Cyclists 'urged to get insurance'
Many cyclists take to the road without considering insurance
Not having a comprehensive insurance policy could prove costly, cyclists have been warned by the Association of British Insurers (ABI).
It says those hurt in an accident, or found responsible for causing one, may face bills of thousands of pounds.
Cycle use is now around 20% higher than it was in the late 1990s.
However, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, funded by the insurance industry, provides compensation to victims of uninsured drivers, including cyclists.
Department for Transport figures show accidents involving cyclists rose by 12% in the first half of 2011 compared with the same period a year earlier.
Rising costsPepe Tozzo ended up in hospital after colliding with a car while cycling home from work in South Wales.
He recalls how he collided with the side of a van that emerged from a side road, as he was riding down a hill.
The driver of the vehicle involved in the collision had no insurance or driving licence. With no personal injury or legal cover, the costs for Pepe were soon spiralling out of control.
He recalls spending a week in hospital, three months off work, and a year recuperating to get his leg back to normal.
Pepe Tozzo says that a collision led to months spent recovering
"There has been a long lasting legacy," he says.
"It probably knocked my career back by one year."
It is not compulsory for cyclists to have insurance. Cycle use in the UK has been increasing in recent years, up about 20% compared with the late 1990s.
With the number of accidents also rising, Malcolm Tarling, of the ABI, says there is now a strong case for all cyclists to have personal injury and third-party cover.
"If you are a cyclist and you are involved in an accident the chance of you being injured are quite high," he says.
"Some 230 cyclists a month are killed or seriously injured on the roads so there is a good chance you are going to be off work for weeks, if not months, so some sort of insurance to cover you for loss of income makes sense."
He says cyclists often underestimate the risks they face when they are on the roads, in particular if they are in an accident where they are found to be at fault themselves.
"If you are a cyclist and you are involved in an accident and you are at fault for causing it you could be sued for damages," he says.
This could amount to hundreds or thousands of pounds, he claims.
"If you are cyclist you should always have some form of liability insurance. It is essential."
Lower premiumsHowever, many cyclists do not have comprehensive cover.
Tom Bogdanowicz, from the London Cycling Campaign, says many think they are fully covered by their household contents policies but these do not always go far enough.
Tom Bogdanowicz says specialist insurance policies are available for cyclists
"Household insurance policies are general insurance. They do not provide specialist cover that you might need whether it's for theft or for third party," he says.
"So if you go to a specialist insurer or to a cycling organisation to get that sort of cover specifically aimed at cycling, that is what the policy is designed for and you benefit from that."
Although cyclists may be more vulnerable on the roads, statistically they are less likely to be responsible for an accident than a motorist - and that is reflected in the premiums.
A specialist policy can cost £30 to £40 a year. This typically provides third-party or public liability cover - the costs of causing accidents to other road-users and their property.
It also usually covers damage to the bicycle following an accident and the cost of a replacement bicycle if it is stolen or damaged.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~31~RS~)


Apple 'among US's big tax avoiders'
Search for US tornado survivors
Smarter future
Food swappers
Unlocking secrets
A leaf from nature's book
Click
Comment number 482.
Transition_Town_Man26th November 2011 - 19:38
I've suddenly twigged what's going on. Insurance companies bosses have realised that insurance policies sold to cyclists are like to be much more profitable because, and here's the rub, it's very rare that cyclists cause accidents. With each car insurance claim going through the roof, it's hardly surprising they getting the beeb to do a bit of lobbying.
Link to this (Comment number 482)
Comment number 474.
Think Panzer26th November 2011 - 19:28
I find that cyclists are the biggest hazard to traffic on the roads today. I say this not because I am anti-cyclist but as a matter of fact. Many drivers don't like having to overtake cyclists on busy roads as it puts them at real risk of being hit by cars coming in the other direction. I think that the cycling proficiency test should be compulsory. Cycles should be taxed and have insurance.
Link to this (Comment number 474)
Comment number 459.
corncobuk26th November 2011 - 19:07
I don`t think this is a car versus bike issue but a good road user versus bad road user issue. There are both good and bad drivers and cyclists. Car drivers have to have insurance for any injury or damage done for which they are at fault and i don`t consider it unreasonable that cyclists should have insurance for those very same reasons.
Link to this (Comment number 459)
Comment number 227.
Kristal Tips26th November 2011 - 13:55
Interesting that any post stating that cyclist can and do cause accidents get marked down.
Many cyclists are sensible, wear bright clothing, helmets, and obey the rules of the road. Sadly, they are also the ones that would buy the insurance as another form of protection, it's the reckless ones who give the rest a bad name, who cause all the problems, that wouldn't dream of getting any.
Link to this (Comment number 227)
Comment number 221.
rupertrogue26th November 2011 - 13:49
Oh for goodness sake. I suppose if you cycle every day in central London, maybe, but otherwise this is just another way we will be registered, controled and parted with our money. This has not been a serious issue for the past 100 years but I'm sure the insurance companies would love it to become one in our health and safety mad culture of today.
Link to this (Comment number 221)
Comments 5 of 11