Why Hester turned down the bonus


It was Labour's decision to put Stephen Hester's bonus to a Commons vote that gave the RBS chief executive no option but to say he would not be taking £963,000 in shares.

As an RBS director put it to me, it would have been a great mistake for the semi-nationalised bank to fight parliament to preserve rewards for its chief executive seen by many as excessive.

MPs were expected to vote against the bonus payment - and in those circumstances, it was untenable for him to pocket it. Or at least that was the conclusion that Mr Hester reached tonight in conversation with the bank's chairman, Sir Philip Hampton.

That said, RBS's non-executive directors stand by their decision to award Mr Hester 60% of the maximum bonus he could have earned - because they feel he has strengthened the bank, and they argue that Mr Hester is paid less than his peers.

So in that sense the board feel Mr Hester has made the correct decision in making the financial sacrifice.

His waiving of the bonus lances one boil. But the bank still has to decide what to award Mr Hester under a separate pay scheme, known as the long-term incentive plan - under which he could receive shares worth up to four times his salary of £1.2m.

Stephen Hester RBS still has to decide what to award Mr Hester under a separate pay scheme

But the bank's directors will make no decision on that till they see what other banks, especially Barclays, pay their chief executives. RBS will only wish to reward Mr Hester in line with the perceived market rate or a bit less.

Which is why the bank's directors now bitterly regret having brought forward the decision on Mr Hester's bonus by around a month. It accelerated the decision on the bonus because it was asked to do so by the government - with ministers believing that it was a good idea to get the controversy over the bonus out of the way as soon as possible.

RBS's directors now recognise it would have been far better to delay the bonus decision until after the world had seen what Barclays' chief executive, Bob Diamond, is being paid - because Mr Hester's bonus would not look big in comparison.

Damage has been done by the row, not least to the morale of Mr Hester.

Colleagues say he is not angling to leave the bank - even though he feels bruised by the public scrutiny to which he has been subjected. But if an opportunity to go to another big job less in the spotlight were offered to him, the temptation of leaving might well prove irresistible.

Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

A blacker fiscal hole?

Ten days before the Autumn Statement, the government still looks set to overshoot its borrowing target for the year, even though October's deficit is slightly lower than year earlier.

Read full article

More on This Story


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 716.

    Dear Robert Peston
    We are being "financially cleansed" by the banks after 40 years of self employment and hard work. Our "earned" bonus is about to be taken away with no means of replacing it and no body to bail us out. Any pension we had has gone trying to keep the banks at bay and at 64 it is too late to start again. Do I feel mad. You bet I do!

  • rate this

    Comment number 715.


    It was fun to read, and to be honest I think you take it all far more seriously than you need to (the debating that is, not the economy).

    Take a step back and don't forget to enjoy yourself. You make yourself a target otherwise, and it detracts from your messages - which is a big loss.

  • rate this

    Comment number 714.

    Tim A



    Are you confused what 'employed to do a job' means?

    I suppose I shouldn't bother asking, the fact that you think banks create wealth is testament to your level of intelligence

  • rate this

    Comment number 713.

    I think he deserves his bonus & am glad we have someone with such strong credibility running our bank - if he has 1/2 an ounce of sense he'd go earn more money elsewhere without the publicity and then where would that leave us? Some half wit in charge trying to sort out our mess?? The anti-business rhetoric from the Beeb and politicians (including the Tories) is madness, WE NEED WEALTH CREATORS!

  • rate this

    Comment number 712.


    Fun..it was not

    it was like pulling teeth (your own with a piece of string and a door)

    The funny bit is that the argument I 'lost' was how many teams in the premiership - the argument I 'won' was what effect does QE have on growth figures

    I'm quite happy with the result. I couldn't care less how many teams are in the premiership but I do care about whether we're in a depression or not


Comments 5 of 716



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.