Greece crisis: Not Europe's Lehman (it could be worse)

 
Greek national flag waves behind rails above the parliament in Athens

Eurozone finance ministers' overnight decision to withhold payment of 12bn euros (£10bn) of emergency loans to Greece, pending agreement by the Greek parliament on austerity measures and privatisations, would be rational and credible on the basis that Greece has more to lose from a disorderly Greek default than the eurozone itself.

Or to put it another way, threats are only worth making if those making the threats could actually carry them out.

But if, as is not impossible, the Greek prime minister George Papandreou - under extreme pressure from popular and parliamentary opposition - were unable in the coming few days to win backing for his reshaped cabinet and the deficit reduction programme demanded by Germany, France and the rest, would other eurozone governments sit idly by as Greece told its creditors they couldn't have their money back?

The point is that such an event would have potentially catastrophic consequences for holders not only of 340bn euros (£300bn) of Greek sovereign debt, but also for holders of hundreds of billions of euros of Greek commercial debt and tens of billions of euros of derivative contracts linked to Greek debts.

At a stroke, such a default would also increase the perceived risk of lending to Ireland and Portugal, triggering vast additional losses on hundreds of billions of euros of loans to those states and their respective banks.

And with the jury out about the long term sustainability of Spanish and Italian debts, the governments of those countries would find themselves having to pay a painful bigger premium over what Germany pays to borrow.

In itself, such an event of default would blow up the balance sheets of banks all over Europe: the banks in Greece, Portugal and Ireland itself could survive (probably) only as nationalised entities; and some banks in France, Germany and even the US would suffer losses that would take their capital resources to dangerously low levels.

As for the European Central Bank, as the holder of more Greek, Portuguese and Irish sovereign debt than any other institution on the planet, it too would be bust, requiring a massive injection of financial support from eurozone countries - which would be the kind of public humiliation from which the ECB would take years, in a reputational sense, to recover.

Do the finance ministers of Germany, France, the Netherlands et al really want that?

What is a Lehman moment?

In September 2008, the US government allowed Lehman Bros, America's fourth largest investment bank, to collapse. The consequences were huge losses for creditors and - perhaps more importantly - panic in markets, as banks and financial institutions withdrew credit from any substantial borrower perceived to be weak. This evaporation of lending triggered the worst global recession since the 1930s.

Nor, of course, would that be the end of the potential catastrophe. As my colleague Chris Morris has been pointing out in compelling and chilling reports from Athens, there is a growing popular movement in Greece for the country to pull out of the euro altogether - with the likes of London's mayor, Boris Johnson, demonstrating in the streets (in a metaphorical sense) with the revolting Greek populace.

Here's the thing. If any eurozone member were to leave the euro, if Greece or anyone else were to adopt its own independent currency, the cost of borrowing for pretty much every other eurozone member - with the exception of Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands - would rise.

The reason is that euro membership would no longer be forever. So anyone lending to Spain, Italy or even France would have to be compensated for the risk - however remote - that their euro-denominated debt would one day convert into something tied more directly to the health of their respective economies and the strength of their respective public-sector balance sheets.

In the current fragile state of the eurozone's economic recovery, a rise in borrowing costs for eurozone member states would be profoundly unhelpful.

Oh, and let's not waste time considering the minefield of international litigation that would be created by a unilateral decision by Greece to turn hard euro debts into soft drachma debts - or to dwell on whether the conversion could in practice apply only to government borrowings, or whether it would also extend to government-guaranteed debts or pure commercial debts.

So, putting all this together leads to two inescapable conclusions.

First, that when people talk about Greece as Europe's Lehman moment, they are wrong. Letting Greece default in a disorderly, uncontrolled way would probably be a good deal worse for the global economy than Lehman's collapse - for all that banks in general have more capital to absorb losses than was the case in the autumn of 2008, and are less dangerously inter-connected with each other.

Second, the eurozone ministers' decision to postpone the definitive decision on a further 12bn euros of bridging loans for Greece is not likely to scare Greece's austerity objectors into submission.

It could well persuade the Greek opponents of fiscal retrenchment that eurozone ministers are all talk and no trousers, that they are so disunited on how to fashion a fundamental solution to Greece's excessive debts that Greece is better off taking direct control of its own economic destiny.

However, if this eurozone brinkmanship nudges the Greek parliament to reject the further budget squeeze, we'll be closer than is remotely prudent or sensible to a 1930s-style financial and economic disaster.

 
Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Farewell to the mother of all depressions

What kind of economic recovery has the UK been enjoying, and can it last?

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 379.

    The sad truth arising from the smouldering flames of the Greek phoenix is that Greece was dragged kicking and screaming into the economic system of the EU. A country which in many respects is Third World should never have adopted the euro in the first place. German and French bankers should have known better!! I foresee Germany readopting the mark faster than the Greeks exhuming the drachma.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 378.

    I am just back from Greece and know it well. They are all very angry with their government but the problem is partly their own fault. They still think paying tax is financing a Turkish army of occupation. That is why every self respecting Greek has several thousand Euros in their back pocket and always asks for cash. Greece alsorecieves huge EU subsidies for goats etc that are now hard to find

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 377.

    The stronger Eurozone countries need to prepare now for bailing out their banks in return for equity stakes following Greek default. I have little doubt that they are doing this. The question of whether Greece retains the Euro is insignificant for anyone but the Greeks.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 376.

    So the Greeks cannot pay, EU politicians act tough but their citizens are fed up. Meanwhile UK and US print money to prop up their systems, so it will dawn on the Greeks to do the same - exit Euro - hyperinflation has benefits as well - Ignorant plebs like me think the bankers deserve their losses forgetting that they will have swapped the debt and we all fall in the pond - a real Lehman moment?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 375.

    69. richard bunning
    "Greece reveals.. that the entire population of a country can be held to account for the actions of its banks and politicians. "

    Oh, please. It's common knowledge that tax corruption in Greece is commonplace, and not just amongst the 'banks and politicians'. Some of the population of Greece are acting like spoiled children, but they are as much to blame as anyone else.

 

Comments 5 of 379

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.