Sluggish UK economy means slower Lloyds revival

 
Lloyds Bank signage

Lloyds has today joined Royal Bank of Scotland in warning that it expects to fail to meet targets for profits growth over the next three years saying that the British economy is not recovering as fast as it had hoped.

To be clear, this downgrading of the UK's growth prospects cannot be laid at the door of the eurozone's crisis - or at least only a part of it can.

It is much more to do with the belated recognition by banks and businesses of how the "deleveraging of the British economy" - the attempt by households, government and businesses to reduce the burden of debt bearing down on them - is squeezing consumption and economic growth.

As I've been banging on about here for years, it is that record aggregate burden of debts accumulated by the British economy - equivalent to around four times the value of everything we produce each year, more than for any major economy other than Japan's - which is the back-achingly heavy weight that means the UK's growth will for many years probably be nearer 1% than the 3% enjoyed for the 16 years to 2008.

What is striking is that businesses appear to be lagging investors in downgrading expectations of growth. After Marks & Spencer and Lloyds this morning delivered relatively downbeat messages about their respective prospects, their share prices rose.

Now, of course, any delay by Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds in hitting profit targets carries a number of implications.

These are the two big banks in which taxpayers have huge stakes - so if their profits growth is more sluggish, that will also mean a postponement, probably a lengthy one, to taxpayers getting back all those tens of billions of pounds they've invested in the banks through their privatisation.

There is of course a paradox here. Some will say the banks are partly to blame for the sluggishness of the economic recovery, having pumped up the leverage in the boom years and now - in this era of so-called de-risking and deleveraging - starving businesses with good growth prospects of the credit they so badly need.

That said, the banks are more-or-less hitting the so-called Merlin targets, agreed with the Treasury, for lending to businesses, including small businesses. Lloyds today became the latest bank to say it's on course to meet those targets.

But what has become increasingly clear, in the Treasury and in the Bank of England, is that the Merlin targets are a blunt instrument. They are not stimulating the provision of credit to the businesses perceived to be intrinsically riskier, but whose prospects for long-term returns are also best.

Which is why the chancellor is committed to using taxpayers' money to underwrite the riskier elements of small-business loans, in a new initiative called "credit easing" - whose details are yet to be announced.

Which takes us to another paradox. The Treasury will be nationalising the provision of loans to small businesses through credit easing, because of the perceived failure of the semi-nationalised banks, Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds, to direct money where it is most needed.

 
Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

This column...

This column may be a bit quiet for a bit, because I am away from the office.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 1.

    Really?

  • rate this
    +17

    Comment number 2.

    I don't suppose it will stop the senior management at Lloyds continuing to take grossly inflated salaries and bonuses though !

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 3.

    When meltdown part 2 comes all what's left of the banking sector will be nationalised.
    So let's write-off everyones mortgage, loans, credit cards rather than increasing taxes on ordinary people to pay for the money lost by the wealthy.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 4.

    The underlying problem is that commercial banks create new money in the form of debt. approx 97% of £'s in circulation is money created in this way. If we (Gov/ Companies/ individuals) reduce our debt burden, the money supply shrinks (Deflation). The only way to get out of debt and back to productive growth is to extend the Bank Charter Act 1844 to cover electronically created money.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 5.

    The bankers are loading the losses for the period they crammed all that gold into their own pockets onto the owners - us.

    When they're ready to flog the shares they'l shovel more old bad debt and obligations onto the owners - us again - to make the offering more appealing.

    If the banks just go bust altogether because the assets are worthless the owners will take the hit - us. Trebles all round!

 

Comments 5 of 317

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

  • A painting of the White House on fire by Tom FreemanFinders keepers

    The odd objects looted by the British from Washington in 1814


  • Chris and Regina Catrambone with their daughter Maria LuisaSOS

    The millionaires who rescue people at sea


  • Plane7 days quiz

    What unusual offence got a Frenchman thrown off a plane?


  • Children testing a bridge at a model-making summer school in Crawley, West SussexSeeding science Watch

    The retired professor who turned village children into engineers


  • Krouwa Erick, the doctor in Sipilou town at the border of Ivory Coast and Guinea - 27 August 2014Bad trip

    The Ebola journey no-one in Ivory Coast wants to take


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.