The global economy and the Hollow Men


If policy makers wanted to sound the alarm this week about the risks facing the global economy they've succeeded. Investors are alarmed.

The markets want politicians to do more to help solve the debt crisis in the eurozone - but do they know how to fix it?

Markets have been tumbling around the world, in reaction to a darkening global economic landscape - and some equally dark language that politicians have been using to describe it.

No wonder that Christine Lagarde was trying to introduce some light, to go with the gloom, in her remarks at the BBC World Debate, in the main atrium of the International Monetary Fund on Thursday.

Again and again, she said it was important to focus on the bright side: the parts of the world that were growing, and the steps that European politicians, for example, have already taken to get the crisis under control.

There is a path out of this which politicians can take, she said, it's just narrower, and steeper than it was three years ago.

The US Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, struck a similar tone, in a televised interview for a US political magazine on Thursday morning.

He rejected the idea that America was facing a lost decade.

And when asked whether Greece would default, he insisted that European leaders would not let Greece be a "Lehmans-style event" for the global economy.

But of course, you can read that two ways.

You can read it as saying that Greece will not be allowed to default. Or, you can read it as saying that Greece will not - must not - be allowed to default in an uncontrolled way, that brings down banks and infects the broader European economy.

No-one's saying never, these days, when it comes to a Greek default.

Geithner's message

Mr Geithner did say that he was confident that the Europeans would be beefing up their emergency bailout facility, the European Financial Stability Facility, to give it more firepower to respond to crises and, for example, provide additional capital to banks.

That is something that the French and German leaders explicitly said they would not do, only a few weeks ago.

So, at the BBC World debate, I asked the European Commissioner, Olli Rehn, whether that was on the cards - and if so when it would happen.

He said it was a good idea in principle but - surprise, surprise - governments needed to take it one step at a time.

I'm guessing no-one should hold their breathe.

In their letter to President Sarkozy, laying down the priorities for the Cannes G20 Summit, David Cameron and five other heads of state put their finger on the problem: they said that confidence of citizens, businesses and markets had been damaged by a "lack of visible political will".

But it's not only a question of will.

Impossible action?

What makes some here really gloomy is not just that politicians seem to lack political will - or a good understanding of the scale of the problem. Many of them have that already.

The real worry is that even when politicians in Europe and America decide they will take the difficult steps that the IMF and the markets are asking them to take, the current state of their political institutions simply won't make it possible for them to do it.

For all the consciousness-raising of the past few days, there still seems to be a large gap between what economists and markets say is needed - and politicians are able to provide.

There's a phrase from T S Eliot's "The Hollow Men" that keeps going through my head:

"Between the idea and the reality

Between the motion and the act

Falls the shadow."

Perhaps the G20 ministers meeting here in Washington will manage to lift it, but right now investors are seeing mainly shadow.

Stephanie Flanders, Economics editor Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article


Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    Eurozone ministers are mostly talking, but as Douglas Adams (Hitch-hikers Guide to the Galaxy) might say, they have to keep their mouths moving, otherwise their brains start to work.

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    Perhaps the politicians realise the futility of keeping proping up this ponzi scheme. Let the house collapse and we can build on whatever solid foundations are left.

    Stand back.

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    The market deals with numbers, politicians deal with people. The people don't want austerity for themselves, only "them" "others". Politicians need to decide between the markets and the people.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    Nothing will change until the fractional reserve banking fraud is made universally illegal. You cannot solve monetary problems with funny money. You solve monetary problems with real assets & real wealth. I can't see a return to the gold standard, but I can see a total financial collapse if the banks are not given their marching orders. No state bank should be privately owned. No more ponzi money

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    I saw Danny Blancheflower today explaining how monetary policy, specifically QE, was probably working, but central banks did not understand the "transmission mechanism". The transmission mechanism of fiscal policy is well understood, why don't governments use that.

    Oh, I forgot, they have already sold the public on the lie that interest rates will rise!


Comments 5 of 177


This entry is now closed for comments


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.