" or it could be a codeword for even more sensitive categories, like "the Royal household" or "the intelligence services". We'll have to wait and see: "government" itself is a tantalising word, suggesting as it does not just politicians but, perhaps, civil servants. But, like I say, she could be wrong.

However, if she's not wrong, it hardly matters that it was the Sun "wot done it". What matters is that Britain's public life stands accused by a senior policewoman of being riddled with criminals. Crooks on the take, using public office to line their pockets.

Are we surprised? Well we've had, in the past two decades, the arms for Iraq scandal, cash for questions, cash for honours, MPs' expenses, the dropping of the Serious Fraud Office investigation against BAE Systems on national security grounds, plus all the issues to be covered in the Chilcot Report, when it finally, at long, long, last comes out.

In those two decades, London has quietly become the destination of choice for hot money: whether it's in property, high finance, art or simply cash, only the nationality of the dodgy geezers in black-window limos changes, as the world turns.

But this is different. The common thread in all the previous scandals has been, sadly, parliament. In an age when MPs are encouraged to be - indeed picked to be - "non-ideological", it was probably inevitable that the legislature should be the venue for so many scandals involving self-enrichment. And the common theme to "dodgy London" has been the ill-gotten gains of foreigners.

Now, we have to assume, there is corruption at the heart of major British institutions with better reputations than parliament. The medical profession, the prison service, the civil service, the armed forces? Like I say, she could be wrong.

But if she is right there is an even bigger concern: suppose person A has been taking X thousand pounds from News International, as alleged by Assistant Commissioner Akers. Now suppose person A needs X+N thousand pounds. Are we absolutely certain person A has not been also taking money from, for example country Y? This was the problem uncovered in the Profumo Affair (1963): that once respectable people start frequenting the semi-criminal underworld they are apt to bump into people even more dangerous than criminals.

This is where corruption inquiries always lead: to the heart of darkness.

But who is to lead the inquiry? The News of the World scandal claimed the careers of the Met Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson and his deputy Assistant Commissioner John Yates. Rupert Murdoch owns the Times, Sunday Times and 39% of BSkyB. The current prime minister, given the choice, hand-picked as his right-hand press adviser, a man who has now been arrested as part of the investigation.

Actually, on a day when a major British bank is being stung for "only" £500m of tax avoidance, it's worth saying, on a hunch, that plain old British business is one of the least corrupt institutions: businesses have too many customers, suppliers and rivals for systemic corruption to go unreported. That's my hunch, anyway.

But on the substantive issue, if Sue Akers is right we're going to be very glad we have a non-corrupt judiciary.

Paul Mason, Economics editor, Newsnight Article written by Paul Mason Paul Mason Former economics editor, Newsnight

End of an era

After 12 years on Newsnight, Economics editor Paul Mason has moved on to pastures new and this blog is now closed.

Read full article


Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    It seems more and more people in positions of trust are corrupt,
    MPs,the police,the ministry of defence,the list is endless and nothing is ever done to solve the issue,just paper over the cracks!

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    I could be wrong but the private sector may not be above price-fixing, contract rigging, tax avoiding, pocket-lining, profit hiding and other nefarious practices which make sure the 1% continues to thrive and conquer. Just a guess!

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    Yea yeah, probably is. What will happen about it? Nothing. Every country has its fair share, some more than others. However, when mostt countries corrupted get openly exposed... that's when it ends.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    I'm afraid the answer to the question has to be yes. We do appear to have moved from a state of clear personal ethics to a winner takes all mentality.Ask yourself what incentive our politicians had to curb either the expenses scam and the housing boom when you and I were essentially funding their second homes through the tax breaks and the said homes were rocketing in price...Time to fix things.

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    Yep, the fruits of socialism....the whole of the Warsaw Pact was bent from top to bottom before it finally collapsed in 1989.

    From the point of view of a critical outsider, Britain is a socialist, statist corruption' flourishes from top to bottom from the black economy to (understandable) tax avoidance.


Comments 5 of 73


This entry is now closed for comments


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.