Why the world envies Mr Osborne

George Osborne Mr Osborne's freedom to make economic decisions should give him much to smile about

You might have missed it: there's been a lot going on lately. But the UK is back on top.

The government's economic policies over the past year have made it the envy of the free world.

No, I'm not paraphrasing Mr Osborne's speech at the Conservative Party conference.

In fact, party conferences are not a great demonstration of my point. But you have to admit, the more you look at the way the US and the eurozone have confronted their economic problems lately, the better the UK looks.

It's not the content of the government's policies that has set the UK apart; it is the power of Britain's executive branch, and the fact that the government and its central bank have a transparent, fully accountable relationship with one another.

Neither the US nor the eurozone can say the same. If they could, investors would now be a lot less worried about where their economies are going.

Think about it. If Mr Osborne decides to freeze council tax for another year, he can just announce it. When he wanted to raise VAT - he could do that too.

Start Quote

It's no surprise, then, that Chinese officials considering what a Chinese democracy might ultimately look like are said to be increasingly enthralled by the UK model”

End Quote

The chancellor may not see it that way. He probably feels he has a big fight on his hands when he decides to do anything. But those are internal disputes.

He doesn't have to beg Parliament to implement even a fraction of his Budget proposals - as President Obama does. Nor does he have to get 16 other countries to agree with him, as his European colleagues do.

Central banks

Just as important, though Mr Osborne might not always get an easy ride with Mervyn King, at least both sides know where they stand, and everyone has a fair idea where the Bank of England's responsibilities start and end.

As we know, the relationship between the eurozone governments and the European Central Bank is much more fraught, with disastrous consequences for the management of the crisis.

True the US central bank, the Federal Reserve, is in a much stronger position. But even the Fed has found the going more difficult, since its extraordinary interventions to support the banking system and the economy from 2008 onwards.

Senior figures in Congress have been questioning its every move and threatening to take more formal legislative control over its actions. Arguably, that is because the Fed is perceived to be doing the Treasury's bidding, and there is little in the statute books to suggest otherwise.

In the next few months, the UK may have to revisit the relationship between monetary and fiscal policy. The "outside of the box" proposals to support lending and investment that the likes of Adam Posen have discussed would inevitably muddy the dividing line between government and central bank.

But, as with quantitative easing itself, the authorities would at least be innovating from a position of strength; the institutional arrangements underpinning their relationship are strong and fairly uncontroversial.

Ed Balls would say that Mr Osborne is throwing away these advantages, by pursuing the wrong policies. That's for you to decide.

But when ratings agencies look at the UK they don't only see the current set of economic policies, they also see that the chancellor could easily reverse them - if necessary, in a matter of days.

If the chancellor opted for the celebrated Plan B, it could be up and running next week, with barely a parliamentary vote. That sets him apart from many of his international colleagues.

Chinese interest

It's no surprise, then, that Chinese officials considering what a Chinese democracy might ultimately look like are said to be increasingly enthralled by the UK approach. I'm told that the Foreign Office regularly receives requests and visits from the Chinese, wanting to hear more about the "Westminster model".

They see President Obama's Budget announced "dead on arrival" in Congress, and they see our chancellor deliver his Budget to a rapt Parliament, and they know which model would suit them better.

Naturally, such a mighty executive is not to everyone's taste. There's a reason why the Founding Fathers in America wanted all those checks and balances on executive power. But at times of crisis, it sure comes in handy.

David Cameron and George Osborne take their seats at international summits these days, you can bet that most of the other men and women around the table wish they were more like the UK.

Stephanie Flanders Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article

More on This Story

Global Economy


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • Comment number 171.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 170.

    Breaking news : "Italy's credit rating slashed"

    Italy - the nation, no longer "rated" by Moody's.

    Better dance to their tune.

  • rate this

    Comment number 169.

    How Ironic Stephanie

    Osborne is the envy of the world because he's the apple of the credit ratings agencies eye!

    Who really has the power? Does the future of the economy rest on the judgement of George Osborne or Moody's?

    They say jump and we jump.

    Or does deferring to their judgement just provide a convenient excuse?

    "Its not MY fault, they made me do it"

  • rate this

    Comment number 168.

    163.Richard Wise
    answer to both deficit & unemployment is state spending on green infrastructure

    Yes - AND we can also have austerity with state spending on green infrastructure + a fat tax + restructure of UK supermarkets to buy local & British + state spending on green infrastructure + Caroline Lucas & her 1 million green UK jobs + selective VAT rate management


  • rate this

    Comment number 167.

    people are misinterpreting what Stephanie is writing. The blog is not about wether the fiscal/financial position is enviable, but whether the constitutional position is which is undeniably true.

    Yes - well said.

    Being able to exceed their democratic mandate makes UK PM the envy of the world as the ultimate in megla-mania hence £1.2 Trillion UK debt & rising


Comments 5 of 171



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.