Poorest pensioners face 'heat or eat' concern


The country's poorest pensioners are having to cut back on food in order to pay for heating

The poorest pensioner households cut their food spending during very cold spells of weather to cover the cost of heating, a report has said.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said that all retired households raised fuel spending by 7% during cold snaps.

The poorest quarter of pensioner households also decreased their food spending by a similar proportion during the same period.

The report comes the day after Scottish Power announced it was to raise prices.

The utility company is to raise the cost of gas by 19% and the cost of electricity by 10% from 1 August, affecting 2.4 million households in the UK.

Naming effect

The IFS, in a separate report published simultaneously, said that older people spent an average of 41% of their winter fuel payment on heating bills.

The institute concluded that describing the benefit as a winter fuel payment encouraged recipients to spend more of the money on heating bills.

If the income of a pensioner household is increased by £100, they will increase their spending on fuel by £3. However, if that increase is labelled as a winter fuel payment then £41 will go on fuel, the report concluded.

Winter fuel payment

  • Payment of between £100 and £300 aimed to help pay energy bills
  • Available this winter for people born on or before 5 January 1951
  • Different to cold weather payment, which is paid to some people on benefits during sustained freezing conditions

The annual winter fuel payment can be between £100 and £300 depending on the recipient's situation. Most people born on or before 5 January 1951 will be entitled to the payment during the forthcoming winter.

It is aimed to help pay the increased heating bills of winter, but recipients are not obliged to spend it in that way.

"The winter fuel payment was introduced to encourage older households to spend more on heating in the winter," said Laura Blow, senior research economist at the IFS.

"Remarkably it appears to have had just that effect. The fact that it is labelled a winter fuel payment appears to mean that much more of it is spent on fuel than would have been the case had no such label been attached.

Wintry weather Several spells of cold weather have hit the UK in recent years

"This suggests that simply calling a benefit by a particular name can have a real effect on how it is spent. The potential implications for government policy are significant."

However, the IFS added that the payment, along with the cold weather payment top-up, did not fully protect all older households from the impact of very cold weather - when temperatures are more than 2C lower than would be expected at that time of year.

A spokeswoman for the Department for Work and Pensions said: "We are committed to doing all we can to ensure that vulnerable older people can keep their homes warm in the winter."

Energy prices

Commentators have warned that energy bills for most households are likely to rise in the coming months.

The other major domestic gas and electricity suppliers are "almost certain" to follow the lead of Scottish Power in increasing prices, according to Joe Malinowski, founder of TheEnergyShop.com.

He told the BBC that wholesale energy prices had risen, but still remained below their historical peak.

He also predicted that some fixed-cost deals were likely to disappear as the price changes occurred.



This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 155.

    I am baffled by this story. My elderly father eats and keeps warm. He manages very well. He lives within his means, doesnt smoke and doesnt drink. He is not a retired banker.

  • rate this

    Comment number 145.

    The allowance would be better spent if targeted at poorer pensioners to pay for energy-efficency measures: people need warm homes, not an ongoing subsidy to live in cold ones!
    The allowance is too small to cover the heating bills of the poorest pensioners living in cold houses, yet £millions are wasted supporting well-off pensioners in comfortable homes - and even in residential care homes!

  • rate this

    Comment number 140.

    The energy increases are due to less supply and more demand plus paying for (subsidise) 'green' energy (eg wind farms). We have to decide what we want, cheap (or less expensive) energy or pay for less efficient methods but 'green'. Atomic energy HAS to be considered as it 'ticks' most boxes

  • rate this

    Comment number 124.

    All this talk of means testing heating and other benefits goes back to the pension debate, means testing deters people from saving.

  • rate this

    Comment number 102.

    Another no brainer. Create jobs making solar panels / wind turbines to install into low income homes as the only people who can afford these are the well off. This would help to reduce the long term issue of the counties CO2 emissions, reduce the countries fuel imports.
    Also make free warm clothing etc. Stop throwing cash at them as they probably bank it anyway.


Comments 5 of 9


More Business stories



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.