£30bn of extra cuts keep Osborne on track, just

 

Here's my snap assessment of the Autumn Statement. First the big analytical takeaways:

  • The government will only just hit its self-imposed target of eliminating the structural deficit by 2016. The OBR document says its central forecast is to get rid of the structural deficit by 2016-17 but only by "a total discretionary cut in non-investment spending and in the CACB of £30bn or 1.5 per cent of GDP in 2016-17" - that is £30bn of extra austerity, in the form of pay freezes in the public sector and down rating of tax credits
  • George Osborne will borrow £111bn more than Alistair Darling projected over the parliament
  • The money to bring forward infrastructure projects is coming from further suppression of public sector workers' pay, from overseas aid, from tax credits and by radically moving forward the date of retirement at 67 to 2026.

There is a fair bit of tentative dirigisme in there: a national infrastructure plan; transport links upgraded with macro-economic design; exemption from carbon targets for crucial industries; 100% capex tax exemption in the north of England.

It poses the old question in a new way: can we stimulate a new kind of growth, based on manufacturing and exported goods in time to rebalance the economy; and can we avoid a second recession by printing money for long enough so that the £111bn Osborne is taking out of demand does not tank the entire economy.

But none of this factors in the results of the euro crisis. As I write the evidence of a credit crunch in the European banking system is spilling out. Even if Merkozy get their act together and avoid Eurogeddon, it is going to hit growth in our biggest export market.

I think this changes the "Plan A vs. Plan B" debate as follows: Plan A is significantly amended - there will be a high chance of missing the fiscal target; but Labour's "Plan B" must take account of the OBR's damning judgement about what Labour did to the structural deficit.

We are now about to find if a bit of dirigisme, a lot of austerity, and swathes of printed money can a) prevent recession b) turn the economy around c) get a coalition of Conservatives and Lib Dems elected - should they wish to be so - in 2015.

I don't think this will provoke a wave of public sector strikes on top of the pensions unrest already under-way. What it does is tee up a much bigger electoral pitch by Labour to the public sector workforce.

There is now no chance of a sustained recovery, either in the real economy or the public finances, by the time we get to the pre-election period.

 
Paul Mason Article written by Paul Mason Paul Mason Former economics editor, Newsnight

End of an era

After 12 years on Newsnight, Economics editor Paul Mason has moved on to pastures new and this blog is now closed.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 29.

    I've not come across one sane argument in favour of maintaining the index linking of benefits by 5% when the wokers and tax payers of the country have increases frozen if any at all. I can only see this as a vain attempt by Clegg, Cable & Co to save some of their deposits at the next election. Anyone got an answer why Alexander seems keen to outdo the Tories in austerity?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 28.

    #5 alanhunter99 scaling has been successfully attempted - X Factor - oh sorry they don't play instruments do they?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 27.

    Dear Mr Mason,
    Like the rest of my household I am unable to get a grasp on the billions that are being manipulated by our Government. Would it be possible to translate the numbers to say, per BBC licence holder? or per capita. I think we could then comprehend the key numbers and fully understand what the politicians(and pundits) are saying.
    Thank you for your fine work,
    Yours Sincerely,

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 26.

    Watching the statement yesterday raised a question of the capacity of our politicians:do our politicians ever have to under go random (or even targeted) drug screening tests?

    I am not for one moment suggesting that Mr.Osbourne apparently 'wired' demeanor and troublesome tickly cough was in any way related to cocaine misuse...I just would like to know the answer to my question.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 25.

    Might it be the most statesman like thing he has ever done for Gordon Brown to write a personal letter of apology for going so far over the limit on the national credit card - while grinning and jeering at all the sensible commentators who warned about state debt. More prune than prudent.

 

Comments 5 of 29

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.