Can a ban on speculation strengthen Europe's banks?

 
Societe Generale Shares in bank Societe Generale saw sharp falls

There is a risk that the temporary ban on the short-selling of shares in banks by regulators in France, Italy, Spain and Belgium will achieve the opposite of what is intended.

Short-selling is when an investor sells shares in a company they don't actually own, in the hope that the share price will fall and the shares can be bought back cheaper, to yield a profit.

It's an aggressive bet that shares are falling.

The temporary European ban, announced last night, comes in the wake of dramatic falls in the share prices of European banks, especially those of Italy and France - where on Wednesday the shares in one giant bank, Societe Generale, were more than a fifth lower at one stage.

Now because falls in share prices of that magnitude can bash the confidence of those who lend to banks, they threaten the viability of those banks - so a temporary ban can be seen as a sensible calming measure, if it reduces the volatility of bank share prices.

But if the ban is viewed as a panicky measure by eurozone authorities to provide temporary respite to financial institutions that are not as strong as they might be, then conventional investors in banks - and their creditors - would feel under greater pressure to remove their financial support from those banks.

Here are three other reasons why the ban may not work.

1) It is not clear that the recent falls in the prices of Unicredit of Italy, Soc Gen of France and so on were the consequence of short-selling by speculators rather than by conventional investors.

2) When short-selling has been temporarily banned in other jurisdictions, it has led to increased volatility in share prices (the reverse of what was wanted), because it has tended to deter certain kinds of institutions, such as hedge funds, from participating in the relevant markets. In other words, liquidity in those markets, the availability of cash for purchases and sales, has been reduced.

3) The ban relates only to short-selling in France, Italy, Spain and Belgium. But the relevant banks' shares are also traded in big international markets, such as the UK and Wall Street, where short-selling is still allowed. So the prohibition won't in theory prevent hedge funds and other investors short-selling French and Italian banks, for example, through offshore exchanges.

Here's a bit of history that isn't encouraging.

On 18 September 2008, the UK regulator, the Financial Services Authority, introduced a temporary ban on the short-selling of bank and financial shares. Within days, Bradford & Bingley collapsed and was nationalised, and that was followed in mid-October by the taxpayer rescues of Royal Bank of Scotland and HBOS/Lloyds.

Few would argue that the eurozone's banks are as weak as many international banks were in 2007-8. But precedent suggests a short-selling ban does not change the fundamentals.

 
Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Britain's soggy future?

The Bank of England's chief economist, Andy Haldane, tells the BBC that there's a risk that long term growth in the UK, and other developed economies, will be "soggier than it has been in the past"

Read full article

More on This Story

Global Economy

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 265.

    #249 you might "know" that 95% of derivative trading is speculation. Sadly I can find no evidence or academic research to back such a statement up.

    Stick to facts not irrational argument

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 264.

    the market is very poor and so is industry, like sharks must keep moving, money used to grease businesses and kept the wheels of industry turning dried up and everything ceased moving. there's a derivatives bubble ballooned to US$1 Quadrillion ready to burst.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 263.

    I'm a hedge fund. borrow money from banks to then place bets on the value of various commodities, companies and deriviatives. I don't even have to pay for these, take delivery of them or even fully understand them. I can even depress the value of a company by selling stock in it to a third party, even though I don't own the stock. Who would give you a loan for this business.? Exactly

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 262.

    It can not be right that some-one can sell shares they haven't got. If there are several people doing that the market will be distorted. Then panic can set in, perhaps with the help of a bit of rumour starting, like suggesting the French banks are in danger. Short selling should be banned.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 261.

    Short selling can drive down or decimate company valuations and expose them to hostile takeovers.

    Q's
    are Stock Lenders lending out their own stock or underlying clients stock?
    i.e. are custodians double dealing stock held in safekeeping accounts?

 

Comments 5 of 265

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.