How will the two speed Europe get into gear?

 

We had been kidding ourselves. It always felt, when you covered a Brussels summit, that Britain was there on sufferance, but the rules said otherwise: technically we were and are an equal member of a 27-nation union whose oft-explained "three pillars" of governance were applied for the common good.

Now, as is clear from Thursday night's summit statement, these common institutions are to oversee a selective "fiscal compact".

The European Commission (which the UK sits on) and the parliament (which it sits in) will adorn the architecture of a strategic economic compact which the UK is excluded from. That is the problem Prime Minister David Cameron had to confront last night.

Now there is a two-speed Europe and in order not to give up sovereignty Britain had to give up power. The long term impact is not calculable: it depends on whether the smaller, 17+ pact of euro countries, can save the single currency, avoid a slide into default and break-up, and find a way out of perpetual deflation, social unrest and poverty for the five peripheral countries.

Here is how they plan to do it:

  • The European Central Bank (ECB) will, in the short term, act as an agent for the EFSF fund
  • The European Stability Mechanism (ESM), the permanent fund, will be rushed forward to begin by 2012, with an effective lending capacity of 500bn euros. Instead of acting by mutual agreement it will have voting rights, with an 85% majority needed for emergency action. This strengthens the hand of north Europe over the south and is - in my view - the signal point of a north-European takeover of European fiscal sovereignty
  • Euro-zone countries will provide an extra 200bn euros to the International Monetary Fund, which it is understood the IMF will then add to the funds available above, chipping in its own 250bn euros already pledged
  • Probably then the ECB will step in with its long-awaited couple of hundred billion - which is already out there in the marketplace and just needs to be unleashed as long term rather than short term lending.

The fiscal compact, then, is a step towards unleashing just over 1tn euros worth of lending. This should be enough to take Italy and Spain out of the bond market shooting gallery for a year.

Meanwhile, however, the fundamental problems of Europe are racing towards us like a tidal surge. Three French banks were downgraded on Friday, and it is possible some euro countries will now face downgrades. But the investors are not waiting for downgrades: they are dumping exposure to the south European countries who have just signed up for a decade of austerity - because they just don't think the whole plan is sustainable.

In summary, I think what was achieved for Europe last night was the buying of time. But time to do what? Opinion among the economists and business people I speak to is divided: some think the fiscally united eurozone can overcome the short-term dip that will now happen and emerge as a strong, globally competitive area. Others think it's set for catastrophic breakdown.

I can only add at this stage that, by enshrining in national and international law the need for balanced budgets and near-zero structural deficits, the eurozone has outlawed expansionary fiscal policy.

It has done what the US Republicans would like to do - and if you think about it, it has made what Gordon Brown did, and what Barack Obama (and indeed Wen Jia-bao) is doing illegal.

The result, if it works will be stability. It is hard to see how it promotes long-term growth.

 
Paul Mason Article written by Paul Mason Paul Mason Former economics editor, Newsnight

End of an era

After 12 years on Newsnight, Economics editor Paul Mason has moved on to pastures new and this blog is now closed.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 5.

    As you highlight Paul, they have outlawed the ability of governments to act in the public interest in a time of crisis. The human social and economic cost of this move will be enormous. In perhaps 10 years time we will ask 'how on earth did they get away with it?' I only hope that the eurozone will break up sooner rather than later, for the sake of those living in it (bankers excluded).

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 4.

    Long-term the fiscal compact & Euro cannot work. Unless there is perpetual redistribution from northern Europe to southern Europe, southern Europe will be trapped in poverty by a Euro "gold" standard, & eventually, a nationalist politician will lead a southern European country out of the Euro, whatever the pain.

    This is a huge mistake by Merkel. Germany risks being detested by southern Europe.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 3.

    Not just a catastrophic breakdown for the euro but for world capitalism.

    As this euro crisis is more than a euro crisis; it's a crisis of value.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 2.

    It doesn't matter if it's enshrined in EU law, come the next bubble the greedy countries will find a way to borrow too much and mask it and the more sensible countries will probably overlook it...

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 1.

    What it buys Paul is time for the re election of Sarkosy and Merckle. And as others have said on other BBC blogs, fining countries that are broke will do what? The rules need to allow the EU to stop bankers lending to them. (how do you do that in a free market economy?) How will you make the Southern Europeans actually play by the rules when they get extreme left or right governments elected?

 

Page 2 of 2

 

Features

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.