The rising costs of eurozone rescues

 
Euro logo

The eurozone has two bailout funds of any size at all: the European Financial Stability Facility, which exists now, and the European Stability Mechanism, which is supposed to be launched in July.

They exist (mainly) to lend to governments deemed to be solvent but which can't borrow from investors.

Even before Friday's downgrades by Standard & Poor's of nine eurozone governments, there were already concerns that the bailout funds' resources were inadequate to rescue a state with huge debts, such as Italy.

So a particularly damaging consequence of S&P's decision to strip Austria and France of their AAA ratings is that the two bailout funds will have even less to lend, if the funds themselves want to retain their own AAA ratings.

The reason (slightly simplifying) is that any lending by the bailout funds is backed by eurozone countries - and if fewer eurozone countries have a AAA badge, then a much smaller amount of lending by those funds would be underpinned by support from AAA governments.

That is one reason why the Chancellor, George Osborne, is concerned that eurozone countries aren't doing enough to prevent a breakup of their currency union. This is what he told the Today Programme this morning:

"I think what the euro needs to do is show convincingly that it can stand behind its currency. We haven't actually seen much evidence of the pooled resources needed by the euro to actually provide confidence to the market that they will stand by their own currency."

Eurozone leaders face a tricky choice.

They can abandon the idea that the bailout funds need a AAA rating. The German chancellor Angela Merkel suggested over the weekend that this may be the better way to proceed.

But were the bailout funds to go AA or AA plus, the costs for the bailout funds of borrowing would probably rise.

And the funds might have difficulty raising money from some high profile investors, such as China, whose participation would have huge symbolic value.

The alternative of asking eurozone governments to increase their financial backing for the funds to sustain both their AAA and their lending capacity would however place quite a strain on the balance sheets of eurozone governments, especially that of Europe's biggest economy, Germany.

According to new research by Royal Bank of Scotland, if eurozone leaders wanted to do what Mr Osborne implies they should do and double the lending capacity of the European Stability Mechanism from what it was prior to the S&P downgrade, eurozone countries would have to provide capital equivalent to 2.6 trillion euros, or 27% of euro area GDP.

All of which is a long-winded way of saying that the downgrades of France and Austria have dealt a hefty blow to the eurozone's ambitions of establishing bailout funds with sufficient liquid resources to douse whatever fires erupt in the currency union.

And that matters more than ever, with Greece teetering on the brink of default because of an impasse in debt-reduction talks between the Greek government and its private-sector creditors.

If Greece were to default, investors would only be persuadable that Portugal, Ireland and even Italy and Spain won't be next in the queue to renege on what they owe, if the two bailout funds have access to an ocean of emergency money.

Following the S&P downgrades, the bailout funds are endowed with what looks like a puddle or pond, rather than a great sea of money stretching beyond the horizon.

UPDATE 18:48

S&P has tonight downgraded the European Financial Stability Facility, Europe's rescue fund, by one notch to AA plus from AAA.

It warned there could be further downgrades if the finances of eurozone members were to weaken further.

Eurozone members now have to decide whether to reconstruct the bailout fund to restore the AAA or whether to take the downgrade on the chin, with the possible consequences I mentioned earlier.

 
Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

How Labour pays for student fee cut

Labour would reduce tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more a year, shrink maximum pension pots to £1m and cut maximum annual pension contributions to £30,000 to pay for a cut to £6,000 in student fees.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Robert

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 117.

    #113.Megan
    "Only losers: the parasites who caused the mess in the first place."

    i.e:
    (1) governments that went on uncontrolled spending sprees and inflated non-productive public sectors
    (2) "taxpayers", large and small, who evade (not avoid, which is legal) their tax bills
    (3) consumers who borrowed and consumed like there was no tomorrow.

    Or did you have someone else in mind?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 116.

    The only real uncertainty is who will be the final nail straw that etc

    There is no wriggle room.

    Without global redistribution of wealth to the many the consumer society cannot grow..

    The Economic money model is broken and can't be fixed.

    To avoid a repeat of WW2 We need leaders(w)hip and ACTION now

    This going to end in tears very soon for any economy not growing

    Soup anyone

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 115.

    Looks as if there will be another "90 day" watch by ratings agencies.
    Going off the record to date, if the EU, as normal practice, carry on by just criticising rating agencies they will miss the point.
    If they do nowt now about the finances,which seems normal eu practice, in 90 days S&P will again look at commitment, and AA rating will be fond distant memory.
    Lions led by donkeys!
    Democracy EU???

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 114.

    When I consider the extent of the happening failure of the Eurozone it reinforces my scepticism over the European 'project'.How many highbrowed politicians and eurocrats did it take to lead us into this mess. Dangerously we still see these same people seeking to continue on the same path to ruin. History will reveal the extent of this folly.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 113.

    Time to declare a Jubilee. All debts cancelled. Start over, sustainably. Live within your means - which most of us - states, businesses, individuals - can do if we didn't owe anyone anything. Only losers: the parasites who caused the mess in the first place.

 

Comments 5 of 117

 

Features

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.