A happy ending for the euro?


The ECB president's comments before the European Parliament this morning have added to a mood of cautious - very cautious - optimism about the eurozone crisis, just as the governor of the Bank of England has highlighted the great risks for UK banks.

How so? Well, out of the confusion of finance ministers' meetings and diplomatic phone-calls, investors are starting to see the outlines of a compromise deal to "save" the euro.

Mario Draghi's remarks have added to the picture.

But goodness knows, we have been here before: there's still plenty of details to fill in, and plenty of time for disappointments. Also, even the most optimistic versions of the deal say nothing about the re-balancing of the European economy, which is not happening and will be crucial for any long-term success.

Mario Draghi says "a credible signal is needed to give ultimate assurance over the short term"

The rosy scenario is a story of three acts, and as ever, the fiscal comes first. Chancellor Merkel will not budge on anything until she gets agreement on a new fiscal pact for the eurozone.

As Mario Draghi repeated today, the ECB needs this too: governments have do their part to make this a viable union, both right now and into the future.

Legal bind

In the end, they need to change the treaties to legally bind countries into accepting collective control of budgets. But in the short term, Draghi seems confident a stop gap is possible which would help "frame expectations" in the markets.

Some ECB watchers think it will encourage the ECB to do more as well. Here's part of what he said on the fiscal pact. Later I'll get to what he said about the ECB: "On the precise legal process that brings about a move towards a genuine economic union, we should keep our options open. Far-reaching Treaty changes should not be discarded, but faster processes are also conceivable."

If you assume this kind of fiscal pact is now within the leaders' grasp, plus some revamped policy commitments from countries like Italy, we would then move to the second act in this feel-good tale, in which Germany agrees to some form of collective underwriting of eurozone debt.

Even on the optimistic view, this is presumably not going to be eurobonds, which the German Chancellor has trashed so often, and so recently. But, short-term, her agreement to stand by a more ambitious version of the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) could do the same job.

When I say "more ambitious", I mean a lot more ambitious than the options for leveraging the EFSF which emerged out of European finance ministers meeting on Tuesday.

Bank of EFSF

You'd need something like turning the EFSF into a bank, which could borrow from the ECB to lend to governments (I wrote about this idea in September - see Central banks and the 'spirit of 2008' ).

Germany still seems quite far from accepting this. But the optimists say, it might still be possible to jump to Act 3, in which the ECB responds to the future promise of fiscal union - and the clear and immediate threat of a serious credit crunch - by launching much more aggressive purchases of Italian and other sovereign debt.

Didn't Draghi rule out precisely this kind of rescue today, repeating the old mantra that the ECB's bond purchasing scheme was "temporary" and "limited", and solely designed to make monetary policy work more effectively?

The answer is yes. But then he clarified that temporary and limited meant that it wasn't "eternal" or "infinite".

To me - and others, such as Julian Callow, at Barclays Capital - that is sending a rather different message than we've heard before. It allows for the possibility that the ECB will up the pace of purchases quite substantially, especially if the tensions in bond markets intensify.

After all, very few things in this world are infinite or eternal. The bond purchases might not be either of these things, and still be pretty large - and long-lived.

Though Draghi also explicitly ruled out the ECB lending to governments - or "subsidising" them - he chose to remind everyone that the ECB was a "lender of last resort' to solvent banks.

This has not previously been a phrase that ECB officials have used very often recently, even in connection with banks.

Enormous sum

Given all the criticism the ECB has been getting about its failure to be a "lender of last resort" for the Euro, you have to wonder whether Draghi wanted to remind his audience that the ECB was already playing that function, to a significant extent, in the enormous amounts of emergency liquidity it had provided periphery banks (see blog Sir Mervyn King's two messages).

That emergency liquidity has not followed the Bagehot formula for last resort lending, because there has been no penalty rate, and the institutions concerned are not necessarily solvent - notably the Greek ones. But these banks have been required to offer collateral, as Bagehot would have wanted. And crucially, that collateral (mostly national sovereign bonds), has been marked to current market value.

That is critical for the ECB, because it means the liquidity has "only" been propping up the financial system in countries like Greece. It has not been directly propping up the governments.

But, if countries like Italy start to lose market access altogether, then you could see how the ECB could end up playing "lender of last resort, one step removed", effectively funding private bank purchases of Italian bonds.

No white charger

So, we are back to the main issue: will we see the ECB play a bigger role in "saving" the euro? I think it's inevitable. And I think Draghi is very carefully preparing the way.

But governments will need to do a lot, too. And even then, don't expect him to ride in on a white charger labelled "lender of last resort to governments". It is much more likely to come a part of a monetary policy response to the dramatic deterioration of the economic situation, which will be exacerbated in the periphery by barely suppressed panic in sovereign bond markets.

In other words, the ECB's "rescue" it is likely to look more and more like quantitative easing. This, of course, is all speculation.

And Mervyn King is still right to say that the central bank, alone, cannot fix the crisis.

But it is intriguing food for thought.

Stephanie Flanders Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 138.

    A common market was a good idea. Trade is good for peaceful relations. Monetary union between totally different countries is impossible. I hear that the Italian economy is largely traded in cash and details never reach ,the tax offices. Greece has more expensive cars than tax payers. It's like trying to get the mafia and the police to share the household budget.
    It's not working chaps

  • rate this

    Comment number 137.

    While Merckel, Sarkozy, and others like Boroso scramble around inventing a new treaty that would take years to negotiate and pass, more than a few financial experts are giving 50-50 odds that the Euro won't survive until Christmas.It reminds me of Hitler in the Fuhrer bunker at the end dreaming new schemes with nonexistant armies to win the war as the Russians were pounding Berlin with artillery

  • rate this

    Comment number 136.

    Yes US T-bonds and USD cash. But not if you are China - these are diminishing interests.

    Catastrophe Theory - there will come a critical threshold when the energy producers switch from USD to USD/Euro/RMB.

    Some interests want a smooth changeover, some interests would rather see global war in the name of a conservative Republic. Kapis?

  • rate this

    Comment number 135.

    E 129

    Euro papers write equivalent rubbish to the UK press which blames the Eurozone for our problems now they`re tired of blaming Brown.

    It`s safer than identifying the real culprit which is a collapse of private capital,sovereign debt being the current phase.

    It`s scary isn`t it,think wartime.The scale of the crisis is huge

  • rate this

    Comment number 134.

    133 It's too bad they don't force all EU leaders including MPs, MEPs, and bureaucrats to reveal where their own personal assets are invested.If they did, I'd be surprised if most of them are not invested in Euro denominated assets. Maybe gold or Swiss francs. In fact the number one safe haven in the world for large institutions remains US Treasury obligations.


Comments 5 of 138



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.