Treasury feared Hester and board would quit
The Treasury is convinced that the board of Royal Bank of Scotland has taken its views into account, in paying a reduced bonus to Stephen Hester, chief executive of Royal Bank of Scotland.
But it is pretty difficult right now to judge whether that is true. Here is why.
Mr Hester is receiving 60% of his maximum bonus entitlement.
Now RBS, under enormous political and media pressure, is the first bank to award a bonus for the boss.
So we simply don't know whether receiving 60% of the maximum will turn out to be more or less than other bank chief executives will pocket.
“Start Quote
End QuoteIf RBS's share price recovers from its current nadir, that bonus will be worth considerably more”
It has been a difficult year for banks, so 60% could turn out to be par for the course - in which case it would be difficult for the Treasury to claim that RBS is paying less than the norm.
At the current RBS share price, Mr Hester's all-share bonus is currently worth £963,000.
If RBS's share price recovers from its current nadir, that bonus will be worth considerably more. But as taxpayers we should, of course, fervently hope the price does recover, since we own 82% of the bank.
There is already huge criticism of the payment to Mr Hester.
Brendan Barber, general secretary of the TUC, has just popped in to the BBC's spartan office here in Davos to describe the payment as a "huge mistake", at a time when "other" servants of the state are enduring pay freezes and cuts to their pension entitlements.
So why did the chancellor and prime minister allow RBS to pay any bonus at all?
Well I am reliably told that they feared Mr Hester and much of the board would have quit, if the payment had been vetoed by the government as the majority shareholder.
In the words of my source, the mass resignation of RBS directors would have created "all sorts of bigger problems".
However even if the government rides out the criticism of Mr Hester's bonus, it will not be the end of the story.
RBS tells me it has not yet decided how much it will award Mr Hester in respect of his Long Term Incentive Plan or LTIP. And this will inevitably be worth considerably more than the bonus.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~43~RS~)




Giant Oklahoma tornado kills dozens
Smarter future
Light relief
Food swappers
Unlocking secrets
A leaf from nature's book
Click
Comment number 1.
Groucho Meldrew26th January 2012 - 20:51
Re Mr Cameron and the bonus culture, words, unlike bankers are cheap,
Yours aye,
Graucho
Link to this (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
Robin Gitte26th January 2012 - 20:54
Long Term Incentive Plan.
Not a bonus?
You couldn't make it up.
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
stanilic26th January 2012 - 20:58
This just goes to prove once again that the arrangements entered into by the previous government with regard to the rescue and continuance of RBS were made in haste without any expectation that this would become a lasting arrangement.
It is quite simply a mess.
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
Davej26th January 2012 - 20:59
Hmm..... Share Price when Mr Hester was appointed 65p
Share Price Today 28p
I must have got this wrong somewhere along the line ?
Payment by results, I don't think so !
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
DrC26th January 2012 - 21:00
Mr Hester and much of the board would have quit ...
And there are not enough competent people in the tier below to make an interim governing body? Does not each of them have a competent deputy? Another reason why the top tier should go.
But would they?
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comments 5 of 726