Directors' pay rose 50% in past year, says IDS report


David Cameron: "There are three important principles here, transparency, accountability, responsibility"

Related Stories

Pay for the directors of the UK's top businesses rose 50% over the past year, a pay research company has said.

Incomes Data Services (IDS) said this took the average pay for a director of a FTSE 100 company to just short of £2.7m.

The rise, covering salary, benefits and bonuses, was higher than that recorded for the main person running the company, the chief executive.

Their pay rose by 43% over the year, according to the study.

Prime Minister David Cameron, speaking in Australia, said the report was "concerning" and called for big companies to be more transparent when they decide executive pay.

Labour leader Ed Miliband said the pay increases were part of a "something for nothing" culture, since the stock market had not risen to match them.

A statement from IDS said that that figure suggested that "executive largesse is evenly spread across the board".

Base salaries rose by just 3.2%, although that was above the median rise recorded by IDS this week for average pay settlements of 2.6% for private sector workers.

The latest consumer price inflation figures showed inflation at 5.2%.

Directors' bonus payments, on average, rose by 23% from £737,000 in 2010 to £906,000 this year.

Around two-thirds of FTSE 100 companies are global operations, for whom the UK is a small part of their operation, including mining giant Rio Tinto.

The Unite union has called executive pay "obscene" and has called for shareholders to be given more power to hold directors accountable.

The union's general secretary, Len McCluskey said: "The Government should strongly consider giving shareholders greater legal powers to question and curb these excessive remuneration packages.

"Institutional shareholders need to exercise much greater scrutiny and control of directors' pay and bonuses.

"It's obscene and it shows that the City has learnt nothing during the financial troubles of the last four years."

Highest paid chief executives 2010/11

Name Company Total earnings/£ Share price change Profit growth

Source: IDS Executive Compensation Review

Mick Davis

Mick Davis





Calendar year

Bart Becht

Bart Becht

Reckitt Benckiser




Michael Spencer (Photo: ICAP)

Michael Spencer





Sir Terry Leahy

Sir Terry Leahy





Year to 26 February

Tom Albanese

Tom Albanese

Rio Tinto




Calendar year

'Complex' packages

"I think it is very hard to justify these sorts of pay increases," Deborah Hargreaves, chair of the High Pay Commission, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

"When you think the average pay is going up 1% or 2%, it's not even meeting price rises. These pay packages have become so complex that executives don't even understand it themselves.

"We have got a closed shop here and someone needs to break it open."

Brendan Barber, the TUC's general secretary, said: "Top directors have used tough business conditions to impose real wage cuts, which have hit people's living standards and the wider economy, but have shown no such restraint with their own pay.

"Reform should start with employee representation on remuneration committees, which would give directors a much-needed sense of reality."

Steve Tatton, who edited the IDS report, said: "Britain's economy may be struggling to return to pre-recession levels of output, but the same cannot be said of FTSE 100 directors' remuneration."

Mr Tatton said that while closer scrutiny of pay awards was expected in future, "remuneration committees will have to make sure that they are able to provide full and thorough justifications for the bonuses awarded."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 906.

    Hold on guys, these are private companies, not publicly owned, so whatever they decide to pay their directors is entirely their decision. If their directors are doing such a good job that they are increasing the company's profit by X amount, then from the company's POV, they deserve their pay packet. We dictate how much these guys get paid by how much we are spending on the company's products.

  • rate this

    Comment number 850.

    If we start limiting what the people who build businesses earn, who's going to take the risks and build them in the first place?

    I built my business from scratch, risking my house and living on nothing for many years.

    Who has a right to tell me what I can now take as a salary from my business?

  • rate this

    Comment number 351.

    Directors argue that they justify their remuneration because of the risks they take. But they aren't taking any risks. If their company does well, they want all the credit; when it does badly they blame the climate and, in worst case, look for bailouts. For them, it's all upside and no downside. Even if sacked, having to cope with payouts of several million is clearly tragic for them.

  • rate this

    Comment number 112.

    Are those 'at the top' aware of the bad feeling towards them? Do they have any clue about the sheer power the 99% would wield if pushed into action? It is almost as if it is a challenge - "we're untouchable". I'm sorry to tell you this guys, but you're not. Tell you what, give the money back now and we'll say no more about it. What do you say?

  • rate this

    Comment number 110.

    Directors are rewarded when things are tough because of the extra burden and then again in good times because the business is 'successful'. Meanwhile the general workforce is hit by low pay increases and threats of losing their jobs when things are tough (and often recently when things are good in pursuit of more profit an efficiency).


Comments 5 of 12


More Business stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.