Steve Jobs: The man who let us feel the future

 

I only met Steve Jobs once, and it was not exactly a meeting. I'd been sent to cover the launch of iTunes Europe and, getting slightly nauseous at the scale of fawning over the guy and his 99p per track music, I decided to take a quite critical line.

My rationale was that in an age where P2P file sharing was taking down the walled garden of intellectual property rights, only a bunch of oldsters would go on paying for their music.

As luck would have it a rival music service was launching that day - emusic.com, based on subscription and DRM-free - and I reported the story as a tale of two business models.

Jobs, of course, was not giving interviews. So I lurched towards him with a microphone as he glad-handed out of the auditorium at the old Billingsgate Market and asked the question one or two tech analysts were also asking: what do you do if it doesn't work? The iMac at the time was looking a sorry machine and some were wondering if the whole PC space would become low-value and commoditised.

"He's not answering that question," said the bodyguard who politely deflected me with some kind of hippy qi-gong force field. To which I added, in the track of the report: "but the markets will".

Well they did.

Apple, on some days, is now the most valuable company on the planet. When I went on holiday this year I took an iPad (for reading books on my Kindle App); my iPhone (for recording an impromptu story for Broadcasting House and getting my e-mail on); and my MacBook Pro, which has all the work I have done since the day Lehman Brothers fell stored on it. Ah yes, and a 160gb iPod.

Jobs, who died last night, was probably the greatest innovator of the age we have lived through: inventing and commercialising the first "cool" personal computer, launching Pixar, the pioneer of digital animation, then coming back to turn Apple into a zeitgeist-owning monster personal electronics company.

Today, as the obits are written, there will rightly be a lot of focus on the revolutionary new things Jobs helped create. They will focus, rightly also, on his mistakes, not least of which was dismissing 12 suicides by production line workers at the Foxconn iPad plant as troubling but "well below the China average".

But the story of iTunes itself is, while prosaic, instructive of what Jobs excelled in.

iTunes stepped into a gap created by the slow, collapsing hubristic record companies and the kids with Napster accounts and no moral commitment to paying for music. Its business model was simply to steal the revenue of the flesh-world retailers, which was dying (how wistfully do you remember your first flick through the vinyl LPs at your local record shop, just wishing that you could find that record you'd heard about from your friends?)

iTunes creamed off 35p of every 99p, with the rest going to the music company and the credit card company, the artist eventually getting about 11p.

It worked for three reasons: a) it massively expanded choice and availability b) it worked seamlessly across all Apple devices and above all with the iPod, which although just a dumb MP3 player, was seamless to use, making the act of listening "unconscious" and untroubled by loads of clicking and finding; and c) because of the "fat tail" of content that could then be brought back to market.

Because Jobs created a very holistically satisfying user experience, human consciousness did the rest. The user's deep emotional attachment to their music collection rubbed off onto the little device itself, not to mention the cool white ear buds, or their various DIY headphone replacements, which instantly denoted your personal style.

This understanding of the emotional bond between man and machine has been the unspoken thing at the heart of nearly all great innovation cycles. The men who tinkered around to invent the Spinning Jenny and the Steam Engine were obsessive garden shed amateurs; ditto the men and women who invented the mouse, the pointer, the pixel.

In 1984, in Leicester, I used to pass the Macintosh shop on London Road in a state of awe. There, blinking at me, was this object of desire. A Macintosh 512. I could not afford one so bought a Spectrum ZX, graduating to an Atari and then an Amstrad before finally saving enough money (this on the salary of a teacher and university lecturer) to buy a SECOND HAND Macintosh SE around about 1988. (I still have the next model in the series, a Macintosh SE30 and I may go into my loft and fire it up today in Steve's honour).

What these machines opened up was the world of glissando-smooth computing: the mouse and pointer world that was still so clunky on a Microsoft PC. And graphic design. Page design, vector drawings and word processing were a joy on an early Mac, in a way that future generations will find impossible to understand unless they are made to sit in front of an Atari or an Amstrad and type long postmodernist articles to the sound of Whitney Houston's I Will Always Love You playing out of an analogue, yes analogue, Walkman tape deck.

When I was a sub-editor in the magazine business we jealously defended our Macs against the constant attempt by management to replace them with PCs, which were clunky and broke down. And then it all went wrong: the Macs kept breaking down, they were expensive, PCs got better and along came games.

I have to confess my 10 year divorce from Apple Inc started when I discovered TacOps, got really serious because of Operation Flashpoint and only really finished because I got so sick of my Asus laptop crashing during Medieval Total War II that I decided to give up games altogether. Luckily this was five days before Lehman Brothers went bust and I had bought a MacBook at Heathrow Airport, frantically sawing the box open in Garfunkel's with a plastic knife to get started there and then.

Jobs did not just create cool technologies: he defined them throughout his whole life. He was part of that generation that understood, intuitively, what Stuart Brand put into words: "information wants to be free." But he also understood we were in a period of transition: between information monopolies and information freedom. He made his and Apple's fortune by inserting himself into the gap between aspiration and reality.

Jobs' products let us experience what it will be like when information really is free; when man and machine inter-operate, when human consciousness can combine across seamless networks, creating what science writer Margaret Wertheim has called "the leaky self".

When I saw that first Mac in the shop window I grasped, intuitively, the stunning thought: that is the future. What genius it must have taken to imagine it from scratch.

** Standard disclaimer: other products are available!

 
Paul Mason Article written by Paul Mason Paul Mason Former economics editor, Newsnight

End of an era

After 12 years on Newsnight, Economics editor Paul Mason has moved on to pastures new and this blog is now closed.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 17.

    A little surprising to see so flattering a commentary here. Part of the future Jobs brought us was the past, all over again, at Foxconn and elsewhere.

    See Mike Daisey's NYT Op-Ed:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/06/opinion/jobs-looked-to-the-future.html?_r=1

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 16.

    Abdulfattah Jandali was born to a large landowning family in Homs in 1931. He moved to US to complete higher education. Syria’s pre-Baath president was Nazem al-Qudsi. Abdulfattah had his first child, born out of wedlock, in 1955. This baby boy would become a legend of the 20th & 21st centuries combined. His name was Steve Jobs – or as many Syrians would love to call him, Steve Jandali.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 15.

    “I wanted my kids to know me.” (Jobs quoted by Pulitzer Prize nominee Walter Isaacson, when asked why he authorized tell-all biography.) “I wasn't always there for them; I wanted them to know why & understand what I did.” (Jobs was adopted soon after birth in San Francisco - American mother, Joanne Carole Schieble, & Syrian-born father, Abdulfattah “John” Jandali.)

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 14.

    In 1986, Jobs closed his charitable foundation after only 15 months. He took flak. Jobs said not a word on behalf of important social issues, reserving his talents for selling Apple products. One of Jobs’s friends was quoted as saying that company & family were his legacies.
    $8 billion estate - most of it in Disney & Apple shares.
    Difficult to understand when there is so much world suffering.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 13.

    Jobs died from pancreatic cancer: not a nice condition to suffer from. He spent his entire working life in electronics as did a close relative who is recovering from his umpteenth bout of some other nasty cancer.

    Might there be a correlation? This is just a thought.....

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 12.

    'I decided to take a quite critical line.'

    As a Mac user with few i's beyond my Mini, I can only envy those who have the full, and latest family gathering..

    Especially those using them to observe, pen and share away whilst grouped decrying billionaire capitalists and their nice, but not perhaps always necessary product ranges feeding Chinese smokestacks.

    Critical lines can be qute selective.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 11.

    Paul, now that QE2 has been unleashed, has anything changed since Nov 2010 when you posted The 'Wall Of Money': A guide to QE2

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/paulmason/2010/11/the_wall_of_money_a_guide_to_q.html

    (is it a case of 'This time is different' ?)

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 10.

    @Gerschenkron
    I had to laugh when Jobs' launched the latest mac mouse - one with no buttons at all!

    I felt he saw that as a minor triumph: Firstly that it was design reduced to its simplest essence and secondly that it put two fingers up to the 'two buttons' evangelists!

    Also, Mac laptops have supported two-finger tapping to 'Right-click' for over 5 years, yet many users seem unaware of that.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    Nice article, Paul, and being a longtime Mac user, respect to Jobs... but I'm not sure an 'information wants to be free' world is necessarily always a good one, for everyone. The BBC may pay you (if not for this article) - but these days, as a musician, not that many people pay me. They sure as hell enjoy a lot of my music, though. For nothing. Fairly soon I'll have to chuck it in....

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    Wow, Merv just launched QE2

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15196078

    Oil has fallen from ~115 to ~102 and so they can inflate the money supply but keep the pump price stable. (ie. pocket the difference)

    Is 75bn going to be enough this time ?
    (and what happened to the 50bn from QE1 that was earmarked for corporate bonds ?)

    Inflation, they can't get enough of it.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 7.

    Really nicely written article Paul, cheers.

    Jobs was more design guru than engineer, his brilliance was taking a human/machine interface and making it work properly and more easily in the interests of the user.
    (PCs forced the user to become more machine-like)

    How he took Sony's Walkman business is a mystery to me though.

    He will be missed.

    **I have never owned any Apple devices.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    It's good that you point out Apple's life before its recent success. I used Apple IIs and then finally had enough money to buy my first computer a Quadra 700. It was astonishing to a non-computer literate, as myself, that I could use it without needing to be a geek (no offence , some of my best friends are geeks).
    Apple -at times infuriating, but thank goodness for Jobs way of doing things. RIP.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    Gerschenkron - you sound like a fool. My iMac has two mouse buttons. You just can't see them. I can right click and left click, without the nasty form that a PC mouse has.
    Everyone does things wrong, but it's undeniable that Jobs was a multi-faceted genius. His level of insight was almost at a point of foresight. It's understandable that people choose to remember him fondly at this time.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    Looking beyond a tendency to technological fetishism I wonder if your MacBook Pro contains any interesting material not yet in the public domain. If yes 1) please publish; if not 2) please ensure it is fully backed up and securely stored.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    Nice post, though not enough on the sult that has become of Apple products and the personality cult surrounding the man himself. Jack Schofield's perfectly reasonably obituary has generated some negative feedback simply because it doesn't start from the assumption that Jobs was a genius who never did anything wrong. Oh - and PCs ARE better than Macs - two mouse buttons.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 2.

    Thank you for writing this & the candour. The key achievement that made the difference, that Steve personally brought, was Beauty. He made elegance important again, even in engineering. The geniuses of any discipline know Beauty is always present in the highest performance strata. Once you have some answers lined up, suddenly everything Simply Fits, in a lovely, effortless, satisfying way.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 1.

    V jealous you've still got your SE30, Paul. I remember producing A3 newspapers on a MacPlus with 2 MB of RAM and Pagemaker 2.0...

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.